Other than being a sartorial trendsetter of its namesake Kitty Foyle dress, Sam Wood’s solid screen adaptation of Christopher Morley’s novel, penned by Mr. Trumbo, also confers its star Ginger Rogers a golden opportunity to strut her stuff, not her usual terpsichorean nimbleness, but her acting bent, and its reward is a hard-earned Oscar statuette, pipping strong contenders like Bette Davis in THE LETTER (1940, 8.0/10), Joan Fontaine in REBECCA (1940, 8.3/10) and Katharine Hepburn in THE PHILADELPHIA STORY (1940, 8.1/10).
After a prologue demonstrating the victory of gender equity in the beginning of twentieth century, here comes our heroine Kitty Foyle (Rogers), a New York saleswoman from Philadelphia, facing a difficult choice, there are two suitors awaiting her at midnight, one is doctor Mark Eisen (Craig) who loves her affectionately and another is her sweetheart Wyn Strafford (Morgan), whom she is enamored with, but a married man now who proposes that they can start anew in South America. When dithering about her decision, the film segues through a series of flashbacks (à la PENNY SERENADE 1941)with a snow globe as its mnemonic cue, detailing Kitty’s past entanglement with those two men, especially with Wyn, from their first meeting in Philly, their romance is congenially tainted by their social echelons, Wyn is from a prosperous banker’s family and she is merely his secretary, a rubberneck of the Assembly which Wyn attends annually. Acting in accordance with its woman-empowering tenet, the film vouchsafes Kitty a carte blanche by suggesting that Wyn is too meek and callow to make up his own mind. So Kitty leaves Philly when she knows a wedding proposal is too quixotic at that point, and in NYC, she is courted by Mark, who is the opposite of Wyn’s opulence, with a slightly prosaic air of practicality.
Life’s vagaries again bring Wyn to her, this time with a sincere marriage proposal and lavish pageantry to swoon her, they tie the knot, but reality check creeps in when Kitty has to face Wyn’s family and their unrelieved gentility, once more she braves herself to cut the Gordian knot. There are more hammer blows await her but as a paragon of modern woman with an absolutely righteous mind, Kitty proves herself a real hoop-jumper, and this time, she will make a right choice once and for all.
Ms. Rogers is most sympathetic when she brings forth Kitty's fortitude in the face of adversities, but the story’s emotional potency is detrimentally hampered by the white-washing of the hardship of being an independent woman surviving in a big city by all herself, Kitty is presented with an ineradicable veneer of silver screen allure which inexorablyrenders the tonality a shade condescending and contrived to any audience who chances upon it in the 21st century. Two supporting stars,Dennis Morgan and James Craig both make a great impression as an open-faced, suave gentleman without wiles, what differentiates them is where do they come from, not a bad marriage advice for today’s singletons although the film itself is as workmanlike as it is anodyne, a typical end product of Hollywood in thrall of production code,but not exactly a "natural" history of a woman.
referential points: Sam Wood’s THE DEVIL AND MISS JONES (1941, 7.2/10),George Steven’sPENNY SERENADE (1941, 7.0/10)
對(duì)鏡自語同框剪輯,怎么也轉(zhuǎn)不過去的水晶球。工廠造星年代,29歲的金姐一臉滄桑。
7.6 女權(quán)題材,劇本敘事工整,沒什么高明之處,著重塑造一位令人喜愛的獨(dú)立自強(qiáng)的女性形象,放到如今有點(diǎn)像是那種沖著表演獎(jiǎng)去的影片,好在金吉羅杰斯表演足夠優(yōu)秀,所有這些對(duì)于這種表演挑大梁的影片已經(jīng)最夠好了。
女性的獨(dú)立自主讓她們?cè)趹賽酆突橐龅乃枷胫懈幼杂?,但現(xiàn)實(shí)依然是殘酷的,撥開愛情的煙霧彈才是女主人公最終選擇的路。金格爾的眼睛很美,表演的很細(xì)膩。感謝鯨魚奶奶的辛苦翻譯和可樂大神的辛苦校對(duì)。DL:http://t.cn/8spMLCW or http://t.cn/8spMLCl
不明白為什么女主一次次離開,又一次次等待男主來找。什么毛病啊~~
父親的水晶球,逗趣的女室友,刻字的酒瓶子,敗選的共和黨,古老的費(fèi)城家族,五歲的前夫之子……以及不知道誰說過的老話:一個(gè)人終歸會(huì)選擇去見醫(yī)生。
還不錯(cuò),打破美國夢,試圖用一種女權(quán)的視角去審視愛情,但正如開片展示的那樣對(duì)女權(quán)的理解有些偏頗。人家那時(shí)就在宣揚(yáng)不要拜金,現(xiàn)在咱們卻盡是嫁入豪門就能過上好生活的韓劇節(jié)奏,明顯意識(shí)上就不正確嘛。片子講得有點(diǎn)慢了,但頗具說服力,金吉跟角色很搭。講童話的人很聰明總是不到結(jié)局就把故事結(jié)束了
Dennis Morgan的小嘴歪的真性感。
7.5,有些地方繞有趣味嘛,金格也是贊,風(fēng)趣可愛又獨(dú)立自主,難得痕跡又淡。愛情也要建立在獨(dú)立的人格之上,做不了自己怎么可能得到屬于自己的愛情?
FINALLY OSCARS
1940年的電影已經(jīng)告訴我們灰姑娘這種童話故事往往終結(jié)于生活真正開始的地方。Beautiful Ginger Rogers
說句不著調(diào)的:上世紀(jì)三四十年代美國王漫妮的愛情生活故事。
不是每一個(gè)沒有太多才華卻頑固偏激的女人都像Kitty Foyle 那么幸運(yùn),在最后時(shí)刻仍有選擇的余地。
糾結(jié)但不矯情的三角戀,鮮明而自然的角色設(shè)定,俊美的臉蛋兒更讓人入戲。Dennis Morgan, James Craig
過去的就讓他滾 來來回回不像樣
有沒有人覺得Dennis Morgan的角色很令人反感?
很迷琴逑的發(fā)亮大眼&高挑氣質(zhì),通片看下來編排還蠻棒的,情節(jié)上有點(diǎn)像瓊瑤的《秋歌》。承認(rèn)吧,愛在階級(jí)面前大部分時(shí)候還是要低頭的,你怎么能指望生活事業(yè)完全仰仗豪門的男主闊少跟女主過窮日子呢?琴逑最后的離開很是瀟灑明智,只是40s初就加入懷孕墮胎元素未免太偶像劇了。2020.08.01-08.03
雖然喜歡Ginger但是她這次拿奧斯卡應(yīng)該是沾了角色的光,不是說她表現(xiàn)不好,但是同一年提名的女演員都非常好,不過Kitty這個(gè)角色癡情熱情專情,結(jié)尾選擇婚姻家庭,符合被辜負(fù)的好女人形象。電影整體挺中規(guī)中矩的那種好看,幾次雪球閃回到后來有點(diǎn)疲勞
Ginger就算專門拍劇情片也會(huì)是個(gè)很好的演員,跟Fred在一起拍歌舞片是有點(diǎn)壓制了她的表演天賦的。
3.5/5 可惜了啊 這本子給塞克拍 能高個(gè)檔次啊
Ginger依然是心中性感女神,越老越有味道,本片一舉獲得年度最佳室友,年度最尷尬約會(huì),年度最成熟21歲,年度最佳陸毅模仿秀四項(xiàng)提名,其中年度最佳陸毅模仿秀這個(gè)獎(jiǎng)項(xiàng)拿獎(jiǎng)幾乎沒有懸念