Mike Leigh’s seventh feature is a sumptuous-looking biopic about Gilbert and Sullivan, the Victorian-era theatrical partnership of the dramatist W.S. Gilbert (Broadbent) and the composer Arthur Sullivan (Corduner, a competent jazz pianist in real life), dramatizing the gestation and birth of their most successful work, the comic opera THE MIKADO, culminating on its opening night, 14th March, 1885.
With a running time edging 160 minutes, TOPSY-TURVY sees Leigh buckle down with exhaustive dedication to the period niceties, the sweeping characterization of a large ensemble and the lengthy preliminary works leading to the opening night, courageously using his troupers’ own singing voice, although it doesn’t always do the magic as he wishes, Leigh and co.’s endeavor deservedly earns two Oscars (costume design and makeup) for their craft, but fails to prosper in its box office revenue.
One major problem of the disconnection with its audience, particularly for those who are not hailed from an Anglo-Saxon background or unequipped with the reflexes of onrushing pride whenever hears the pair’s names being mentioned, is that these two main protagonists are wanting either charisma (in the case of a stuffy Gilbert, a wasted Broadbent, all prim and proper) or characteristic (Sullivan, an afflicted sybarite but the movie has too much reverence, or too little guts to go deep down that decadent path), therefore, their stories barely bite, the initial sticking point of a creative difference wrought by Sullivan’s stuck inspiration and physical exhaustion, which is presented as if he is fed up with the middle-brow librettos, that made his name and fortune, and decides to aim for a higher cause, writing a serious opera, naturally evanesces when Gilbert finally wades out of his comfort zone and mines into an untapped oriental culture. A waft of hypocrisy, yes, but there is no irony to sugar the pill.
The merely interesting note about the two arrives belatedly near the coda, the juxtaposition of Gilbert’s seemingly asexual interest in his wife Lucy (Manville, who is indomitably affecting in her constant frustration about their self-conscious childless plight, and puzzlement of why her husband is so gentlemanlike in her chamber, often leaves her to her beauty sleep on her ownsome) with Sullivan’s profligate proclivity, his mistress Fanny Ronalds (David) is pregnant again, finally sheds certain personal lights on top of their diametrical personalities, which triggers viewers a bigger question, apart from their respective talents, what makes them successful and long-time collaborators? Unfortunately, Leigh’s film has little to offer on that front.
Be that as it may, TOPSY-TURVY gets its mojo back when it tackles the kaleidoscopic aspects of those more approachable thespians, toiling on the stage, haggling for a salary raise, caviling at the costumes, showing solidarity against Gilbert’s willful decision or simply having a whale of time during their simulation process of a disparate culture. Among them, Timothy Spall is such a gas as the mainstay of the Savoy Theater in spite of his slightly hoarse and amateur vocal facility; a corset-strapped Kevin McKidd knows the trick of deadpan humor; both Dorothy Atkinson and Shirley Henderson are felicitous whether they are in or out of costume, with the latter stealing the show in the end to overpower spectators with her trademark high-pitched, child-like register.
By relating Gilbert’s out-of-the-box inspiration to Leigh, who also, for the first time, detaches himself from contemporary working class stratum, the usual fecund ground of his creations, TOPSY-TURVY shows up a lack of understanding between him and his subjects, and doesn’t live up to Leigh’s high-water mark, however boisterous and lavish the film looks, if its characters don’t click with audience, the rest can do little avail.
referential entries: Leigh’s MR. TURNER (2014, 8.1/10), ANOTHER YEAR (2010, 8.1/10).
從頭到尾局限的取景,鏡頭前的一切仿佛就發(fā)生在一個狹小的舞臺空間
北??催^。這一片的文本并不是特別麥克李,開宗明義的一出歷史風俗劇,倒是有點像法國中尉的女人(小說)里的福爾斯。老于認出了羅馬里那個百夫長啊。
2012-146.幾乎都是室內場景,道具、服裝、化妝皆十分精美!另外上下可顛倒的海報相當牛啊…
有點過分長了,尤其是對于“創(chuàng)作過程”的展示,邁克李老師也有過困惑期。
2019119 二星還行
我就說跟古典沾邊的東西我不能碰……在我看來,這么華麗的投資太浪費了……
勘稱完美的一部作品,可以進入我最喜愛的電影中,尤其是結尾,收的太完美了。影片深刻細致地勾勒出藝術創(chuàng)作理想與現(xiàn)實的矛盾又統(tǒng)一的關系,揭示了一部真正完美的作品最需要的是“見情”。
布景和歌舞一流。寫戲賣戲三位和演戲的若干位,除了他們的職業(yè)生活,感情生活也刻畫得入木三分。1885年英國藝術界的女人們,已經(jīng)獨立起來了。
8.5/10。19世紀末:一對歌劇創(chuàng)作搭檔(兩男)因做不出好作品而各種關系僵化瀕臨鬧掰,以及他們后來決定一起盡心創(chuàng)作一部歌劇作品《日本天皇》并最終大獲成功。影片可視為一部歌舞片(只不過歌舞不是好萊塢或寶萊塢那類),有著精美的高水平攝影美術,各種歌劇段落也處理(調度剪輯編排等)地好,但作為傳統(tǒng)故事片本片敘事較散較拖,扣1分。
對于我這種一個半小時才開始入戲的惡俗觀眾來說,這就是一場視覺和聽覺的盛宴
The more I see of men, the more I admire dogs.
本片采用長時間全景式的拍攝方式,在傳記片的書寫方式上,用類似于白描流水賬的方式記錄這次舞臺從最開始到上演的全過程,并展示參演人員的各種狀況,這種方式和91年的《梵高》相同,閃光之處就在于可以極為便捷的將所處時代書寫的完美至極,但與之不同的是,本片的視角并非集中,而是分散,而在傳記片中做群像又不現(xiàn)實,這就導致了電影因人物繁雜顯的冗長,而戲中戲的部分也要見仁見智了。另一方面是人物創(chuàng)作困境書寫,此類影片最著名的要屬《八部半》和《爵士春秋》了,前一部借由此來探討個人,后一部用不斷改寫為發(fā)端,在場面上引入歌舞,在本片來看,兩者似乎都有,但都不深入,前一部分,因為一次瀏覽而就解決了,導致不能深究,而后一部分又因為歌劇沒有歌舞觀賞性高和調度單一,導致乏味,最終令創(chuàng)作問題只成了串聯(lián)電影發(fā)展的脈絡,缺乏討論。
temple的自語:laughter,tears,curtain.(笑聲,眼淚,幕布。)
Gilbert and Sullivan refers to the Victorian-era theatrical partnership of the dramatist W. S. Gilbert (1836–1911) and the composer Arthur Sullivan (1842–1900) and to the works they jointly created. The two men collaborated on fourteen comic operas between 1871 and 1896.
英國導演邁克·李的一部以十九世紀為背景的古裝劇。太長了,而且字幕較差,看了個稀里糊涂。
好的電影,就是讓你看了一大半才發(fā)現(xiàn)是生肉但是仍舊樂在其中
邁克李電影中的臺詞真是非英母語觀眾的噩夢啊……導演寫人物從來不會令人失望,但是電影前半段流水賬,后半段則成了“the making of xxx”式的紀錄片結構,還拍得這么長,實在是很難讓觀眾真正投入其中。邁克李的電影拿正反打和“排排坐”撐全片其實完全可以接受,然而連歌舞場面的調度也這么偷懶就不得不吐槽了,這拍法和舞臺搬演有啥區(qū)別……?
[CHD].Topsy-Turvy.1999.BluRay.1080p.DTS.x264-CHD酣歌暢戲 [被評選為十五年最佳一百五十部電影之一] [CC 帶導評]
邁克·李的作品看過幾部,都頗喜歡,他是能夠從日常生活中尋找戲劇與箴言的導演。但這一部,我實在無感,只能說古裝戲不錯,舞臺戲不錯,至于英式幽默,確實沒有feel到。CC版還出過一部《日本天皇》,是一部歌劇,美國人演日本戲,似乎那戲就是該片中的那部歌劇。
這算不算變相的紀錄片啊。蒂莫西·斯波好可愛。本來想看德克斯特·弗萊徹的,卻沒怎么出場啊。第一次正式看萊絲利·曼維爾的演出,總忍不住遙想當年和Gary~~~