A chipper oldie ravishes its spectator with a gung-ho complexion that is so disarming a benignant viewer might be completely oblivious of its cut-throat capitalistic machination which is attendant with the plot's boom-and-bust vagaries.
Two wildcatters Big John McMasters (Gable) and Square John Sand (Tracy) hit it off quickly (thanks to their mutual instinct of dodging potshots), and bouncily go for it in their oil rigging enterprise, there are hits and misses ongoing, but their archetypal bromance is put into a critical test when they are both besotted with the same dame, Betsy Bartlett (Colbert). The narrative cavalierly pass the buck to Betsy since Big John has no inkling that she is Square John’s gal, but Betsy knows Big John alright, which doesn’t stop her from jilting a more matter-of-fact Square John for the newly ignited coup-de-foudre (and it all happened one night!). Thankfully, the reunited Gable-Colbert pair knows how to play the flirtatious bonhomie right, and a bluff Tracy makes a rather surprising capitulation to the “she is not that into him” situation but is never able to get over her, instead, he becomes the watchdog of their marriage, a resolute assurer that Betsy’s happiness is unadulterated.
Therefore, the years-spanning story extends into a series friend-or-foe games between Big John and Square John, predicated on Betsy’s well-being, hopping from places to places, their fortune alternately ebbs and flows. When at its best, an oil wildfire spectacle is surely awe-inspiring through its matted black-and-white expressionism; yet in its worst, the patchy narrative wears thin quickly when the love triangle equilibrium levels out. So an extrinsic force timely arrives in the form of Hedy Lamarr’s drop-dead gorgeous Karen Vanmeer, Big John's business advisor and a socialite who is adept at eavesdropping, as an interloper, she is not beyond reproach but for once, she is presented more than a vacuous bombshell, in fact she has the wiles to apply her own counter-moves when Square John tries to buy her out. And presciently, Spencer Tracy’s courtroom rhetoric is set ablaze in a transitory but consequential moment.
Slightly tortuous in its story-line, and 77 years have passed, Jack Conway’sBOOM TOWN has sustained to evince a pristine luster in pointing up two of the most peddled attributes of America: the land of opportunity and the propitious everything-will-be-fine motto.
referential point: Frank Capra’s IT HAPPENED ONE NIGHT (1934, 8.1/10)
can't understand why choosing a wild fellow over a nice decent guy?
當年的蓋博真是引領無數(shù)風騷啊
本想當一夜風流的續(xù)集看,前半段搞事業(yè)還不錯,結果后面就成家庭倫理劇了,海蒂拉瑪一個小時后才出場
蓋博和考爾白在一起還是那麼甜蜜,讓人總是回憶起「一夜風流」的時候。海蒂確實美的沉魚落雁,讓那個時代閃閃發(fā)光的女星都黯然失色。蓋博在這部電影裡的演繹恐怕沒有人會不沉迷於這樣憂鬱性感又機智果敢善於逗女孩子的男人。很喜歡看他眼神和嘴角邊的鬍鬚,他定定的望著你笑,那攝人心魂的幅度,勾勒著完整又堅毅的面龐,男人味十足,太帥了??
感謝“甜蜜字幕組”,藍光片源配上優(yōu)質(zhì)中字,真是享受,海蒂美的象天仙
兩個John一個善決策,一個善管理,他們相互扶持又相互角力,兩人的默契是孩童般幼稚的斗氣不服輸,嘴硬打架卻守著唯一的綽號,哪怕是兩男一女的三角關系也從未發(fā)展出爛俗的枝節(jié),Square John用自己的智慧忠誠守護著Big John的家庭事業(yè),相比Gable一貫的魅力,Spencer Tracy沉穩(wěn)可靠的形象更值得銘記。
3.5星,看上去是現(xiàn)實主義題材實則浪漫過頭,類似蓋博扮演的男一號這樣的男人有太多,但是類似屈塞扮演的男二號這樣的男人恐怕是真沒有,這個角色完全是理想化的簡直是“圣人”,要么他就是既愛克勞黛又愛蓋博吧。。。PS拉瑪打醬油的時候演技還不那么拙劣。。。
一夜風流cp再合作,但是這個三角關系過于理想化,反復破產(chǎn)再發(fā)達,鬧著玩兒呢??
我的豆瓣第1000部電影,呼應第一部的一夜風流。Gable還是和Colbert最有CP感誒。感覺像是圓了一夜風流沒拍到的二人婚后生活
可惜啊,半部好片…
劇情發(fā)展快得像在飆車,另外,海蒂拉瑪真的太漂亮了
雖然三個主角演技爆表念法律條文可能我都喜歡聽但是這個片子也實在太模式化太瑣碎了,看得我一直看時間怎么才過了一個小時Hedy怎么還沒出現(xiàn)(她戲份大概和前面歌女差不多)。最主要的是我完全沒法理解克拉克蓋博賴以成名的constantly cheating husband角色到底魅力何在,三四十年代婦女到底在想什么。
總體上不錯,又是克拉克蓋博的作品,反映當年礦井工人的故事,呼吁對于礦井工人的重視以及開采礦井的歷程
幾乎沒有什么HL的戲份
又是一夜風流里的一對兒黃金年代啊米高梅天下。蓋博真是wildcat with brains & hands。屈塞更重情寧可退居二線。CC很夫人相很端正大方。HL更小秘和V確實有點像。簡單的三角戀故事但看的有滋味。
前面還挺好看,三個角色很有意思,越往后元素越多,各種genre反復跳,又太擠太趕了,平均每一刻鐘破產(chǎn)一次再來十分鐘又變成millionaire, 在逗我?
Claudette和Clark再共演注定會很甜!從記者名媛到現(xiàn)在的石油夫婦還是可愛!前半部分都很好很有歷史感,但是從油田著火開始節(jié)奏就一路崩塌到結尾淪為徹底家庭倫理劇。記得很清楚當中一個鏡頭克勞黛在接吻前揉了一把蓋博的頭發(fā),看到的時候差點拍手贊美她滿足了我對這個場景的渴望(不是x
每個女人都會愛上Big John,但每個女人都想嫁給Short John…
片源以及中文字幕已經(jīng)發(fā)布,請上微博,搜‘甜蜜電影字幕組’即有!
差不多的情節(jié)蓋博到底演過多少次?這回比舊金山和曼哈頓都差點。Hedy Lamarr的角色倒是和對她本人的印象有點像……