Thrusting audience into America’s ‘50s suburbia of contentment, where behind the closed doors, inconceivable horrors lurk within a perfect nuclear family, actor-turned-director Bob Balaban’s first directorial effort PARENTS is a black comedy/horror melange that walks a tight rope in balancing the tonal shifts, and it is satisfactorily effective.
Displaced by his family’s recent move, 10-year-old Michael Laemie (Madorsky) is a gawky kid who inclines to keep to himself, haunted by morbid thoughts and gory nightmares, he begins to suspect his parents (Quaid and Hurt) might be cannibals. Are they or aren’t they? Balaban’s film taunts us with ambivalence, one moment, it appears everything is a figment of Michael’s wildest imagination, but when a slovenly, chain-smoking social worker (Dennis, looks out of sorts) is involved, murderous acts seems veracious.
Balaban’s satirical streak runs amok with a kid’s untrustworthy viewpoint, not least with the cozy but unsettling ending, intimating an affirmative answer to the big question mark hovering inside a viewer’s head. It also provides ample opportunity for him to effect sundry visual techniques - like split focus, 360 degree rotating long takes, black-and-white fuzzy shots, etc. - and horror tropes - a creepy cellar, a room full of cadavers, movable meat sausages, among others.
If the material is irrefutably dark, Oedipus complex is the prime mover behind Michael’s mortal repulsion toward his father, PARENTS also conspicuously basks in the sunny-side of normalcy, accompanied by easy listening tunes and a whiff of breeziness sent by Quaid, Hurt and others. Quaid is exceptionally good as a frustrated father, whose respectable, bland appearance flakes out bit by bit, and when he is pushed beside himself, he can be equally menacing with those chilling eyes behind spectacles; and Hurt adorns her domineering mannerism with exquisite daintiness, she is the mommy dearest to die for.
Largely ignored upon its release, PARENTS is worthy of a resurgence of acknowledgement for its transgressive portrayal of growing pains, or its flippant message to convert carnivores to vegetarians, either way, Balaban’s film is a hoot that sends up the none-too-bizarre bedfellows of respectability and perversion.
referential entries: Paul Bartel’s EATING RAOUL (1982, 6.9/10); Balaban’s BERNARD AND DORIS (2006, 6.5/10).
Title: Parents
Year: 1989
Genre: Comedy, Horror, Mystery
Country: Canada, USA
Language: English
Director: Bob Balaban
Screenwriter: Christopher Hawthorne
Music: Jonathan Elias
Cinematography: Ernest Day, Robin Vidgeon
Editing: Bill Pankow
Cast:
Randy Quaid
Mary Beth Hurt
Bryan Madorsky
Sandy Dennis
London Juno
Kathryn Grody
Deborah Rush
Graham Jarvis
Rating: 6.8/10
不知道要表達什么,純粹就是屬于自己的cult片,但結果是令觀眾拍手稱快的,可最后爺爺奶奶也一樣是吃人肉的,這就不知道導演到底想表達什么了。不過很有可能他是媽媽和其他男人的私生子?但是最后爺爺卻說他長的像爸爸?這可能并不是我們需要在意的問題。可能導演唯一想告訴觀眾的是:人的一切行為和思想不是與生俱來的,而是會被環(huán)境所影響的,相信邁克的爸爸小時候也像邁克經歷了父母吃人肉的恐怖行為,但他爸最終還是被父母同化,但邁克卻沒有,他始終保持了內心應有的恐懼,而不是失去對這種應有恐懼的敬畏,他沒有被同化成食人魔。雖然從小我們就被鼓勵要克服恐懼,使自己變得更強大,但對一些不該觸碰的東西,我們一定要保持敬畏之心。什么東西不該碰?相信正常人心里應該都有數吧??
還有,小男孩的演技很好。
總得來說,純粹就是cult片,不用去理會結局的含義。但對于cult片,評分主要看創(chuàng)意,劇情和寓意不用管,我覺得值四顆星。
To me It's about childhood fears, anxieties and tensions with parents. The music and the set are brilliant. And it's a very unique role Randy played, among his typical drunk father(but with love from daughter)..
如果把結局拍成男孩的臆想 就成了兒童精神分析學的范本 對父母性愛和肉類的恐懼投射 表現主義手法展示男孩的夢境和心理對于父親的抵觸 和父親總作為施暴方的形象出現 也算是為弗洛伊德性學背書 末段處理得太過模糊 揮動曲棍球桿和棒球桿的特寫組接嚴重誤導 血紅色鏡頭和配樂不錯
6.0 和yad在毛概課一起看的。一邊聽俊奎教授講段子一邊看的。看完我說“很無聊”,他說“看不懂”。老師說“印度的星巴克杯子小。”
父母皆禍害真人版,另一個觀摩殺人魔的絕佳角度
50年代的恐懼癥,片中的夢境拍攝的實在是迷幻啊~~~~~~
節(jié)奏有點太慢了,以及結尾硬是主持了正義有點刻意(不喜歡...。),除此之外真的是一個挺可愛的中產家庭背景氛圍恐怖片。
重金屬超標的肉醬~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(⊙o⊙)哦~
很喜歡,畫面風格、顏色、鏡頭等。孩子眼里的世界是直接的,是什么就是什么,沒有社會禮儀和教化的蹩腳解釋,也沒有硬生生的自以為的幽默感,所以當一個孩子發(fā)現父母的飲食異樣、行為異樣,他會懷疑并不斷恐懼。很多被忽視的細節(jié)都將影響一個孩子的成長。
導演玩深沉玩崩了吧?文藝的莫名其妙,真要睡著
一個小孩因為挑食導致父母慘死的悲劇故事【根本不是?;孟牒同F實區(qū)分度太小,看得糊里糊涂。
https://www.bilibili.com/video/av47579081這不是喜劇片吧,一點都不覺得好笑。在這樣的家庭長大,這孩子心理有問題,成年之后也許會不正常。https://www.bilibili.com/video/av49711396兒子從沒吃過肉,因為父母從不買肉,可家里卻每天有肉吃https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV1BK4y1C79g
劇情不用深究就是一部荒誕小品
把對成人世界里父母的性愛當做恐懼的來源,對應幻想成食人的可怖,再添加小女孩的恐嚇式洗腦,無知的孩子仿佛陷入了不知所措的泥潭中??稍緺I造的所謂幻覺并非幻覺。當父母真的在吃人,那孩子所遇見一切的場景會是多么可怕。
配樂和色彩都很棒 濃濃的50S Feel 節(jié)奏不太好 前半段快看不下去 這哪里“黑色幽默”了? 明明是一個有俄狄浦斯情結的正宗恐怖片好嗎 只不過真相體現得有些模棱兩可
8/10 陰暗,極具幽默感,濃厚且多元化的隱喻及象徵,高強度的情感表達,非常有趣!目前看過唯一憑藉電影本身給出的所有線索仍無從判斷導演意圖的複雜劇情片;如果鏡頭角度給得再漂亮些,完全可以9/10。DVD的導演短訪談中對於幾種真相的設定非常有意思。
不知道《約書亞》是否受到這部電影視角上的啟發(fā),我個人是聯想在一起了,基本八十年代末的影像風格,現在看起來有些傷心悅目,這也算是調色和心理有一種互動,這個電影沒有什么賣弄感,這一點使我覺得很友好,難得的將心理暗示等等元素就是在故事中講出來,不去做特別多的賣弄式的解讀,所以影片反而有一種溫柔的美。
如果說夢是無意識得以顯現之所,而無意識又是被主體壓抑的結果,那無意識或夢也就不在是某種虛幻的假象,恰恰相反,它(夢)是某種現實的映射。另外男孩目視到父母的性愛場景,這在男孩的世界與眼中,其與食人的父母同樣是不可理解與不可知的,而這兩種不可知在男孩的腦中相互交融,在夢中在無意識中重復著體驗著,使其陷入焦慮與恐懼當中。
#吃人爸媽#以小孩視角講了一個黑色童話故事,很有《閃靈》的范兒。自閉內向迷離夢境,人肉包子,爸媽異類,黑暗中盯著天花板的裂縫織造恐懼。或許每個人都有那么一段童年夢魘。本片鏡頭也相當出色,復古優(yōu)雅的畫面基調,輕松詼諧的配樂(用@QQ音樂 搖了幾首),剛好反襯主題的迷幻怪異。不錯的心理片~
始終覺得是在講一個孩子的童年幻想,里面廚房水池里跳舞的手和冰箱上流下的血如果是在我小時候看大概會害怕好久吧。里面媽媽好漂亮,音樂真不錯
想到弗洛伊德的理論