波頓是一個律師,他受人委托為一起土著謀殺案擔(dān)任法律援助律師,他隱約覺得這起死亡案件蹊蹺,可是,就像不停的雨一樣他看不清事物的狀態(tài)。在導(dǎo)演的影像里土著代表著原始神秘主義,部落對于城市現(xiàn)代化而言猶如書中對土著的介紹:久遠(yuǎn)而不知。
部落文化對于殖民的歐洲人而言是無法介入的原始,他們有著自己的處理問題方式和懲戒規(guī)則,這是一個獨(dú)立的體系,有著遠(yuǎn)古的回聲。然而白人的體系代表著歐洲的文明,這種優(yōu)越感讓他們總是將土著當(dāng)成蒙昧而愚蠢的。白人希望教化他們卻導(dǎo)致了更多的對立,他們無法溝通是因為歷史和文化背景的不同。
在波頓處理這個案子的時候,一個在他夢境里出現(xiàn)的土著克里斯在現(xiàn)實里出現(xiàn)了,預(yù)感?還是詭秘,波頓的判定迷失了。為了了解土著他讓克里斯去他家吃飯。克里斯帶來了巫師查理,查理告訴波頓他前景不妙,將信將疑的波頓陷入了恍惚,惡夢卻揮之不去,一些和夢境有關(guān)的物件在現(xiàn)實里出現(xiàn)。認(rèn)定自己是文明人的他渴望戰(zhàn)勝查理的巫術(shù)。
Title: The Last Wave
Year: 1977
Country: Australia
Language: English, Italian, Aboriginal
Genre: Drama, Fantasy, Mystery
Director: Peter Weir
Screenwriters: Peter Weir, Tony Morphett, Petru Popescu
Music: Groove Myers
Cinematography: Russell Boyd
Editing: Max Lemon
Cast:
Richard Chamberlain
Olivia Hamnett
David Gulpilil
Nandjiwarra Amagula
Peter Carroll
Frederick Parslow
Vivean Gray
Wallas Eaton
Hedley Cullen
Rating: 7.0/10
There is a telling moment in Peter Weir’s third feature THE LAST WAVE, when Anne (Hamnett) descries Charlie (Amagula) standing and regarding outside her home, her knee-jerk reaction is to freak out, ordering her two young daughters to go upstairs and hide. Does that feel strange? Charlie was in her house as a dinner guest (albeit uninvited) the day before, and apparently the dinner went well if the atmosphere wasn’t particularly chummy. So even before sussing out Charlie’s motive, Anne is overpowered by mortal fear simply on account of his appearance, and why it that? I forget to mention, Anne is a Caucasian woman and Charlie is an Aborigine, so the answer is self-evident.
Oscillating between white man’s burden and the conscientious guilt of barbaric colonization, for any white filmmaker, to contend with a racially sensitive story is a double-edged task. Among the Antipodean cinema, only the recent Jennifer Kent’s THE NIGHTINGALE (2018) manages to find a felicitous formulation with a more revolutionary angle. THE LAST WAVE is made in 1977, so we couldn’t expect Weir to be too progressive in his perspective, and in fact, like PICNIC AT HANGING ROCK (1975), he is more inclined to unpick the mysticism as a way to venerate the Aborigine’s immemorial legacy and culture.
Audience’s proxy is a Sydney-based white lawyer David Burton (Chamberlain), Anne’s husband, who is inexplicably embroiled in a manslaughter case of a city Aborigine, which is not even his field, he specializes in corporate taxation. But, he is the “chosen” one because of his psychic ability of experiencing “dreamtime”, a concept believed by the tribal Aborigines, and which Weir and his co-scribes dumb down as “David has the power of foreseeing futurity in his dreams”. Aided by one of the more forthcoming aboriginal offenders, Chris (Gulpilil), David is bent on finding out why he is “special” and arouses the vigilance from the tribal shaman, the said Charlie. But eventually, in lieu of fabricating some tenuous connexion between David and the tribe, Weir chooses a more metaphysical solution, the titular apocalyptic wave that threatens to send off the entire humanity. However, it is less a cop-out than an artistic license, as the script is a cul-de-sac, there is no place for a white-bread man here.
Aurally and visually, THE LAST WAVE continues Weir’s striking applications of dissonant foley effects and meteorological special effects, like the hailstones that opens the film, or the scene of a horrific underwater premonition.
Chamberlain is a dedicative and charismatic leading man even the story short-changes his character, once his lean, handsome four-squareness is encroached by monomania, twinges of torment and despair are visualized in his face, David’s quest for the truth can retrospectively and all too easily, be read as a queer Chamberlain’s seeking out an answer of why he is not like others, and the answer is an overwhelming elemental force.
In the supporting roles, Hamnett is worth her salts as a perturbed wife, but a young Gulpilil really lights up the screen, asserts himself with effortless civility and dignity, but also excellently registers Chris’ inner turmoil when he apparently betrays his tribe, should he have been elected as our main focal point, the movie would have been a more tub-thumping curio for today’s audience.
referential entries: Weir’s WITNESS (1985, 7.1/10), PICNIC AT HANGING ROCK (1975, 8.9/10); Fred Schepisi’s A CRY IN THE DARK (1988, 6.9/10); Jennifer Kent’s THE NIGHTINGALE (2018, 8.3/10).
The Last Wave complicate the distinction between European and Indigenous Peoples on narrative, aesthetic, and ideological levels:
The film goes back and forth between the judicial process of the colonizers and the tribal laws of the aboriginals, showing how the murder case is complicated amid two law systems. We are invited to piece together the truth with both the information we get through the lawyer and the tribal wall painting we see in the end, but these two sources of information are scrambled together, so that we can’t differentiate them. There are many scenes and images in the film that suggest this intermingling. When it rains heavily outside, which the aboriginals take as an apocalyptic sign, the lawyer’s house is also flooded with tub water. There is an interesting image early in the film where a man on the street drinks water from a tab while holding an umbrella to shield him from rainwater, suggesting the hypocrisy or ludicrousness of differentiating between the two kinds of water. The lawyer’s dream or fantasy are intercutted with real scenes to blur the line between reality and imagination, but also between the colonizers’ world of rationality and the aboriginals’ world of tribal mysteries. The aboriginal beliefs finally influence the lawyer’s recognition of self, thus fully creeping into the colonizers’ world.
However, The Last Wave still maintains dominant cultural hierarchies.
The social statuses of the colonizers and the aboriginals are not equal, with the white protagonist being a respectable lawyer, having decent suits… etc. The lawyer and his family also take up more theatrical space and time, with most stories and fantasies happening in THEIR house or THEIR court, allowing them to “play a home game” and making it easier for audience to identify with them. The reverse only happens intermittently and in the end, when the lawyer no longer has control over his own house. Over the course, only the lawyer has the ability to freeze the narrative and make us ascent into his inner world, like fantasy or dreams. The ending is an example, where we the lawyer’s meditation concludes the whole story. It’s also interesting to me that even at the end, I think the audience are still not sure of what really happens. The aboriginal culture remains a “dark continent” or a mystery, open to (colonizers’) exploration and objectification.
騷悶,十分不提氣
神秘主義,土著問題,沒看太明白
又是一個末日預(yù)言,這次將瑪雅文化和澳洲土著聯(lián)系到了一起,澳洲土著成了某個瑪雅預(yù)言的守護(hù)者,張伯倫扮演的這個角色出生在南美生活在澳洲成為連接兩種文化的重要樞紐。或許也可以把他看做是一部另類的環(huán)保電影,白人們侵占了土著的世界,破壞了他們的文明,破壞了生態(tài)平衡。。。
沒看懂。
現(xiàn)實,夢境,土著,文明,交織纏綿在一起
7.9 水為貫穿全片的意象。末日圖景的美麗,如果進(jìn)入了便會深陷其中。神秘、緩慢、晦澀卻足夠悶死一堆人。
彼得·威爾對于神秘主義的愛好繼續(xù)加深,水、夢境、創(chuàng)世和滅世、異文化的土著人、圖騰和禁忌,都是極度符合這種傾向的元素。
9/10
也許時間起浪,穿越過夢境化雨傾瀉,那之前我在何處?也許身土成洞,塌陷了生路如墓掩埋,在最后問你是誰?3.5
02.11.2009 電影課之【原始神秘主義,宗教迷信科學(xué)】。大導(dǎo)Peter Weir早期藝術(shù)作品。各種符號,夢境,土著文明,非常神秘詭異甚至些許晦澀同時又非常吸引人。值得一看。
謀殺,神秘,懸念,驚悚…雨、水、浪還有土著人……
水的象徵可塑性。用一種看起來很類型、很具象,卻又裝得神秘兮兮的方式,展開自我認(rèn)同的探索,可惜對「正義」白人律師及「恐怖」原住民的再現(xiàn)仍落入窠臼,豈不有點(diǎn)自我矛盾…
節(jié)奏拖沓 情節(jié)混亂 不明白為什么被選入CC
男主角曾經(jīng)演過《荊棘鳥》,樣貌不俗,還真以為他生長在澳洲,一看資料,是個加州土著。那這份澳洲氣質(zhì)還真是難得。人類有太多未解之謎,現(xiàn)在的科學(xué)水平無法解釋。
好片。頂頂好的電影。澳大利亞電影對民俗的欲說換休真的絕了。
和《懸崖上的野餐》一樣,也是一部原始神秘主義電影,澳大利亞這塊神秘的大陸太過吸引彼得·韋爾了,這樣的題材還不知道有多少。如果這種神秘力量真的存在的話,電影恐怖要成為一些人的頂禮膜拜的對象了。
除了神秘主義那一套外,還有一層心理精神分析可以解釋男主的執(zhí)拗。
澳大利亞的神秘主義,一樁真相飄忽的兇殺案件。彼得·威爾是營造懸疑、恐怖氛圍的高手,一座現(xiàn)代化城市中,他不僅能夠找到真正的土著,還用了真正的神秘遺跡,更以城市中被隱藏的空間構(gòu)造了神秘通道。
太隱晦難懂了,這就是文化差異啊!
7.8/10。白人男主由于為一原住民被殺案件做律師而卷入了各種難以捉摸的詭秘風(fēng)波/血案。關(guān)鍵詞包括原住民與白人殖民者間的隔閡/矛盾。本片有表意有力(且很有神秘主義氛圍)的高水平攝影美術(shù),但作為傳統(tǒng)故事片本片敘事節(jié)奏很慢(雖然這種慢也增強(qiáng)了神秘的氛圍(同質(zhì)于《扎馬》)),扣1分。