萬(wàn)?，旣悂?span id="urkmrda" class="score text-red">
主演：卡塔琳娜·桑地諾·莫雷諾 Virgina Ariza Yenny Paola Vega
導(dǎo)演：喬舒亞·馬斯頓
猜你喜歡
劇照
更新時(shí)間：2024-10-09 12:01
詳細(xì)劇情
18歲的少女瑪利亞（凱特琳娜?桑迪諾?莫雷諾 Catalina Sandino Moreno 飾）辭掉了花場(chǎng)的工作，又發(fā)現(xiàn)自己懷孕，跟男友意見(jiàn)不合只得分手?，斃麃喓团笥巡继m卡得到了一份新工作——走私毒品到美國(guó)，瑪利亞在高額的酬金下決定接下此活，由此認(rèn)識(shí)了老手露西，并練習(xí)吞食毒品，朋友布蘭卡得知后也執(zhí)意要做。在機(jī)場(chǎng)，瑪利亞被扣下檢查，因?yàn)樯碓胁诺靡悦撋?。三人被接走后順利交貨，?dāng)晚，瑪利亞發(fā)現(xiàn)露西因藥丸在胃里破裂被毒販殺害，當(dāng)即將和布蘭卡帶走了毒品。為了幫助露西，瑪利亞根據(jù)她留下的信息找到了她姐姐卡拉家。一次兩人不小心在中介費(fèi)爾南多眼里泄露了身份，她們只好向毒販交出了毒品，拿錢(qián)之后布蘭卡踏上了回程，而在檢票口，瑪利亞卻轉(zhuǎn)身走了......
長(zhǎng)篇影評(píng)
1 ) 善惡之花
《萬(wàn)?，旣悂啞芬云淅潇o克制的風(fēng)格呈現(xiàn)、內(nèi)核卻是世界性苦難的問(wèn)題、與金基德殘酷外部世界《撒瑪利亞的女孩》相比較、影片中的美麗女主角表現(xiàn)出來(lái)的沉穩(wěn)、獨(dú)立、隱忍、富有同情心等美好品格隱喻著宗教類(lèi)型的化身，但現(xiàn)實(shí)中用身體去販毒攜帶出境，用青春的生命去鋌而走險(xiǎn)，內(nèi)心萌芽實(shí)施的這種惡的走向，人性總是充滿(mǎn)著矛盾，電影也真切地表達(dá)了這種雙重性。 第三世界國(guó)家向往的＂美國(guó)夢(mèng)＂，往往就是一場(chǎng)豪賭，生命的賭注新聞報(bào)道中整船、整車(chē)廂、偷渡窒息死亡的案例世界為之震驚，但還是有人不斷地叩響達(dá)闖這道鬼門(mén)關(guān)，《萬(wàn)?，旣悂啞分幸彩怯眠@樣的主題揭露這種丑惡的交易，影片沒(méi)有用太多殘酷的畫(huà)面來(lái)表達(dá)，而是通過(guò)瑪麗亞的經(jīng)歷和內(nèi)心變化來(lái)影射。 導(dǎo)演喬舒亞.馬斯頓以拍攝美劇作品而著稱(chēng)：《新聞編輯室》、《捫心問(wèn)診》第一季、《柏林情報(bào)站》第一季、《傲骨賢妻》第五季、《六尺之下》第五季等都讓人津津樂(lè)道，電影《骨肉之軀》、《萬(wàn)福瑪麗亞》也是他的代表作品。
片名如果直譯的話(huà)叫做＂恩典滿(mǎn)溢的瑪麗亞＂，譯為《萬(wàn)?，旣悂啞泛苜N切了一點(diǎn)也沒(méi)問(wèn)題，宗教完美化身的瑪麗亞與影片中瑪麗亞的運(yùn)氣與善良有著點(diǎn)滴相伴，罪孽中的悔意和懷孕檢查中對(duì)新生命的希望喜悅，在返回故鄉(xiāng)機(jī)場(chǎng)的入口處毅然地回頭留下來(lái)，《萬(wàn)?，旣悂啞穼?dǎo)演應(yīng)該也是在祝福劇中人物和現(xiàn)實(shí)世界類(lèi)似的人物，隱隱感動(dòng)的同情心，飾演瑪麗亞的卡塔琳娜.莫雷諾演技自然有深度、同樣也楚楚動(dòng)人。
2 ) A Choice
This is the harrowing story of a (not quite) typical mule: Maria Alvarez (Moreno), an intelligent and fiercely independent 17-year-old girl from Colombia who agrees to smuggle a half-kilo of heroin into the United States.
Walking out of the theatre, I found myself at a loss of words.
What struck me the most about the story was how un-exaggerate everything was. Let it be Maria’s job, her village, or her family. They were portrayed with moderation and care. The result was impressively real and honest. Maria’s job was not uncommon for a third world country’s village girl of 17. I’ve read far worse treatment and horror stories of factory workers in ShenZheng, China. The real evil was in the lack of a choice. All Maria had was the job in the flower factory. It was the only economic opportunity presented to Maria. It was what her family, even her entire village depended on. Sounds familiar? I thought of that British mining town in Billy Elliot.
Like all country girls who rebelled against their fate, Maria made a choice, the same choice all country girls in her shoes made, to go to the city. On her way, she was tempted away from the possibility of becoming a rich family’s maid; instead, she was offered an adventure. Traveling, America, and American dollars added together proven to be too big a temptation to turn down for a rebellious country girl. Was there really a huge difference for her, between pulling thorns off roses and swallowing cocaine pellets and carried them to America? Both were rich people’s merchandises, both were beyond her reach. She was one little link in the economy chain. The latter sounded a lot more exciting than the former, and it would take her beyond the depressing village outside of Bogota. She was, finally, presented a choice.
The subsequent story made me admire Maria’s intelligence and coolness. But it also chilled me to the bone to see how cruel and brutal the drug world was (is).
Would legalizing drugs clean up all these brutality? Would legalizing drugs prevent Maria and her fellow Columbian women from participating in this dark and ugly trade?
If so, then why wouldn’t any country take that step?
“Because drugs are evil and hurt people who use them. How could you legalize something so damaging to our very selves? How could any government give out any signal that drug abuse is ‘legal’, therefore, ‘ok’?”
Because not legalizing it made it worse? Because the huge profit margin is driving the drug trade into a frenzy, and it is killing poor people like Maria left and right? Cigarette is legal, isn’t it? It is harmful to people’s health, too. Why is that okay to endorse but not drugs? Since when human being became such innocent creatures?
“If you legalize drugs, then more people will become drug addicts. That would be disastrous and self-destructive.”
Okay. People have self-destructive tendencies. There are evils in these world, too many. People always have the choice of whether to become drug addicts, just like people have the choice of whether to smoke a cigarette. Are you saying that government has the right to make the choice for its citizens that the government knows what is best? What about education? What about the fittest survive? It is not like I don’t get drug offered when I walk down Telegraph Ave. in Berkeley, it is not like high school kids don’t get drug offers in parties, at playground, on their way to school, anyways. It is happening right now. How much worse could it get? Besides, once it became legal, it could take away the “adventurous lure” it has right now to the rebellious type. Couldn’t it?
Drug abuse is part of modern societies already. We have to deal with it. But if legalizing it could take away the huge profit for the drug lord, then it could reduce their incentive to produce them. It could dry up so many money sources for terrorist groups and anti-government organizations. It could save Maria and girls like her the fate of dying on ruptured cocaine pellets that they carry in their stomach. It could save them from being treated like animals (”mule”), whose stomach was cut open so their cargo could be retrieved. Mule’s life was of no consequence. The dehumanization of Maria and her fellow mules was not caused by drug’s own evil-ness directly. It was made possible by the huge profit of drug trade, and its huge profit came from their illegal status. It was made possible because of human being’s own greed.
If government wants to do good to the society, then it could place the choice into everyone’s own hand. Take away the possibility to make people even more greedy than they already are. Don’t tempt them. Trust them.
In Chinese modern history, there was a much revered national hero, General Lin Zexu. Who initiate the fight against the British in 1840’s. He burned all the opium he could gather in a huge public display. His angry words are still recited in today’s Chinese elementary school classrooms, “Opium is evil, it weakened our people, our soldier, our country…” But the fact was, Chinese society was weakened from inside before opium even appeared. The closed society has been quietly rotten away from top to bottom for centuries. There was little outlet for real talent of the society. There wasn’t much progress happeneing for the society as a whole. Corruptions were prevalent. Opium provided an escape. A dying plant happened upon a killer disease. It was easy to blame the disease. Even though General Lin Zexu won his opium war, the final treaty between the British and the Qin Dynasty turned out to be the first of many humiliating treaties to come in China’s Modern History. Burning Opium didn’t help General Lin’s cause. Burning the entire country might. That was exactly what Chairman Mao tried over a century later.
There is a little analogy in gardening. When a flower attracted diseases, it was often because the plant itself was weak and unhealthy, either from lack of water, light, or too much water, etcetera. To prevent disease from happening, you either make the plant strong and healthy, or you try to shut down all disease sources. The latter has proven to be a harder path. Shutting down flow of air would usually cause more problems to the plant. Exposing the plant to the natural elements was usually more healthy for the plant. As long as the plant was healthy, often it could fight off many diseases using its own strength.
Walking out of the theatre, I found myself at a loss of words.
What struck me the most about the story was how un-exaggerate everything was. Let it be Maria’s job, her village, or her family. They were portrayed with moderation and care. The result was impressively real and honest. Maria’s job was not uncommon for a third world country’s village girl of 17. I’ve read far worse treatment and horror stories of factory workers in ShenZheng, China. The real evil was in the lack of a choice. All Maria had was the job in the flower factory. It was the only economic opportunity presented to Maria. It was what her family, even her entire village depended on. Sounds familiar? I thought of that British mining town in Billy Elliot.
Like all country girls who rebelled against their fate, Maria made a choice, the same choice all country girls in her shoes made, to go to the city. On her way, she was tempted away from the possibility of becoming a rich family’s maid; instead, she was offered an adventure. Traveling, America, and American dollars added together proven to be too big a temptation to turn down for a rebellious country girl. Was there really a huge difference for her, between pulling thorns off roses and swallowing cocaine pellets and carried them to America? Both were rich people’s merchandises, both were beyond her reach. She was one little link in the economy chain. The latter sounded a lot more exciting than the former, and it would take her beyond the depressing village outside of Bogota. She was, finally, presented a choice.
The subsequent story made me admire Maria’s intelligence and coolness. But it also chilled me to the bone to see how cruel and brutal the drug world was (is).
Would legalizing drugs clean up all these brutality? Would legalizing drugs prevent Maria and her fellow Columbian women from participating in this dark and ugly trade?
If so, then why wouldn’t any country take that step?
“Because drugs are evil and hurt people who use them. How could you legalize something so damaging to our very selves? How could any government give out any signal that drug abuse is ‘legal’, therefore, ‘ok’?”
Because not legalizing it made it worse? Because the huge profit margin is driving the drug trade into a frenzy, and it is killing poor people like Maria left and right? Cigarette is legal, isn’t it? It is harmful to people’s health, too. Why is that okay to endorse but not drugs? Since when human being became such innocent creatures?
“If you legalize drugs, then more people will become drug addicts. That would be disastrous and self-destructive.”
Okay. People have self-destructive tendencies. There are evils in these world, too many. People always have the choice of whether to become drug addicts, just like people have the choice of whether to smoke a cigarette. Are you saying that government has the right to make the choice for its citizens that the government knows what is best? What about education? What about the fittest survive? It is not like I don’t get drug offered when I walk down Telegraph Ave. in Berkeley, it is not like high school kids don’t get drug offers in parties, at playground, on their way to school, anyways. It is happening right now. How much worse could it get? Besides, once it became legal, it could take away the “adventurous lure” it has right now to the rebellious type. Couldn’t it?
Drug abuse is part of modern societies already. We have to deal with it. But if legalizing it could take away the huge profit for the drug lord, then it could reduce their incentive to produce them. It could dry up so many money sources for terrorist groups and anti-government organizations. It could save Maria and girls like her the fate of dying on ruptured cocaine pellets that they carry in their stomach. It could save them from being treated like animals (”mule”), whose stomach was cut open so their cargo could be retrieved. Mule’s life was of no consequence. The dehumanization of Maria and her fellow mules was not caused by drug’s own evil-ness directly. It was made possible by the huge profit of drug trade, and its huge profit came from their illegal status. It was made possible because of human being’s own greed.
If government wants to do good to the society, then it could place the choice into everyone’s own hand. Take away the possibility to make people even more greedy than they already are. Don’t tempt them. Trust them.
In Chinese modern history, there was a much revered national hero, General Lin Zexu. Who initiate the fight against the British in 1840’s. He burned all the opium he could gather in a huge public display. His angry words are still recited in today’s Chinese elementary school classrooms, “Opium is evil, it weakened our people, our soldier, our country…” But the fact was, Chinese society was weakened from inside before opium even appeared. The closed society has been quietly rotten away from top to bottom for centuries. There was little outlet for real talent of the society. There wasn’t much progress happeneing for the society as a whole. Corruptions were prevalent. Opium provided an escape. A dying plant happened upon a killer disease. It was easy to blame the disease. Even though General Lin Zexu won his opium war, the final treaty between the British and the Qin Dynasty turned out to be the first of many humiliating treaties to come in China’s Modern History. Burning Opium didn’t help General Lin’s cause. Burning the entire country might. That was exactly what Chairman Mao tried over a century later.
There is a little analogy in gardening. When a flower attracted diseases, it was often because the plant itself was weak and unhealthy, either from lack of water, light, or too much water, etcetera. To prevent disease from happening, you either make the plant strong and healthy, or you try to shut down all disease sources. The latter has proven to be a harder path. Shutting down flow of air would usually cause more problems to the plant. Exposing the plant to the natural elements was usually more healthy for the plant. As long as the plant was healthy, often it could fight off many diseases using its own strength.
3 ) 這個(gè)世界如此美好，值得人們?yōu)樗鼕^斗。我只同意后半句。
講述的是一個(gè)哥倫比亞女孩瑪利亞用身體販毒（吞下一包包的毒品）的故事。影片的宣傳語(yǔ)是Based on 1000 true stroies.
成千上萬(wàn)象Maria一樣的女孩冒著死亡的危險(xiǎn)走踏上了飛往美利堅(jiān)的航班，只是為了改變自己的命運(yùn)，等待她們的是什么？他們不知道。影片中Maria是一個(gè)當(dāng)出生在哥倫比亞小村莊的17歲女孩，不甘于簡(jiǎn)單重復(fù)的工作和糟糕的環(huán)境，一次偶然的機(jī)會(huì)讓她結(jié)識(shí)了毒販子富蘭克林，她的生活即將發(fā)生改變。影片中Maria問(wèn)已經(jīng)“去過(guò)”兩次紐約的Lucy， 美國(guó)怎么樣？Lucy無(wú)不向往的說(shuō)那里很美很整潔……，或許就是這樣一句話(huà)促使Maria下定了決心，踏上了這條生死未卜的道路。
Maria身懷六甲，“帶著”62袋海洛因來(lái)到美國(guó)，經(jīng)歷種種磨難，終于換回了那本該屬于她的錢(qián)，當(dāng)她準(zhǔn)備踏上回家之路的時(shí)候，又是Lucy姐姐卡拉的一番話(huà)，最終讓Maria決定不在回去，因?yàn)榭ɡ嬖V她，這里總是充滿(mǎn)著希望總是有那樣這樣的機(jī)會(huì)，為了孩子當(dāng)初的她決定留下，不管多難。或許這就是影片想要讓觀眾思考的“題目”，是什么吸引了成千上萬(wàn)和Maria一樣的女孩走上這樣的“旅途”，又是什么讓她們留下。
想起了Seven（七宗罪）里，老干探的獨(dú)白：“海明威說(shuō)：這個(gè)世界如此美好，值得人們?yōu)樗鼕^斗。我只同意后半句。” （Earnest Hemingway once wrote, "The world is a fine place and worth fighting for." I believe the second part. ）
成千上萬(wàn)象Maria一樣的女孩冒著死亡的危險(xiǎn)走踏上了飛往美利堅(jiān)的航班，只是為了改變自己的命運(yùn)，等待她們的是什么？他們不知道。影片中Maria是一個(gè)當(dāng)出生在哥倫比亞小村莊的17歲女孩，不甘于簡(jiǎn)單重復(fù)的工作和糟糕的環(huán)境，一次偶然的機(jī)會(huì)讓她結(jié)識(shí)了毒販子富蘭克林，她的生活即將發(fā)生改變。影片中Maria問(wèn)已經(jīng)“去過(guò)”兩次紐約的Lucy， 美國(guó)怎么樣？Lucy無(wú)不向往的說(shuō)那里很美很整潔……，或許就是這樣一句話(huà)促使Maria下定了決心，踏上了這條生死未卜的道路。
Maria身懷六甲，“帶著”62袋海洛因來(lái)到美國(guó)，經(jīng)歷種種磨難，終于換回了那本該屬于她的錢(qián)，當(dāng)她準(zhǔn)備踏上回家之路的時(shí)候，又是Lucy姐姐卡拉的一番話(huà)，最終讓Maria決定不在回去，因?yàn)榭ɡ嬖V她，這里總是充滿(mǎn)著希望總是有那樣這樣的機(jī)會(huì)，為了孩子當(dāng)初的她決定留下，不管多難。或許這就是影片想要讓觀眾思考的“題目”，是什么吸引了成千上萬(wàn)和Maria一樣的女孩走上這樣的“旅途”，又是什么讓她們留下。
想起了Seven（七宗罪）里，老干探的獨(dú)白：“海明威說(shuō)：這個(gè)世界如此美好，值得人們?yōu)樗鼕^斗。我只同意后半句。” （Earnest Hemingway once wrote, "The world is a fine place and worth fighting for." I believe the second part. ）
4 ) 《萬(wàn)?，旣悂啞罚喝f(wàn)福，瑪麗亞，你充滿(mǎn)恩寵
人生陷入困境是常事，在《萬(wàn)?，旣悂啞分校覀兛床灰?jiàn)哥倫比亞濃郁的民族風(fēng)情，聽(tīng)不見(jiàn)那大海溫柔的嘆息，唯一得知 便是生活在那種窮困環(huán)境中的人們?！度f(wàn)福瑪麗亞》是導(dǎo)演喬舒華·瑪斯頓的電影處女作，有過(guò)拍攝連續(xù)劇《法律與秩序》的經(jīng)驗(yàn)，《萬(wàn)?，旣悂啞愤@樣的電影也自然是駕輕就熟。平實(shí)流暢的敘事，客觀冷靜的記錄，將每一位觀眾都引入一個(gè)罪惡的魔窟之中。當(dāng)一個(gè)十七歲的小女孩懷著身孕決定運(yùn)送毒品補(bǔ)貼家用的時(shí)候，那種感覺(jué)就好像是上帝死了。
生活大概遠(yuǎn)比電影要?dú)埧帷?br>
每次看欣賞第三世界國(guó)家電影的時(shí)候總要做一番掙扎，在這些國(guó)家中，有很多你想象不到的真實(shí)故事在上演，大多數(shù)故事都是關(guān)于絕望和死亡的。導(dǎo)演在《萬(wàn)福瑪麗亞》這部電影中，并沒(méi)有刻意去強(qiáng)調(diào)環(huán)境的艱苦，而是通過(guò)人物的生活，以及他們的對(duì)話(huà)和行為來(lái)展現(xiàn)哥倫比亞底層百姓的情困潦倒。在電影中，瑪麗亞一方面受到殘忍毒梟的欺壓，另一方面受到美國(guó)海關(guān)警察的冷庫(kù)對(duì)待，對(duì)于十七歲的女孩來(lái)說(shuō)，這樣的世界，除了殘酷，沒(méi)有更多的形容。女主角瑪麗亞的視角和經(jīng)歷是整部電影的主線(xiàn)，觀眾只能跟隨著瑪麗亞來(lái)了解那個(gè)殘酷的世界。從敘述手法上看，喬舒華·瑪斯頓并沒(méi)有可以的炫耀自己的拍攝技巧，反而用一種最真實(shí)簡(jiǎn)單的方式來(lái)講述這個(gè)故事，平鋪直敘，運(yùn)用劇情本身的張力來(lái)推動(dòng)電影的繼續(xù)，用演員的真實(shí)情感來(lái)充實(shí)整部電影。值得一提的是，這部電影最大的特色就是配樂(lè)。以往，人們?cè)诳措娪暗臅r(shí)候，配樂(lè)會(huì)成為烘托情緒的一種手段，而在本片中，所有的情緒和張力依靠的都是電影本身的劇情。
十七歲少女的人生掙扎是絕望和悲傷。
在任何一個(gè)國(guó)家，窮苦的人們想要出人頭地，唯一能依靠的就是自己。十七歲的瑪麗亞不僅要撐起家庭的經(jīng)濟(jì)負(fù)擔(dān)，還要盡量幫助姐姐來(lái)養(yǎng)活她的孩子。面對(duì)這樣的困境，瑪麗亞投射出來(lái)的是一種不符合年齡的堅(jiān)韌。雖然導(dǎo)演一直將鏡頭放在瑪麗亞身上，但是，縱觀全篇，導(dǎo)演依然將哥倫比亞這個(gè)國(guó)家中的人民，為了生存而需要擔(dān)負(fù)的代價(jià)表現(xiàn)的淋漓盡致。在遙遠(yuǎn)的第三世界國(guó)家，瑪麗亞這樣的任務(wù)比比皆是，年輕氣盛的性格和低三下四的工作處境相互沖擊著。他們拼盡全力想要得到自己渴望的成功。導(dǎo)演在本片中并沒(méi)有過(guò)分夸大哥倫比亞的經(jīng)濟(jì)問(wèn)題和民生問(wèn)題，而是用寫(xiě)實(shí)的手法，旁敲側(cè)擊的讓觀眾了解到哥倫比亞的絕望和悲傷。
整部電影除了瑪麗亞的選擇和堅(jiān)持之外，更重要的問(wèn)題則是所謂的美國(guó)夢(mèng)。在美國(guó)式資本主義商業(yè)機(jī)器的壓榨中，他們都認(rèn)為美國(guó)便是掘金圣地。當(dāng)他們冒著危險(xiǎn)來(lái)到美國(guó)的時(shí)候，得到的是冷漠的海關(guān)，懷疑的態(tài)度。哥倫比亞的毒梟將她們作為運(yùn)送毒品的工具，而美國(guó)司法機(jī)構(gòu)卻將她們視為危險(xiǎn)的所在，到最后，她們擁有的只是被人宰割和永無(wú)止盡的折磨。
生活大概遠(yuǎn)比電影要?dú)埧帷?br>
每次看欣賞第三世界國(guó)家電影的時(shí)候總要做一番掙扎，在這些國(guó)家中，有很多你想象不到的真實(shí)故事在上演，大多數(shù)故事都是關(guān)于絕望和死亡的。導(dǎo)演在《萬(wàn)福瑪麗亞》這部電影中，并沒(méi)有刻意去強(qiáng)調(diào)環(huán)境的艱苦，而是通過(guò)人物的生活，以及他們的對(duì)話(huà)和行為來(lái)展現(xiàn)哥倫比亞底層百姓的情困潦倒。在電影中，瑪麗亞一方面受到殘忍毒梟的欺壓，另一方面受到美國(guó)海關(guān)警察的冷庫(kù)對(duì)待，對(duì)于十七歲的女孩來(lái)說(shuō)，這樣的世界，除了殘酷，沒(méi)有更多的形容。女主角瑪麗亞的視角和經(jīng)歷是整部電影的主線(xiàn)，觀眾只能跟隨著瑪麗亞來(lái)了解那個(gè)殘酷的世界。從敘述手法上看，喬舒華·瑪斯頓并沒(méi)有可以的炫耀自己的拍攝技巧，反而用一種最真實(shí)簡(jiǎn)單的方式來(lái)講述這個(gè)故事，平鋪直敘，運(yùn)用劇情本身的張力來(lái)推動(dòng)電影的繼續(xù)，用演員的真實(shí)情感來(lái)充實(shí)整部電影。值得一提的是，這部電影最大的特色就是配樂(lè)。以往，人們?cè)诳措娪暗臅r(shí)候，配樂(lè)會(huì)成為烘托情緒的一種手段，而在本片中，所有的情緒和張力依靠的都是電影本身的劇情。
十七歲少女的人生掙扎是絕望和悲傷。
在任何一個(gè)國(guó)家，窮苦的人們想要出人頭地，唯一能依靠的就是自己。十七歲的瑪麗亞不僅要撐起家庭的經(jīng)濟(jì)負(fù)擔(dān)，還要盡量幫助姐姐來(lái)養(yǎng)活她的孩子。面對(duì)這樣的困境，瑪麗亞投射出來(lái)的是一種不符合年齡的堅(jiān)韌。雖然導(dǎo)演一直將鏡頭放在瑪麗亞身上，但是，縱觀全篇，導(dǎo)演依然將哥倫比亞這個(gè)國(guó)家中的人民，為了生存而需要擔(dān)負(fù)的代價(jià)表現(xiàn)的淋漓盡致。在遙遠(yuǎn)的第三世界國(guó)家，瑪麗亞這樣的任務(wù)比比皆是，年輕氣盛的性格和低三下四的工作處境相互沖擊著。他們拼盡全力想要得到自己渴望的成功。導(dǎo)演在本片中并沒(méi)有過(guò)分夸大哥倫比亞的經(jīng)濟(jì)問(wèn)題和民生問(wèn)題，而是用寫(xiě)實(shí)的手法，旁敲側(cè)擊的讓觀眾了解到哥倫比亞的絕望和悲傷。
整部電影除了瑪麗亞的選擇和堅(jiān)持之外，更重要的問(wèn)題則是所謂的美國(guó)夢(mèng)。在美國(guó)式資本主義商業(yè)機(jī)器的壓榨中，他們都認(rèn)為美國(guó)便是掘金圣地。當(dāng)他們冒著危險(xiǎn)來(lái)到美國(guó)的時(shí)候，得到的是冷漠的海關(guān)，懷疑的態(tài)度。哥倫比亞的毒梟將她們作為運(yùn)送毒品的工具，而美國(guó)司法機(jī)構(gòu)卻將她們視為危險(xiǎn)的所在，到最后，她們擁有的只是被人宰割和永無(wú)止盡的折磨。
5 ) 萬(wàn)?，旣悂?/h4>影片的最后，瑪麗亞轉(zhuǎn)身走向贖罪的道路，眼神堅(jiān)定，表情平靜，美麗的鎖骨上方是神圣的十字架掛墜
我相信，的瑪麗亞已經(jīng)找到了內(nèi)心真正的倚靠和歸屬，在輾轉(zhuǎn)于墮落的深淵之后，她心中的神，會(huì)眷顧這個(gè)有著堅(jiān)毅品格的善良少女。
片名叫萬(wàn)?，旣悂?，如同女主角的名字瑪麗亞，在影片中，宗教雖然沒(méi)有被公開(kāi)地談及，但是卻總是由始至終地貫穿在整部影片的背景中。就像我們的人生一樣，神明不是總是需要被時(shí)時(shí)提及和想起，但是在你需要幫助，在你感受到召喚的時(shí)候，它就會(huì)出現(xiàn)，在你身邊，給你力量。
6 ) 薄命佳人
最近看過(guò)三部電影，表面上非常不同，卻又不得不讓人聯(lián)系到一處?！度f(wàn)福瑪麗亞》（Maria, Full of Grace）說(shuō)的是哥倫比亞少女鋌而走險(xiǎn)，偷運(yùn)毒品到美國(guó)的故事。 偷運(yùn)的方法是將毒品包裹起來(lái)，吞下去，倘若不小心，毒品破裂，立即就會(huì)死人。整個(gè)過(guò)程幾死幾生，不過(guò)還好，最后有驚無(wú)險(xiǎn)，馬里亞留到了紐約，面向一個(gè)完全未知的未來(lái)，因?yàn)榛仡^無(wú)岸，有的只是無(wú)邊的絕望。
阿富汗電影《摘下面紗后的少女》（Osama）說(shuō)了個(gè)真實(shí)故事：塔利班統(tǒng)治期間，一個(gè)女孩父兄都在戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)期間身亡，母親失業(yè)，可是在塔利班政權(quán)嚴(yán)禁女孩在無(wú)男性家屬陪護(hù)的情況下出門(mén)，所以根本無(wú)法去工作。Osama只好女扮男裝出去找生路，每天都走在死亡線(xiàn)上。孰料不久，就被塔利班征去參加軍事訓(xùn)練，身份暴露，本應(yīng)判死刑，最后這個(gè)還未成年的少女被賞給塔利班一個(gè)妻妾成群的小頭目，從虎口走向了火坑。片中女性的絕望讓人觸目驚心?，F(xiàn)實(shí)生活也差不多，飾演女主角的演員電影演完后，命運(yùn)仍然沒(méi)有得到多少轉(zhuǎn)機(jī)。想來(lái)魏敏芝比她還要幸運(yùn)得多，好歹還去上了大學(xué)。
最悲慘的是柬埔寨的影片《插田人》（Rice People）。片中說(shuō)的一戶(hù)人家，只有一個(gè)男丁，卻在犁田的時(shí)候踩中刺中毒身亡。種植和養(yǎng)家的壓力幾乎是滅頂?shù)?，讓這個(gè)守寡的母親神志不清。最讓人感嘆的還是下一代的命運(yùn)，一季水稻還沒(méi)有插完，父死母瘋，大大小小七個(gè)女孩在近乎絕望的環(huán)境下，以血肉之軀阻擋命運(yùn)之輪對(duì)自己的傾軋。此片畫(huà)面優(yōu)美，但人物命運(yùn)實(shí)在悲慘，讓人感覺(jué)如同十八層地獄，一層層在面前打開(kāi)。更可怕的是，這不僅僅是電影，它是很多貧困地區(qū)女性的寫(xiě)實(shí)。
三部影片都把鏡頭對(duì)準(zhǔn)了在生活中掙扎的貧困少女。誠(chéng)如魯迅先生所言，悲劇就是把有價(jià)值的東西毀滅給人看?；蚴钦f(shuō)，把美毀滅給你看。
相對(duì)于這些地方而言，普通中國(guó)人的生活如若天堂一般。只是讓人無(wú)法心安的是，貧困地區(qū)的女性，生存仍然非常艱難。比如農(nóng)忙季節(jié)，農(nóng)村的婦女一般情況下非但要下田下地干活，回家還要做飯，清早還要洗衣，有的還要帶孩子。她們幾乎沒(méi)有什么辦法改變自己的命運(yùn)，沒(méi)有條件，沒(méi)有機(jī)會(huì)，也沒(méi)有人關(guān)注。她們不會(huì)來(lái)上網(wǎng)，也根本不會(huì)知道博客，她們沒(méi)有聲音?？墒撬齻兘^大部分人就如上面三部影片中那些女性一樣，十分堅(jiān)強(qiáng)，也十分樂(lè)觀，不管多少壓力，即便自己的生活四面楚歌，也要努力創(chuàng)造一個(gè)新的未來(lái)，送給自己的兒孫。
這樣去看電影，不知有無(wú)問(wèn)題。朱光潛老先生說(shuō)審美就要保持距離，無(wú)距離則無(wú)審美?？墒俏业人兹?，免不了還要把距離拉近，看看這里頭的真實(shí)人生。這幾部影片都在國(guó)際上有很高聲譽(yù)，可是大家寧可不看這樣的片子。世間少一奧斯卡，少一金熊，少一金棕櫚，太陽(yáng)照樣升起。讓一些人在絕望的深淵中看到亮光，則善莫大也！
http://family.mblogger.cn/berlinf
我相信，的瑪麗亞已經(jīng)找到了內(nèi)心真正的倚靠和歸屬，在輾轉(zhuǎn)于墮落的深淵之后，她心中的神，會(huì)眷顧這個(gè)有著堅(jiān)毅品格的善良少女。
片名叫萬(wàn)?，旣悂?，如同女主角的名字瑪麗亞，在影片中，宗教雖然沒(méi)有被公開(kāi)地談及，但是卻總是由始至終地貫穿在整部影片的背景中。就像我們的人生一樣，神明不是總是需要被時(shí)時(shí)提及和想起，但是在你需要幫助，在你感受到召喚的時(shí)候，它就會(huì)出現(xiàn)，在你身邊，給你力量。
阿富汗電影《摘下面紗后的少女》（Osama）說(shuō)了個(gè)真實(shí)故事：塔利班統(tǒng)治期間，一個(gè)女孩父兄都在戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)期間身亡，母親失業(yè)，可是在塔利班政權(quán)嚴(yán)禁女孩在無(wú)男性家屬陪護(hù)的情況下出門(mén)，所以根本無(wú)法去工作。Osama只好女扮男裝出去找生路，每天都走在死亡線(xiàn)上。孰料不久，就被塔利班征去參加軍事訓(xùn)練，身份暴露，本應(yīng)判死刑，最后這個(gè)還未成年的少女被賞給塔利班一個(gè)妻妾成群的小頭目，從虎口走向了火坑。片中女性的絕望讓人觸目驚心?，F(xiàn)實(shí)生活也差不多，飾演女主角的演員電影演完后，命運(yùn)仍然沒(méi)有得到多少轉(zhuǎn)機(jī)。想來(lái)魏敏芝比她還要幸運(yùn)得多，好歹還去上了大學(xué)。
最悲慘的是柬埔寨的影片《插田人》（Rice People）。片中說(shuō)的一戶(hù)人家，只有一個(gè)男丁，卻在犁田的時(shí)候踩中刺中毒身亡。種植和養(yǎng)家的壓力幾乎是滅頂?shù)?，讓這個(gè)守寡的母親神志不清。最讓人感嘆的還是下一代的命運(yùn)，一季水稻還沒(méi)有插完，父死母瘋，大大小小七個(gè)女孩在近乎絕望的環(huán)境下，以血肉之軀阻擋命運(yùn)之輪對(duì)自己的傾軋。此片畫(huà)面優(yōu)美，但人物命運(yùn)實(shí)在悲慘，讓人感覺(jué)如同十八層地獄，一層層在面前打開(kāi)。更可怕的是，這不僅僅是電影，它是很多貧困地區(qū)女性的寫(xiě)實(shí)。
三部影片都把鏡頭對(duì)準(zhǔn)了在生活中掙扎的貧困少女。誠(chéng)如魯迅先生所言，悲劇就是把有價(jià)值的東西毀滅給人看?；蚴钦f(shuō)，把美毀滅給你看。
相對(duì)于這些地方而言，普通中國(guó)人的生活如若天堂一般。只是讓人無(wú)法心安的是，貧困地區(qū)的女性，生存仍然非常艱難。比如農(nóng)忙季節(jié)，農(nóng)村的婦女一般情況下非但要下田下地干活，回家還要做飯，清早還要洗衣，有的還要帶孩子。她們幾乎沒(méi)有什么辦法改變自己的命運(yùn)，沒(méi)有條件，沒(méi)有機(jī)會(huì)，也沒(méi)有人關(guān)注。她們不會(huì)來(lái)上網(wǎng)，也根本不會(huì)知道博客，她們沒(méi)有聲音?？墒撬齻兘^大部分人就如上面三部影片中那些女性一樣，十分堅(jiān)強(qiáng)，也十分樂(lè)觀，不管多少壓力，即便自己的生活四面楚歌，也要努力創(chuàng)造一個(gè)新的未來(lái)，送給自己的兒孫。
這樣去看電影，不知有無(wú)問(wèn)題。朱光潛老先生說(shuō)審美就要保持距離，無(wú)距離則無(wú)審美?？墒俏业人兹?，免不了還要把距離拉近，看看這里頭的真實(shí)人生。這幾部影片都在國(guó)際上有很高聲譽(yù)，可是大家寧可不看這樣的片子。世間少一奧斯卡，少一金熊，少一金棕櫚，太陽(yáng)照樣升起。讓一些人在絕望的深淵中看到亮光，則善莫大也！
http://family.mblogger.cn/berlinf
驚心動(dòng)魄.
04柏林最佳女演員/Alfred Bauer獎(jiǎng)
震驚了，真的震驚了。把希望交給了“美國(guó)夢(mèng)”也同樣讓我震驚。
非常好看.
故事真實(shí)、平靜、扣人心弦。一切不露痕跡。
關(guān)于選擇。
我只是不喜歡結(jié)局。
美女～
原來(lái)姑娘光漂亮也沒(méi)用，還是得出身好
竟然沒(méi)有滑向更黑暗的結(jié)局。少女沒(méi)有回到哥倫比亞是在情理之中
人家17的時(shí)候都早戀懷孕販毒了，我17的時(shí)候還語(yǔ)文數(shù)學(xué)英語(yǔ)呢
美女。
美國(guó)夢(mèng)，中國(guó)夢(mèng)，哥倫比亞夢(mèng)。
萬(wàn)?，旣悂啠‖斃麃嗊\(yùn)毒成功，沒(méi)死，錢(qián)也得到了，我的心總算放下了。三百六十行，行行出狀元，看人家招聘員工、包裝毒品、細(xì)心指導(dǎo)服毒、運(yùn)毒一條龍工程，相當(dāng)技術(shù)活！社會(huì)大環(huán)境發(fā)展中、家庭條件太差，工作環(huán)境太差、搞個(gè)對(duì)象吧完蛋*的，這女主瑪利亞要改善捉襟見(jiàn)肘的生活，運(yùn)毒的確是最直接的方法。
貪婪 貧窮 落后 終于在最后肚子里的孩子那里看到希望
這其實(shí)是個(gè)關(guān)于夢(mèng)想的殘酷命題，冷靜的近乎冷漠。
2013Apr04，上海吳中路，IPAD PPTV。哥倫比亞
xzd 凱特琳娜·桑迪諾·莫雷諾
平淡得令人揪心
還行吧。