1 ) 小弟的大學(xué)要求寫的影評(píng)
上課的時(shí)候教授要求寫的....參考了許多此板大大們的影評(píng)寫出來的...有興趣看看吧....:) [劇情透露]
Midnight Express Movie Review
Almost all great films about prison break are not simply action-packed ticket-sellers that seek to thrill the audience. What makes these films great is the depth they went into to explore the darkest and at the same time, the brightest themes of human society and lives. Corruption, violence, sexual abuse, justice, injustice, homosexuality, dignity, love, freedom and hope, all of which are seen throughout the whole film. The setting itself is another interesting topic, meaning the prison, like a microcosm of the society outside. Overall, the film tells a story of man's endeavor to self-redemption and self-justice against odds from the political and structural obstacles of the real world, despite a sensible political undertone against Islamic nations.
The Story
On October 6, 1970, Billy Hayes, an American is on a trip back to America from Turkey with his girlfriend Susan. While boarding a flight at the Istanbul Airport, Billy is caught smuggling 2 kilos of dope. He is told by the authorities that if he cooperates in finding the actual drug dealer he will be released. For some reasons he tries to escape after the assistance and is captured. With the support from the American embassy, he is sentenced to only over four years for possession of drug, but is exempted from the more serious charges of smuggling and drug dealing.
The prison as expected is not a very hospitable place. It is crowded, filthy and ruled over by Warden Hamidou who punishes the prisoners with harsh physical and mental tortures. Billy, however, does manage to befriend a few inmates, an American named Jimmy, who is imprisoned for stealing candlesticks from a mosque, and an English named Max, who is sentenced for over 12 years for smuggling 100 grams of drug. At this point, it is becoming obvious that foreign prisoners are only tools and sacrifices in political maneuvers between the Turkish government and other Western governments. The only seeming way out is to catch the "midnight express", namely prison break. The inmates start planning the escape routes.
Many of their attempts failed, and the “insider” prisoner Rifki informs Hamidou on their scheme. Jimmy is taken away to brutal punishment. Max and Billy take revenge to Rifki by destroying his dashed money. Without any evidence, however, Rifki frames Max, and Max meets a similar fate as Tommy does. As Billy is told the court resentence him to up to 30 years in prison on drug smuggling, he cannot contain his emotions any longer. He attacks Rifki and bites off part of his tongue.
After many months in the prison ward for the insane, Billy is at the brink of total breakdown. This is when his girlfriend Susan visits and delivers him her love, hope to survive and some cash hidden within a photography book. Billy starts to plan to escape again. He bribes the Warden and asks to be transferred to the sanatorium where there is a chance of escaping. Instead, Hamidou drags Billy to a cell, beats him down and tries to rape him. In despair, Billy kills Hamidou and escapes with the Warden’s outfit. And it is revealed that Billy flees to Greece and flies his way back to The States and the reunion with his family.
Justice and Injustice
Often times when we try to define justice and injustice, we resort to the laws, which supposedly take into account the moral standards of a given society. But this is not necessary when the government takes other things onto their priority list such as their power of control, political stability, economic interests and in this case, political maneuvers with foreign nations. Under such conditions, laws can no longer uphold justice but become a tool wielded by the government for their own propuses.
In the movie, it is revealed that Nixon’s US government is at bad terms with the Turkish government. As a result foreign prisoners become valuable assets to the Turkish government in dealing with The US. In a beginning of the film, passengers for international flights not only need to pass through normal airport checking routines, before they board, soldiers also search their bodies one by one, and Billy is then found carrying dope. Let Billy’s personal case aside, this measure is questionable. It might be due to the Turkish government’s tightened measures against drug-smuggling, but it might very well be a political measure to attain more foreign prisoners.
In the prison, Billy learns that many foreign inmates are serving unreasonable sentence years. It might be the result of difference in customary laws regarding crimes in different countries, but it might as well be a way to retain the government’s valuable assets, as Billy after almost finishing serving his initial sentence, faces serious charges of smuggling and is resentenced up to 30 years in jail. It makes one wonder what causes such an abrupt change, could it be the result of a worsen diplomatic relationship with Turkey and The US? Either way, justice is vague. Should a man of a certain sociocultural upbringing face criminal charges in a different sociocultural background? Where is justice for individuals when they are of only small part of a much bigger scheme?
Billy, at his defense in court against smuggling charges, says “What is crime, what is punishment? It seems to vary from time to time, from place to place. What’s legal today is suddenly illegal tomorrow because some society says so. What’s illegal yesterday is legal today because everybody’s doing it. They can’t put everybody in jail.” Ironically it seems that his words are not even translated properly to the judge, assuming the judge does not speak English. So if the system does not grant individual justice, the only justice one can find is through self-redemption, a prison break, a breach through the system. This is the underlying premise in most prison break stories from “Shawshank Redemption” in 1995 to the hit American TV series “Prison Break” and to “The Next Three Days” in 2010. These screenplays’ success implies an unshakable belief in moral justice that most people uphold but is often disregarded due to different sociopolitical or cultural circumstances.
Prison and Society
One might expect prison to be a place of rehibilitation and reeducation for the social deviated so that they can be reassimilated back to the society. In reality, however, prison is hardly such a place in a sense that it has its own power control, hierarchy, division that works like ethnicity and nationality, social rules and taboos. The prison with all these elements as a whole is but a microcosm of the society that it derived from. Similar to Marxist's idea of the base and the superstructure, people with a certain set of sociocultural upbringings recreate the prison to be functional in the same way as the society does.
In the prison in "Midnight Express", ethnic or racial division is not clearly observed due to the relative narrow ethnic spectrum of the Turks, so the most prominent division is between the local and the foreign. The prison in America, however, as observed in "The Shawshank Redemption" or "The Next Three Days", is devided mostly among the white, the black, the Asian and the Mexican. This reveals the exact same way the respective societies devide themselves. What does not change is human's tendency to corruption, and this is seen very clearly in the film. When Billy's father comes to Turkey to hire a local lawyer in Billy's defence, the lawyer tells them that with money favourable court and judge can be arraged, and it does seem to work out seeing that Billy is only doing 4 years without serious charges of drug-smuggling.
It is the same trick but different places.
Hope and Prison
In "The Shawshank Redemption" Morgan Freeman speaks of "Institutionalization", and likewise Al Pacino in "Carlito's Way" talks about his thoughts on prison "You don't get reformed, you just run out of wind." The harsh reality in prison strips a man off everything he ever possesses that can define himself. Your possession is gone when you go in jail, your connections fade as family, friends and lover slowly drift away, your dignity is no more when someone forces you to fellatio, and hope is perhaps the most important thing above all, that once lost dooms a man.
One can see how devastated Billy is after hearing he is resentenced to more than 30 years in jail for smuggling. A hope for freedom taken away like that can drive anyone mad. Jimmy loses himself fanatically trying to escape and meets a gruesome end, and Max withers to a walking corpse after too much torture. Even out of prison, one has not really left the prison. The old man Brook's tragic suicide in "The Shawshank Redemption" proves just that. If Susan does not come to visit Billy and gives him the desire and hope to survive and self-rescue, it is not difficult to imagine how his fate will be sealed. Andy Dufresne says in his letter to Red "Hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things." It indeed is despite the various sociocultural background that an individual might be from.
The American Bias and Propaganda
From most modern and western point of view, the escape of Billy from prison might strike one as of a noble cause or is it? In the film, it is depicted that many foreigners are imprisoned on heavy sentences due to but "relatively" mild criminal deeds. Based on American standards, these sentences are unjust and barbaric, but is judicial freedom and independence not so highly upheld by the so-called democratic America? A few years back, The US president Clinton personally arrived in Singapore and successfully intervened with a case of a teenager being sentenced to caning. Such action is never seen among The States, but it however could be applied outside The US judicial boundaries.
Corruption is considered a despicable crime in America, who often times criticizes other non-western countries for their corrupted bureaucracy and judiciary. However, in "Midnight Express" Billy and his father's maneuvers to bribe the authorities for more favorable courts and judge are considered a justified mean to a noble end. This image of direct involvement in a corrupt judiciary system proves hypocritical to what The US government advocates.
In an interview with the real Billy Hayes, based on whose story this film was shot, he revealed that contrary to what is depicted in the film, the prison guards and wardens were mostly fair and hard-working, and only one guard as he recalled punished prisoners for whatever reasons. In reality, Billy did not kill anyone, and the Rifki character was solely created for the film, and the antagonist Warden Hamious did not die by Billy's hand but was shot to death by a discharged prisoner. After learning these facts, it makes one wonder if "Midnight Express" is but an American propaganda against Islamic or Arabic nations. Ironically, the film was allowed to be screened in Turkey. No matter the purposes the film was made for, artistic or commercial, it is not easy to ignore the sociocultural background of the place of production.
Other
The film's heart-wrenching soundtrack composed by Giorgio Moroder won both the Academy Awards and the Golden Globes for Best Original Score in 1979. Although the score is scarcely scattered through the film, leaving most of the scenes unaccompanied, it however adds more sense of realism and the occasional Arabic tunes display perfectly the Islamic setting of the film. The most memorable themes are the love theme and the ending theme which are very fitting and moving.
Cast-wise, Brad Davis for the role of Billy Hayes, Irene Miracle for the role of Susan and John Hurt for the role of Max received highly positive critics, winning respective Golden Globes awards for the year. Sadly, Brad Davis died of AIDS complications in 1991 at the age of 41, leaving his wife and only child.
2 ) 1978年 電影 Midnight Express - 午夜快車
1978年 電影 Midnight Express - 午夜快車
(觀後感)
片名:Midnight Express - 午夜快車
美國(guó)上映:1978年10月6日
香港上映:1978
導(dǎo)演:Alan Parker (1944-uk)
編劇:Oliver Stone (1946-usa) (真實(shí)故事)
演員:Brad Davis(1949-1991-usa), Irene Miracle(1954-usa), Bo Hopkins(1942)
每當(dāng)看完一齣好電影,心情都非常滿足。
就如昨晚看了 1978年 的 Midnight Express 午夜快車。
Giorgio Moroder - Chase 和 Theme 這兩首曲。
兒時(shí)也不知道從那裡打進(jìn)自己的耳朵,成為了經(jīng)典而非常棒的音樂。
看著這個(gè)真實(shí)故事的劇情,心裡說(讚),口裡說(好)!
每次都一樣,看到好的舊片,總會(huì)加上一句,現(xiàn)在才看...
先說一下劇情:-
在 1970年,一位美國(guó)年輕人在土耳其機(jī)場(chǎng)因運(yùn)毒而被捕。
有關(guān)當(dāng)局警方盤問他的毒品來源,並告訴他,只要協(xié)助他們,成功逮捕毒品的源頭,就能釋放他。
可是年輕人輕率魯莽而試著逃亡但失敗,於是開啟了漫長(zhǎng)的異地牢獄生涯,為期四年。
獄中生活當(dāng)然不好受,還要在土耳其這個(gè)劣根性的國(guó)家。
除了面對(duì)殘酷成性的監(jiān)獄守衛(wèi),還有同窗的奸詐囚犯。
雖然當(dāng)中仍然有不少性情中人作伴,也曾提議一起逃獄,
年輕人當(dāng)然拒絕,因?yàn)樗O(jiān)禁只是四年,若被逮捕,加監(jiān)三五七年等閒事。
難捱的日子終於過去,刑期快將屆滿之際,監(jiān)獄有通知他的案件重審,監(jiān)禁不是四年,而是終身監(jiān)禁...
一場(chǎng)惡夢(mèng)才真正開始,逃獄不得不在他的念頭,而且要快。
就是這樣,展開了一場(chǎng)午夜快車...
電影看完了。
心裡很讚嘆!
首先,先說一下我家裡有位(電影蟲隱士),經(jīng)常鞭撻我,時(shí)間有限,應(yīng)該看什麼,不應(yīng)該看什麼...
就像這齣午夜快車,是他力推~ 盡管看了,還是陪我看,(應(yīng)該說,是要我看?。?br>
開場(chǎng)不久,那經(jīng)典的音樂 (Theme)隨即而來,把我的投入感推上了一層。
男主角 Brad Davis 出場(chǎng),那輕率、犯法而任性的性格演繹,判囚、對(duì)抗、呆坐、失落、至絕望。
整個(gè)過程,看到他的演繹變化,做得相當(dāng)好。
導(dǎo)演:Alan Parker 把故事說得透徹,尤其在土耳其那場(chǎng)語(yǔ)言不通的法庭戲,不合理的法律制度。
看到男主角默默接受這場(chǎng)審判,極為諷刺的語(yǔ)言和精神強(qiáng)暴。
男主角有兩段感情戲,非常簡(jiǎn)短,卻令人深刻與大膽。
幸好我看的版本沒有被刪剪去。
盡管說這故事加了虛構(gòu)而醜化土耳其國(guó)家,但都不重要。
因?yàn)槭冀K看了一場(chǎng)好的電影。
原著小說是當(dāng)事人 Billy Hayes 編寫的。
不過現(xiàn)在才知道,以前看的 1987年電影 監(jiān)獄風(fēng)雲(yún),周潤(rùn)發(fā)咬掉張耀揚(yáng)耳朵的一整幕,原來九成似這齣 1978年的午夜快車,不論是角度,鏡頭,演員的姿勢(shì)。
相信他們也十分喜愛這電影,或他向原創(chuàng)者致敬。
還有心情:
年輕人也好,成年人也好,做任何事前要三思,犯法的真不要做,不要貪圖小利,真的會(huì)終身後悔,多多錢也不要。
*男主角Brad Davis跟 Brad Bitt
Brad Davis
Brad Bitt
導(dǎo)演:Alan Parker (1944-uk)
編?。篛liver Stone (1946-usa)
* 跟隨著 午夜快車 的原聲音樂,邊寫下這小文,寫意的。
力推的電影!
多謝你看了這篇小文章。
如果覺得不錯(cuò),希望得到你們的贊賞。
因小小的贊賞,能給我大大的動(dòng)力。
感謝!
文goods_hk @東加豆
(tonkabean@ymail.com)
3 ) 越獄片的鼻祖嗎?
必須得加上1978年的標(biāo)簽才能比較公平地評(píng)價(jià)這個(gè)片,因?yàn)?quot;肖申克的救贖"已經(jīng)太珠玉在前了.
很喜歡這種暗暗但很有質(zhì)感的畫面,土耳其,伊斯坦布爾,充滿了古老神秘的元素,幾個(gè)城市掠影的鏡頭都很迷人.
不知道這片是不是越獄片的鼻祖,對(duì)于監(jiān)獄里種種暴行的如實(shí)描繪,不帶一點(diǎn)掩飾,還有法律的不夠公平,這種殘忍讓人懷疑懲罰的合理性.
雖然是不錯(cuò),還是難免看得走神,畢竟太多情節(jié)似曾相識(shí).不過得說演員演得不錯(cuò),從帶毒的不羈青年,初入監(jiān)獄少不更事,安心在監(jiān)獄蹲4年半,改判終生監(jiān)禁時(shí)的憤怒,徹底毀了以后的頹廢懦弱,還有女朋友探監(jiān)那一場(chǎng),唉......每個(gè)時(shí)段都有不一樣的表現(xiàn),很贊.
4 ) 戲劇化的真實(shí)故事
經(jīng)典的越獄片之一,即使在如今這個(gè)年代,無數(shù)參差不齊的越獄類型片奔涌而出,《午夜快車》也依舊是一部精彩的不可復(fù)制的好電影。
《午夜快車》的故事是由一個(gè)真實(shí)事件改編而來的。但在這里,這個(gè)故事要比原事件戲劇化很多,所表達(dá)出來的東西更為深刻豐富。都說藝術(shù)是源于生活卻又高于生活的。這個(gè)故事來自生活,但它被奧利弗 斯通用戲劇化的文字重新組裝了一遍,還是原來的骨架卻被換了一身皮囊。這就好比現(xiàn)在的整容,初衷都是為了將更好的自己展現(xiàn)在眾人眼前。幸運(yùn)的是它沒被整殘,所以成了經(jīng)典。
電影改編了劇情同時(shí)也改編了人物,這讓原本可能太過極端可怕的故事在看似極端的環(huán)境下變得合理且溫馨。電影就是有這個(gè)魔力讓一切可怕的變成溫馨甜蜜,反之亦然。在這個(gè)故事中所有的人物都是立體的。主人公Billy從一開始的膽怯緊張到后來為朋友殺人近乎瘋狂;Jim從一個(gè)文弱友愛的書生竟為朋友而起了殺心……類似這樣前后強(qiáng)烈的反差不僅僅體現(xiàn)出了人物的精神壓力和性格變化,更是有效的凸顯出了環(huán)境對(duì)于人的摧殘,以及在畸形不健全的法律政治的操控下整個(gè)社會(huì)的陰暗可怕。相較于說教或是直接表現(xiàn)黑暗的故事,這樣的情節(jié)安排更能打動(dòng)人心,引起關(guān)注。確實(shí),在這部影片播出后得到了美國(guó)政府的關(guān)注,解救了不少被土耳其莫名扣押下的“罪人”。
不說其他,只聊故事。從整體來看,這個(gè)故事是由一條主線發(fā)展的,開頭十分鐘主線故事的激勵(lì)事件出場(chǎng)--Billy在機(jī)場(chǎng)被抓(這是第一幕的一個(gè)小高潮)。在Billy被抓前影片的節(jié)奏就是一張一弛的,導(dǎo)演從一開始就把電影的整體節(jié)奏規(guī)劃好了。Billy在第一次被檢查時(shí)的緊張,可以從他臉頰上不知是汗水還是自來水的特寫感觸到,被順利放行后與女友在車上調(diào)情時(shí)的輕松有效的緩解了剛才的緊張,緊接著激勵(lì)事件的爆發(fā),成功的從一開始就奠定出了影片基調(diào),使得之后的劇情發(fā)展基本都是按照這個(gè)基調(diào)、節(jié)奏繼續(xù)。故事發(fā)展的張弛得當(dāng),讓沒有運(yùn)用什么電影技巧的片子依舊能夠扣人心弦,讓人從劇情上喜歡這個(gè)電影。這足以說明這個(gè)劇本確確實(shí)實(shí)是一個(gè)好劇本,奧利弗 斯通既是一位優(yōu)秀導(dǎo)演同時(shí)也是一位會(huì)講故事的好編劇。
5 ) What is a crime
Intense and mind-boggling. A seemingly deserving punishment from a stupid mistake turned out to be violating humanity. Humans weren't treated equally as humans sometimes. Sometimes they're benefits and sometimes they're cannon fodders, or just flickering head counts for the accountants. Why is it so simple for people to lose mercy yet so hard to retain justice and good ethics?
The monologue stuck in me is this:
What is a crime? What is a punishment? It seems to vary from time to time and from place to place. What's legal today is suddenly illegal tomorrow because some society says it's so and what's illegal yesterday is suddenly legal because everybody's doing it and you can't put everybody in jail. I'm not saying this is right or wrong. I'm just saying that's the way it is...And you, I just wish you could be standing where I'm standing right now and feel what that feels like because then you would know something that you don't know Mr. prosecutor. Mercy! You'd know that the concept of a society is based on the quality of that mercy, its sense of fair play, its sense of justice.
The movie passes a sense of magical reality with the downhill scene switching from the airport to the ghettos, and then to the prison, and finally to the psychiatric house. Nothing felt realistic yet everything happened for real. Both the acting and the shooting were blatant and bold to give that realistic and ridiculous feeling such as the brutal fighting between the protagonist Willliam Hayes and his fellow indiscreet prisoner Rifki, whose tongue was biten off by Hayes at the end of the fight, which was quite unexpected and cultish. Besides, you got to see a showcase of environmental homesexuality, the raw sexual desire and psychiatric decomposition from the prolonged detention. The overall atmosphere felt typical of the 1970s.
Lastly, another thing I agree with in the film:
Loneliness is a physical pain.
One last reminder, I watched this film because of Giorgio Moroder and Querelle
6 ) 《午夜快車》chase and go。
《午夜快車》有一個(gè)前期的段落,主角威廉海耶斯因?yàn)楹淠昧吮O(jiān)獄里的大私貨販子瑞福里的“貨物”被子用來蓋,結(jié)果被瑞福里聯(lián)合獄警狠狠的修理了一通,整個(gè)腳被警棍打爛。當(dāng)他從第二天醒來時(shí),他發(fā)現(xiàn)自個(gè)兒被放置在一個(gè)洗漱臺(tái)附近的房間。那個(gè)場(chǎng)景一開始的交代環(huán)境的主鏡頭讓人記憶猶新,帶著輕微的晃動(dòng),畫面從上往下?lián)u,昏暗的,帶著塵土質(zhì)感的光線零零散散地分布在空間里,監(jiān)獄里分不清是清真寺樣式還是東正教風(fēng)格的窗闌被照耀出救贖的感覺,然而緊接著便是主角疲憊的痛苦模樣。在那一刻,電影似乎才把自己的想說的理念展示出來——天地不仁。
誠(chéng)然,本片在中國(guó)的評(píng)價(jià)很一般。它屬于的那個(gè)時(shí)代,那個(gè)運(yùn)動(dòng)(新好萊塢),有太多魅力了,到現(xiàn)在仍然如同海市蜃樓一樣吸引著諸多的人。但,眾所周知,除去電影獨(dú)特的影像特性之外,花絮以及透露出的劇情理念,自始至終讓很多人對(duì)大部分的電影評(píng)價(jià)不純粹。新好萊塢尤其會(huì)被特殊對(duì)待,這些冷戰(zhàn)色彩濃厚以及反映美國(guó)本土政治事件的電影,在普世價(jià)值還沒那么泛濫之前,在高度娛樂化還沒成濫觴之前出現(xiàn),因?yàn)楠?dú)特的,或多或少黨同伐異的,激進(jìn)的表達(dá)而被現(xiàn)在大批習(xí)慣了“大片”的觀眾所嫌棄。如果與現(xiàn)在社會(huì)的普遍觀念不同更是會(huì)被扣上各種帽子。比如本片在各大中國(guó)平臺(tái),最主要的評(píng)價(jià)無非是“意識(shí)形態(tài)輸出毒草”,“洗白毒販的電影”。
除開影像本身,改編原著作者確實(shí)有投機(jī)的一面。但是電影是應(yīng)當(dāng)看自己內(nèi)容本身的,忽略內(nèi)容,甚至?xí)r代性和地域性去定性一部電影或多或少大可不必了。本片以一個(gè)美國(guó)人的角度,側(cè)面反映因?yàn)閲?guó)家之間的無來由沖突而生活憋屈甚至絕望的一整個(gè)過程與浮世繪,遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)超脫了簡(jiǎn)單的“文化輸出”,是導(dǎo)演悲憫的體現(xiàn);而對(duì)大環(huán)境的恰如其分的描寫,符合真實(shí)歷史的社會(huì)政治情緒,也正是讓同時(shí)代美國(guó)人認(rèn)可的主要原因。是腳踏實(shí)地的,服務(wù)本國(guó)人們的優(yōu)質(zhì)文藝作。
全片劇情掩藏著了不少思考,比如政治事件的意想不到影響,宗教對(duì)現(xiàn)代社會(huì)的無力而最一目了然的在于探討秩序的B敘事。雖說主角因?yàn)樨湺径慌行?,但“毒品”這個(gè)元素更像是一種時(shí)代的切分點(diǎn),由主角的父親點(diǎn)出“是年輕人的特質(zhì)”,而戲中圍繞著主角判刑的彈性討論才是重點(diǎn),律師與法庭的一整個(gè)系列戲份的產(chǎn)生直接向我們展示帶有人治色彩的法庭的可笑和明顯缺點(diǎn),律師通過人情,而不是法典來辯護(hù),法官和執(zhí)法者可以通過社會(huì)國(guó)家的立場(chǎng)改變隨時(shí)讓犯人獲得新的罪名,司法程序毫無理性可言。而監(jiān)獄中充斥著的私刑和陷害更是讓主題更加沉重。近乎辱罵。
當(dāng)然,本片的價(jià)值可不止豐富的主題;一直以來,所有文藝作品都很希望突出一種與現(xiàn)實(shí)相呼應(yīng)的“真實(shí)感”,簡(jiǎn)單來說就是讓觀眾相信故事里的所有要素的真實(shí)性。本片的創(chuàng)作者在各個(gè)層面上面,對(duì)于真實(shí)感的塑造都是教科書級(jí)別的精心。作為以“斗爭(zhēng)者”出名的電影人,奧利弗斯通很早就有了風(fēng)格化的戲劇文本的設(shè)計(jì),并在本片中達(dá)到了出色的呈現(xiàn)。片中人物的對(duì)話和單人場(chǎng)景,譬如重要人物癮君子的第一次出場(chǎng)的對(duì)話與后期愿想破滅后的法庭戲都被設(shè)計(jì)出一種類似于帕索里尼的臨場(chǎng)采訪感覺。這樣能快速的讓觀眾納入大量信息,點(diǎn)出小環(huán)境(監(jiān)獄)的人物生存狀態(tài),并細(xì)枝末節(jié)地勾勒大的歷史背景,高效率地完成敘事,讓觀眾以最快的時(shí)間貼著主角的視角判斷,感受角色的情緒。另一方面,除去傳統(tǒng)化的三幕大結(jié)構(gòu),大量紀(jì)實(shí)化的片段(與主角無多關(guān)系的片面事件)被穿插在各種劇情里,進(jìn)一步反應(yīng)整個(gè)敘述地點(diǎn)的特質(zhì)(譬如殘酷以及野蠻),與此同時(shí)提供諸多混亂豐富的符號(hào)供人解答,殺貓一場(chǎng)戲尤為震撼,直接了當(dāng)?shù)陌讶宋镌诃h(huán)境里的渺小給赤裸裸的公開,力度相當(dāng)強(qiáng)。
光有一個(gè)好的劇本是不足以的,艾倫帕克本人很獨(dú)到并且清晰的調(diào)度也是讓本片出采的原因。艾倫帕克在本片中雖然沒有體現(xiàn)出才氣很大的影像段落,但是“穩(wěn)當(dāng)”和“毫厘不爽”的按照特定理念和邏輯設(shè)計(jì)電影才是重點(diǎn)。
本片一共有兩種影像的主旨構(gòu)成,其中第一種便是“紀(jì)實(shí)性”,或者說基礎(chǔ)性的“紀(jì)實(shí)性”,這從一開始便被導(dǎo)演釋放在了開頭,通過連貫的聲音,一系列時(shí)長(zhǎng)短小,帶著記錄感的構(gòu)圖被連在一起,與主角收拾自己與毒品的場(chǎng)景“打擂臺(tái)”。從此,至少在影像流動(dòng)的角度,記錄感片段與劇情片段的區(qū)別以及相互照應(yīng)的流程便牢牢地按在了觀眾的眼睛里。全片的影像風(fēng)格非常統(tǒng)一,后面的審訊情節(jié),逃跑時(shí)的餐館場(chǎng)景以及監(jiān)獄和精神病院中都出現(xiàn)的同樣的分鏡設(shè)計(jì)方式,不同場(chǎng)景便得以在這樣的分鏡設(shè)計(jì)里塞入更多指向和符號(hào),更全面的認(rèn)識(shí)情境,以及給人比人物空間走動(dòng)更全面的臨場(chǎng)感覺。
第二個(gè)主旨便是音樂性。岔開本身先鋒味道十足的配樂看,很多情節(jié)被鏡頭搭配出一種音樂一樣的韻律感,如同歌舞片一樣層次鱗次櫛比。前面的逃亡戲中,我們很自然的看見鏡頭的剪輯反應(yīng)隨著主角自身的情緒變化,以及pov視角張弛有度的插入。而后面和監(jiān)獄私貨販子的打斗更是像歌劇一樣,主角憤怒后達(dá)到情緒頂點(diǎn),運(yùn)動(dòng)鏡頭抖動(dòng)加快并且快速切入各種反應(yīng),最后也像音樂結(jié)束一樣,剪輯放緩,人物運(yùn)動(dòng)變慢并呈現(xiàn)出悲愴的一面。最厲害的應(yīng)該是精神病院的散步戲,如同音樂的段落變化,主角從病房進(jìn)入一個(gè)構(gòu)圖上面如同一個(gè)昏暗的舞臺(tái)的空間,人物茫然的運(yùn)動(dòng),加上音效呈現(xiàn)出詭異的地獄質(zhì)感。這簡(jiǎn)直就是歌舞片主角個(gè)人唱段的外化場(chǎng)景的另一維度翻版,從情節(jié)角度上,給觀眾的巨大震撼力也是無以言表。
除開好處,本片的缺點(diǎn)也很明顯,甚至是,顯而易見。理念上面,奧利弗斯通想要表達(dá)的東西依然過多以至于超越了他的能力,很多批判性質(zhì)的想法沒能全部呈現(xiàn),最后轉(zhuǎn)為了靠類型化的結(jié)局以及激烈發(fā)展讓觀眾忽略思考的方式結(jié)束整部電影,確實(shí)是落入了下乘。而主角的表演的確實(shí)是稚嫩了很多,癮君子的表演堪稱極致,但監(jiān)獄中其他人物的表演就有點(diǎn)一般了。但是忽略這一切,《午夜快車》足夠優(yōu)秀,既然我們想到這部電影的魅力之處就在于畫面里的真實(shí),以及踏實(shí)的表達(dá),那就讓我們用安靜平靜的情緒觀看這部電影,體驗(yàn)?zāi)欠N悲憫的描寫就行了。
根據(jù)比利海耶斯的同名自傳改編,「午夜快車」是獄友對(duì)越獄的代稱。斯通憑借這個(gè)戲拿了奧斯卡最佳改編劇本,但選材的話題性肯定要壓過劇本本身的水平:主角在「毫無民主人權(quán)」的土耳其因?yàn)樽咚酱舐檫@樣的「小罪名」先受了三年牢獄之災(zāi),即將出獄之時(shí)又成為了美土外交危機(jī)的犧牲品,被改判了終身監(jiān)禁。精神世界逐步崩塌的他先殺監(jiān)獄惡霸后殺政府惡警后,終于逃出生天。故事聽起來當(dāng)然有足夠的傳奇性,也符合好萊塢主流審美的品味(畢竟幾十年后他們還在拍《逃離德黑蘭》),但總體充斥大量對(duì)土耳其人的刻板描寫和生硬直給的痛苦展現(xiàn),像主角最終穿著警服走出監(jiān)獄時(shí)先慢慢踱步再開始飛奔最后定格在跳躍上之類的小設(shè)計(jì)還是太少了。技術(shù)部門里發(fā)揮得最好的是配樂,兼具異域風(fēng)情與哀傷的基調(diào)。男主角眉目之間挺像年輕的卡拉格,約翰赫特演的馬克斯我沒認(rèn)出來。
預(yù)期很高,于是落差很大,比較失望,很難投入,開頭還好,后面監(jiān)獄生活就開始迷失重點(diǎn)了,觀眾不需要像主角一樣感到煎熬,尤其是無法產(chǎn)生情緒反應(yīng)只能冷眼旁觀的煎熬。//女友探監(jiān)的段落很棒,把性壓抑的煎熬拍出來了。
OliverStone編劇,土耳其監(jiān)獄里的美國(guó)人,尼克松外交、美土關(guān)系短暫緊張的犧牲品。土耳其人被刻畫得面目可憎。4年刑期一朝變成30年,挖眼咬舌打斗戲、女友探監(jiān)手淫戲,BradDavis歇斯底里的表演都讓人印象深刻。結(jié)尾逃出生天過程戲劇化,連續(xù)的定格畫面、凄清的主題音樂升華了情緒。那段同性鏡頭頗詭異
不知道是不是我想太多了,我覺得這片子的觀點(diǎn)太片面了,既沒有展現(xiàn)美國(guó)國(guó)內(nèi)的情況,也沒有給土耳其人說話的機(jī)會(huì),這不是妖魔化土耳其人么,而且男主確實(shí)走私毒品了沒錯(cuò),還不許別人依法辦他啦…
重看。還是加一星。剪輯的意味全在靠碎片化的,剪映化的極佳攝影空境拼在一起,滿足導(dǎo)演和觀眾同樣的對(duì)異域的好奇。而剩下的對(duì)話與交流,乃至人物的行動(dòng)則突出一種刻意的超現(xiàn)實(shí),粗糙的真實(shí)場(chǎng)景搭配頗具設(shè)計(jì)感的運(yùn)鏡和視角選擇甚至有種詩(shī)意(類似于頂級(jí)的林嶺東?)導(dǎo)演極其會(huì)表現(xiàn)痛苦,好幾場(chǎng)寫實(shí)凌厲的動(dòng)作戲讓人無法自拔,堪稱暴力美學(xué)典范??傮w而言算是新好萊塢中上水準(zhǔn)作品。可惜的地方就在于導(dǎo)演的右翼傾向以及作為中國(guó)人對(duì)FD案件的敏感了(我倒是還討厭本片表達(dá)出的對(duì)第三世界國(guó)家的不尊重)偶對(duì)了,配樂極佳。
“一部壞的機(jī)器,不知道自己是部壞的機(jī)器?!?/p>
坦白地說,從電影本身來說,影片是過譽(yù)的。當(dāng)然從政治意義上來說,對(duì)土耳其監(jiān)獄黑暗面的揭露和譴責(zé)是達(dá)到的。更愿意把片子看做是搬演的紀(jì)錄片而不是商業(yè)片。斯通的劇本,只有一處,就是比利對(duì)著探監(jiān)的女友,讓她脫去衣服手淫,讓人記憶深刻,非常地驚心,不知道是真事還是虛構(gòu)?;ㄐ踔械恼嫒寺睹妫v述往事其實(shí)比影片更好看。我很想知道當(dāng)時(shí)尼克松到底是什么事得罪了土耳其政府。
七〇年一二逼美國(guó)仔因攜帶大麻關(guān)進(jìn)土耳其監(jiān)獄,三年將滿時(shí)美土交惡,判了無期。期間越獄不成,挨打受餓,最后一次被牢頭單打時(shí)牢頭摔死,遂換裝逃出。有點(diǎn)小文藝,因?yàn)楣P觸太細(xì)膩。故事本無奇,在政治對(duì)壘上傾述過多。跟《生不承情》一樣,雖然能連貫看進(jìn)去,但頗覺沒他們說的那么好,四星夠了。
不可避免地有美式愛管閑事的政治立場(chǎng)和抹黑伊斯蘭國(guó)家的嫌疑,但是真正意義拍出了監(jiān)獄對(duì)人精神層面上的摧殘,比一般越獄片更深刻。
the bad machine doesn't know he is a bad machine.土耳其、毒品、越獄
看得好累啊這個(gè)真的不大適合我看。。(【電影男孩】04. 午夜快車)
1.同性情節(jié)突兀而莫名其妙;2.吊死貓的情節(jié)看不下去,不喜歡用這種手法制造角色矛盾;3.美國(guó)還真是堅(jiān)持不懈抹黑他國(guó)啊。
多么癡情的姑娘 過了好幾年了還去探監(jiān) 激起了他的求生欲望 姑娘你這么深情 怎么過了好幾年才去看你的心上人呢 至于美國(guó)的政治立場(chǎng)及對(duì)土耳其的丑化 見仁見智吧
斯通的編劇也就這回事,前面拖沓的要死,后面的越獄又顯得太倉(cāng)促,沒法讓人信服。約翰·亨特的這個(gè)角色擺明了是要向《巴比龍》中的達(dá)斯汀霍夫曼看齊~
http://www.2020-movie-reviews.com/reviews-year/1978-movie-reviews/midnight-express-1978-movie-review/
還很清楚地記得自己第一次看這部電影,是在九十年代初的一個(gè)情人節(jié)的晚上,當(dāng)時(shí)是出差去廣州,一個(gè)人在酒店里。幸好有這部電影,讓這個(gè)晚上不至于太無聊和寂寞?,F(xiàn)在終于淘到這張碟,又重新看了一遍,感覺雖然沒有第一次看那么精彩,但是年輕時(shí)的記憶猶存。
最終還是趕上了午夜快車了,最后定格照片很專業(yè)。ps.片中種族歧視很嚴(yán)重
我對(duì)這片的政治傾向沒有看法,垃圾在于手法,導(dǎo)演絕不能上來就灌輸,你面對(duì)的是有腦漿的成年觀眾,怎么能像對(duì)腸病患者一樣灌腸呢?誰(shuí)他媽的欠你錢了還是怎么地?年輕斯通的劇本跟攝影師Seresin還是不錯(cuò)的,尤其Seresin既能根據(jù)傻逼帕克的要求拍些直露到死的幼稚鏡頭,也能干出很玄乎的活
是極其不一樣的監(jiān)獄/越獄題材電影。十分震撼??疾煅輪T本身的生命便知道這樣一部電影和演員的關(guān)系是神來安排的。另一個(gè)Anthony Perkins。音樂雖然古老,但短暫的高潮和結(jié)尾被其提升到了極致。
盡管在評(píng)論與商業(yè)上都取得了成功,電影中對(duì)于土耳其人的塑造卻充滿了爭(zhēng)議:http://www.tallarmeniantale.com/MidExp-academic.htm。著墨不多的同性情節(jié)拍得頗為夢(mèng)幻,彷如黑暗中的一點(diǎn)微光。