其實就我個人看了幾十遍左右的鬼玩人系列總結(jié)出的結(jié)論，總有人說鬼玩人1跟2是分開的兩部獨立電影，不是連接在一起的電影，而我個人認為鬼玩人1，2是連在一起的，下面我就講一下個人的推論與證據(jù)

證據(jù)1：第一部結(jié)尾的艾許被附身與第二部開場被附身，這個應該是明眼人都能看出來的

證據(jù)2：第二部艾許的衣服跟開場與女友在一起時不一樣，明顯身上都有許多粘液與血液，剛好跟第一部結(jié)尾血戰(zhàn)眾魔后見到太陽的艾許服裝一樣

證據(jù)3：第一部艾許被惡魔化妹妹艾什麗抓傷的左腿，第二部一直都存在艾許的左腿上

所以大概可以腦洞一下，其實第一部與第二部的艾許是同一人，只是在第一部結(jié)尾后，也就是第二部艾許被惡魔附身后被推出去砸在樹上時，記憶被惡魔篡改了或者說因為被砸在樹上，艾許失去了一部分記憶，所以第二部開場直至艾許被附身時，其實都可以算是艾許大腦受到了損傷，而觸動大腦的自我防衛(wèi)機制或者惡魔篡改了艾許關于自己血戰(zhàn)惡魔化的妹妹，朋友們的記憶，使其忘記戰(zhàn)斗記憶，好在第二部玩弄艾許，所以這就能解釋第二部艾許在遇見惡魔化的金發(fā)教授為何會像去逛商城一樣淡定去找把斧頭來剁了他，畢竟第一部的血戰(zhàn)群魔的肌肉記憶還在，就算暫時忘記了血戰(zhàn)群魔的記憶，如何殺死惡魔化人的記憶還是有的，這點后面在美劇中也能體現(xiàn)出來，第一部與第二部是連接在一起的（PS.其實美劇是要以第三部結(jié)尾來拍的，結(jié)果卻因為沒版權所以只是簡單略過了第三部劇情，將重點放在一二部上）

2018年StudioCanal推出了《鬼玩人2》的4K重制版，藍光鐵盒涵蓋了UHD+BD+Bonus Disc（同為藍光），花絮碟收錄了許多珍貴花絮、訪談，今天我們來講一講它刪節(jié)了哪些畫面.

在YouTube上以及歐洲某些限量發(fā)行版里曾經(jīng)出現(xiàn)過刪節(jié)片段或是加長版這回事兒，無非是將花絮里的片段提取出來加入到正片內(nèi)，而這些片段由于并未制作（大部分是以DV方式記錄，器材拍攝片段可能丟失）所以畫質(zhì)極其差，此次的花絮碟中收錄了刪節(jié)花絮，下面一起來盤點一下

刪節(jié)1:被附身的Ed被砍成碎塊

這段場景主要是在Ed被附身后，Ash拿起斧子將其砍得支離破碎，Ed被砍的四肢在地上擺動，被砍下的半個頭上的眼睛還在眨（此處Ash有一句對白：快把電鋸打開，我們需要把它肢解）

刪節(jié)2:Ash處理傷口

這段場景中Ash拿起壁爐中燒紅的鏟子對準傷口（接著是肉烤焦的聲音）

刪節(jié)3:Linda的舌吻

這段場景中Ash坐在搖椅上，此時一顆人頭（Linda）掉在他懷中，人頭伸出變異的舌頭，舌頭伸長進入Ash口中來了一場惡心又好笑的舌吻

刪節(jié)4:Linda的膽汁

這段場景中，Linda的頭顱被夾在臺虎鉗上，口中吐出綠色液體（膽汁）

刪節(jié)5:附身Ash吃掉松鼠

這段場景中，附身Ash被關在屋外，在進入房子的途中一邊發(fā)狂一遍嘶吼，然后抓到了一只松鼠，并且對其撕咬

刪節(jié)6:鼓動的臉部

Ash撿到項鏈后開始掙扎，此時是一組臉部特寫，他臉上開始鼓動，傷口膨脹張開又合上.

刪節(jié)7:Henrietta的眼睛

當教授念咒語時，坐在他背后的在搖椅上織毛衣的Henrietta被附身，眼睛變白，詭異地笑著

最后，我很抱歉不能給各位截下寶貴動圖，我的筆記本和臺式機都沒有光驅(qū)，也不能提取資源分享，只能在電視上觀賞后以文字的形式展現(xiàn)給大家.那么之后我也會陸續(xù)更新一些藍光花絮，希望能夠幫助到這部片子的影迷們

看了Roger Ebert在上映當年寫的影評，發(fā)現(xiàn)是這一部電影啟發(fā)了一種新的類型，披著恐怖片外衣的血漿喜劇片。Sam Raimi把血腥的鏡頭大雜燴之后營造的黑色幽默非常天才。Roger Ebert說這是一部“about bad taste”的電影，很精妙的評論。

順手搬一下原文。 Evil Dead 2: Dead by Dawn movie review (1987) | Roger Ebert

"Evil Dead 2: Dead by Dawn" is a comedy disguised as a blood-soaked shock-a-rama. It looks superficially like a routine horror movie, a vomitorium designed to separate callow teenagers from their lunch. But look a little closer and you'll realize that the movie is a fairly sophisticated satire. Level One viewers will say it's in bad taste. Level Two folks like myself will perceive that it is about bad taste.

The plot: Visitors to a cottage in the Michigan woods discover a rare copy of the Book of the Dead and accidentally invoke evil spirits. The spirits run amok, disemboweling and vivisecting their victims. The hero battles manfully with the dread supernatural forces, but he is no match for the unspeakably vile creatures in the basement, in the woods and behind every door.

This story is told with wall-to-wall special effects. Skeletons dance in the moonlight. Heads spin on top of bodies. Hands go berserk and start attacking their owners. After they are chopped off, they have a life of their own. Heads are clamped into vises and squashed. Blood sprays all over everything. Guts spill. Slime spews. If nauseating images of horrific gore are not, as they say, your cup of tea, the odds are good you will not have a great time during this movie.

On the other hand, if you know it's all special effects, and if you've seen a lot of other movies and have a sense of humor, you might have a great time at "Evil Dead 2." I did - up to a point. The movie devours ideas at such a prodigious rate that it begins to repeat itself toward the end, but the first 45 minutes have a kind of manic, inspired genius to them.

Consider, for example, the scene where the hero severs his hand from his body and the hand takes on a life of its own, attacking him. Leave out the blood and the gore and a few of the details, and this entire sequence builds like a tribute to the Three Stooges. Consider the scene where the hero attaches a chain saw to what's left of his amputated arm. Disgusting, right? But the director, Sam Raimi, approaches it as a sly jab at the way Robert De Niro armed himself in "Taxi Driver."

I'm not suggesting that "Evil Dead 2" is fun merely because you can spot the references to other movies. It is because (a) the violence and gore are carried to such an extreme that they stop being disgusting and become surrealistic; (b) the movie's timing aims for comedy, not shocks, and (c) the grubby, low-budget intensity of the film gives it a lovable quality that high-tech movies wouldn't have.

There is one shot in the film that is some kind of masterpiece. There is a force out there in the woods. We never see it, but we see things from its point of view. In one long and very complex unbroken point-of-view shot, this force roars through the woods, flattens everything, crashes through the cabin door, and roars through room after room with invincible savagery, chasing the hero until.... But I wouldn't dream of giving away the joke.