久久男人av资源网站无码不卡,在线精品网站色欲,国产欧美精品 一区二区三区,自拍偷亚洲成在线观看

播放地址

旅程終點

戰(zhàn)爭片英國2017

主演:保羅·貝坦尼  山姆·克拉弗林  阿薩·巴特菲爾德  

導(dǎo)演:索爾·迪勃

 劇照

旅程終點 劇照 NO.1旅程終點 劇照 NO.2旅程終點 劇照 NO.3旅程終點 劇照 NO.4旅程終點 劇照 NO.5旅程終點 劇照 NO.6旅程終點 劇照 NO.13旅程終點 劇照 NO.14旅程終點 劇照 NO.15旅程終點 劇照 NO.16旅程終點 劇照 NO.17旅程終點 劇照 NO.18旅程終點 劇照 NO.19旅程終點 劇照 NO.20
更新時間:2023-08-10 23:24

詳細(xì)劇情

一戰(zhàn)法國戰(zhàn)場,18歲的新兵中尉(阿薩·巴特菲爾德飾)靠童年舊友、現(xiàn)英雄長官斯坦霍普(山姆飾)的關(guān)系來到前線。但斯坦霍普已經(jīng)被戰(zhàn)爭改變得面目全非,他患上了幽閉恐懼癥,且狂躁易怒。

 長篇影評

 1 ) Depressed

“我看到David和我坐在前車座上,我們都是如此年輕。他想要比現(xiàn)在更好的東西,但我恰恰想擁有他現(xiàn)在的東西。我們都對生活感到迷茫,這種感覺就像聞到了煙草,汽水和香煙。和他的交談是我這輩子有過最好的一次。David覺得書籍的存在是讓他們從孤獨中醒來。如果我可以,我想對David說,和他在一起的那段時光提醒了我真正生活是什么,而不是從生活中得到解脫。所以我得告訴他,意識到這一點讓我感覺沒那么孤單了?!? ——David Lipsky

 2 ) You can be me, but not necessarily

HIMYM完結(jié)后再看到Marshall的臉是驚喜的 但是這部片子卻嚴(yán)肅很多 怎么說呢 著重人內(nèi)心的思考和感受 深沉卻不沉重吧 非常subtle的感動 如果你不喜歡日出日落三部曲的話癆風(fēng)的話 這部你可以pass了 但如果你喜歡人性思考不一定依賴于情節(jié)跌宕 go watch it.

一開始catch到我的是他說 人類的各種進(jìn)步 各種新穎的設(shè)備 各種看似promising的可能性其實都是在適應(yīng)feel more comfortably being alone 想想是的 PS啦XBOX啦有一臺陪伴你可以忘卻時間 還有虛擬現(xiàn)實甚至可以在自慰的時候幻化出一個不存在的親密對象 略荒誕又可怕 社會性是不是會受到挑戰(zhàn) 人類是否還需要交流 當(dāng)時想Wallace想得也夠多的 這都是現(xiàn)實要解決的科技進(jìn)步帶來的倫理命題

然后就安靜的看下去 感覺對話里充滿了不經(jīng)意的張弛和讓我心亦有戚戚焉的很多點 在judge別人的同時也更看清楚自己 有時會心地笑出聲來 直到我看到Lipsky流淚的時候 我也哭了 It feels like you are so close to someone's soul once and suddenly all of those special moments just vanish into nothing. You lost it. You can't help applying all those perspective to yourself and judging yourself. You realize how similar you are but you fear that the same time you get the fame you get all those trapped feelings and those parts would drag you into an bottomless hole.

參與這場旅行本身就是矛盾的 你作為個人想離他再近一點 但是作為一個記者你又要用媒體的眼光來看待這一切 你個人感同身受甚至為他精神世界里不得解的糾結(jié)隱隱作痛 你不想再聽下去 但是在感覺overwhelming的同時又雀躍得到了富有爭議性話題性的信息 矛盾但還是要動筆把這些復(fù)雜的深刻的自白用一種大眾希望看到的方式曝光 作為這樣一個復(fù)雜的存在 你不知是該保持距離還是relax 甚至不清楚你們算不算朋友

"I'm not so sure you wanna be me". When David said this to you, you said you don't. 在那一瞬間 你已經(jīng)下定決心不走這樣的路 你意識到會有這樣一種結(jié)局而你不必選擇它 能夠撥開那些你所仰望和追逐的愿景 這也許就是這段旅程最大的意義 而假設(shè)沒有做這段采訪日后trap yourself into the same difficult situation 誰來拯救你呢

Books existed to stop you from feeling lonely. 他曾經(jīng)說能讀下來1000多頁書的人內(nèi)心畢竟是有點孤獨的 我想起老爹說書有的時候毒害人 他反對我讀太多書可能就是怕我太感同身受而失去方向吧 思想空靈的人尤其不要想太多 會開始質(zhì)疑一切的意義 然后不經(jīng)意間毀了自己

人 畢竟要活著 與其思考虛無 不如踏踏實實游戲紅塵

還有最近才發(fā)現(xiàn)自己這么喜歡arthouse類別的電影 以后要多去電影節(jié)了

 3 ) The Big Ship

還記得兩三年前走進(jìn)這個城市的任何一間書店都能看到一藍(lán)一紅兩部磚頭書:David Foster Wallace的'Infinite Jest'和Roberto Bola?o的'2666'。後者已有中譯版,更成為一個文化地標(biāo)和文藝同人們互相識別的記號,而前者似乎還沒有任何中譯。 還記得幾年前不斷見到讀到聊到這兩部話題之(巨)作的時候,我也沒有產(chǎn)生要立即去讀的衝動,雖然家裡兩本書都買了,但也只是存著,想:就算現(xiàn)在不讀,但以後總有一天會的。前陣子,D開始讀2666,直覺告訴我他應(yīng)該是受了最近結(jié)識的一位著名策展人/文化實踐者的影響。這些日子D時常會給我念書裡的一些精彩片段,已然被征服。 繞了一個彎兒,其實我想說的是,DFW說的那段話(大意為):在你僅僅只是一個寫作者的時候,你總是用「那些出了名的寫的都是垃圾」來安慰自己,後來你成了名作家,大家都說你真牛逼的時候,你卻發(fā)現(xiàn)這件事的弔詭之處:你自己寫的東西是不是也只是垃圾呢?看到這裡我哈哈笑了出來。 是啊,那些書展、發(fā)佈會、朗讀會、採訪、駐場、研討會;那些頭巾、鬍子、圓眼鏡、油膩的長髮,髒的棉大衣,都在閃著雪花點不停跳頻的電視屏幕上。那些可樂、爆米花、麥當(dāng)勞、pop-tarts, m&m's, licorice and lollies...是無處不在的雪,是結(jié)冰的河面,是因為你把牠們丟在家裡一個禮拜不管於是在你地板上拉屎的狗,是教堂裡人們跟著70年代的音樂和舞步踏起的灰塵,在陽光下跳著。 是在一個最冷的冬天的早上,背起行李,打開房門,走到灰藍(lán)的街景裡,一切還沒有甦醒,但你卻因為這件要做的事,這個要見的人,而清醒而雀躍。 註:中文簡體版'Infinite Jest'將於2017年由世紀(jì)文景出版,譯者為俞冰夏。(至2018年12月尚未出版)[ 2023年初在網(wǎng)上看到review copy, 期待出版]

 4 ) 談話是人類進(jìn)步的階梯

      貌似每一個文青都會夢想著邋里邋遢地坐在電腦前,當(dāng)一個作家,滿世界飛,去簽售,去接受敬仰,然后再回到家里,邋里邋遢地隨性生活。這只不過是不切實際的幻想而已,而已。并不是有思想的人都能寫得一手好文章。個人認(rèn)為,能夠?qū)懙暮梦恼碌娜耍⒉粌H僅要求對生活有細(xì)心的觀察,還要有那種從正常的生活中短暫地甚至是長時間地抽離的過程。真正看透生活的人,我指的不是那種享受生活的人,而是看透生活的人。并不是每一個看透生活的人都熱愛生活,這種人是英雄。也并不是每一個享受生活的人都能夠看透生活。能看透生活,不僅僅需要天賦過人,還需要教育和契機(jī)。真正看透生活的人,是聰明而敏感的。
     毫無疑問,我認(rèn)為旅程終點里面的兩個作家是看透了生活的人們。他們接受過高等教育,說不定也和家庭的背景有很大的關(guān)系,那種潛移默化的指引和教育。他們擁有那種冷眼旁觀的態(tài)度。他們有那種敏感的心靈。他們有敢于打斷別人說話,敢于不掩飾地展示自己的想法的坦蕩。他們有從生活中抽離出來的經(jīng)歷。他們惺惺相惜……
      他們惺惺相惜!
      他們知道,這種敏感,聰明的人的生活是不容易的。即使表現(xiàn)地很堅強,生活得很悠閑。正是因為敏感,他們知道人們真正在想什么;正是因為聰明,他們知道人們?yōu)槭裁床辉谙肫渌?。這種洞悉人們想法的能力,進(jìn)一步,這種洞悉生活的能力是恩賜的也是苦惱的。這樣的人不好相處,渾身棱角。然而,兩個渾身棱角的在一起,雖然有刮蹭,但就是有時候會契合的。會互相指著自己的傷口,然后相視一笑。
      其實,談話對于普通人是必要的,對于精英,也是必要的。只是每個人對于談話的期待是不一樣的。有時候,我們僅僅是想要讓別人知道什么,或者從別人那里了解一些東西。而有時候,我們希望得到和自己水平相當(dāng)?shù)恼勗捹|(zhì)量。長時間的得不到這種高質(zhì)量的談話,就像是敗血癥一樣,是不健康的心靈和肉體。在這種意義上說,令人愉快的談話時可遇而不可求的。遇上了,就好好珍惜吧,全神貫注的去談話吧。在談話中,我們不僅僅在上傳,我們也在下載。一種從未體驗過的生活,被以同自己一樣的苛刻的方式被審視著,這種惺惺相惜之感是多么能讓人會心一笑啊。
       特別喜歡這種話癆的電影,愛在三部曲,年輕氣盛,旅程終點。當(dāng)然是在心情好,平和的時候。哈哈。這種電影有一點好,就是根本沒有劇情,所以也就沒有什么期待。說不定哪一句話就觸動了我的神經(jīng)。哎,對,就像是隨著電影中的人一起對話,不過當(dāng)然了,看他們的對話以我的水平是不敢妄稱相稱的,不得不承認(rèn),有時候邏輯跟不上了還需要倒回去看。不過我很享受這種過程。就像是在讀某一本你根本不會懂的書一樣,說不定哪句不著邊際的話就擊中你了,說不定的。比如這次的旅程終點,小david就為什么自己三十歲不結(jié)婚說了說關(guān)于婚姻的看法。我覺的就挺對我口味的。他說,結(jié)婚的那個人是要在一起三十年四十年的,這就需要那個人能夠接受或者包容我的各種狀態(tài),生理的,心理的。人們的生活并不是一成不變的,每個人也都在改變著。他說出了,我認(rèn)為很對的,婚姻的兩個要素,包容和改變。只有長時間的相處,在一起生活,才能知道這個女人是否和我相適應(yīng)。當(dāng)然了,婚姻這東西是相互的,我也要適應(yīng)那個女人。但是這是我自己的影評,我想從哪個角度寫,我就從哪個角度寫,哈哈哈~
      依舊,我還是喜歡話癆片~

 5 ) The Lost Years & Last Days of David Foster Wallace

In case anyone needs to read it.

source:
http://kurtrudder.blogspot.jp/2009/01/lost-years-last-days-of-david-foster.html

issue:
1064 Rolling Stone, Oct. 30, 2008

autour:
David Lipsky

The Lost Years & Last Days of David Foster Wallace
He was the greatest writer of his generation - and also its most tormented. In the wake of his tragic suicide, his friends and family reveal the lifelong struggle of a beautiful mind

by David Lipsky

He was six-feet-two, and on a good day he weighed 200 pounds. He wore granny glasses with a head scarf, points knotted at the back, a look that was both pirate-like and housewife-ish. He always wore his hair long. He had dark eyes, soft voice, caveman chin, a lovely, peak-lipped mouth that was his best feature. He walked with an ex-athlete's saunter, a roll from the heels, as if anything physical was a pleasure. David Foster Wallace worked surprising turns on nearly everything: novels, journalism, vacation. His life was an information hunt, collecting hows and whys. "I received 500,000 discrete bits of information today," he once said, "of which maybe 25 are important. My job is to make some sense of it." He wanted to write "stuff about what it feels like to live. Instead of being a relief from what it feels like to live." Readers curled up in the nooks and clearings of his style: his comedy, his brilliance, his humaneness.

His life was a map that ends at the wrong destination. Wallace was an A student through high school, he played football, he played tennis, he wrote a philosophy thesis and a novel before he graduated from Amherst, he went to writing school, published the novel, made a city of squalling, bruising, kneecapping editors and writers fall moony-eyed in love with him. He published a thousand-page novel, received the only award you get in the nation for being a genius, wrote essays providing the best feel anywhere of what it means to be alive in the contemporary world, accepted a special chair at California's Pomona College to teach writing, married, published another book and, last month, hanged himself at age 46.

"The one thing that really should be said about David Foster Wallace is that this was a once-in-a-century talent," says his friend and former editor Colin Harrison. "We may never see a guy like this again in our lifetimes — that I will shout out. He was like a comet flying by at ground level."

His 1996 novel, Infinite Jest, was Bible-size and spawned books of interpretation and commentary, like Understanding David Foster Wallace — a book his friends might have tried to write and would have lined up to buy. He was clinically depressed for decades, information he limited to family and his closest friends. "I don't think that he ever lost the feeling that there was something shameful about this," his father says. "His instinct was to hide it."

After he died on September 12th, readers crowded the Web with tributes to his generosity, his intelligence. "But he wasn't Saint Dave," says Jonathan Franzen, Wallace's best friend and the author of The Corrections. "This is the paradox of Dave: The closer you get, the darker the picture, but the more genuinely lovable he was. It was only when you knew him better that you had a true appreciation of what a heroic struggle it was for him not merely to get along in the world, but to produce wonderful writing."

David grew up in Champaign, Illinois. His father, Jim, taught philosophy at the University of Illinois. His mother, Sally, taught English at a local community college. It was an academic household — poised, considerate — language games in the car, the rooms tidy, the bookcase the hero. "I have these weird early memories," Wallace told me during a series of interviews in 1996. "I remember my parents reading Ulysses out loud to each other in bed, holding hands and both lovin' something really fiercely." Sally hated to get angry — it took her days to recover from a shout. So the family developed a sort of interoffice conflict mail. When his mother had something stern to say, she'd write it up in a letter. When David wanted something badly — raised allowance, more liberal bedtime — he'd slide a letter under his parents' door.

David was one of those eerie, perfect combinations of two parents' skills. The titles of his father's books — Ethical Norms, Particular Cases — have the sound of Wallace short-story titles. The tone of his mother's speaking voice contains echoes of Wallace's writing voice: Her textbook, Practically Painless English, sounds like a Wallace joke. She uses phrases like "perishing hot" for very hot, "snoof" for talking in your sleep, "heave your skeleton" for go to bed. "David and I both owe a huge debt to my mother," says his sister, Amy, two years younger. "She has a way of talking that I've never heard anywhere else."

David was, from an early age, "very fragile," as he put it. He loved TV, and would get incredibly excited watching a program like Batman or The Wild Wild West. (His parents rationed the "rough" shows. One per week.) David could memorize whole shows of dialogue and predict, like a kind of plot weatherman, when the story was going to turn, where characters would end up. No one saw or treated him as a genius, but at age 14, when he asked what his father did, Jim sat David down and walked him through a Socratic dialogue. "I was astonished by how sophisticated his understanding was," Jim says. "At that point, I figured out that he really, really was extraordinarily bright."

David was a big-built kid; he played football — quarterback — until he was 12 or 13, and would always speak like an athlete, the disappearing G's, "wudn't," "dudn't" and "idn't" and "sumpin'." "The big thing I was when I was little was a really serious jock," Wallace told me. "I mean, I had no artistic ambition. I played citywide football. And I was really good. Then I got to junior high, and there were two guys in the city who were better quarterbacks than me. And people started hitting each other a lot harder, and I discovered that I didn't really love to hit people. That was a huge disappointment." After his first day of football practice at Urbana High School, he came home and chucked it. He offered two explanations to his parents: They expected him to practice every day, and the coaches did too much cursing.

He had also picked up a racket. "I discovered tennis on my own," Wallace said, "taking public-park lessons. For five years, I was seriously gonna be a pro tennis player. I didn't look that good, but I was almost impossible to beat. I know that sounds arrogant. It's true." On court, he was a bit of a hustler: Before a match, he'd tell his opponent, "Thank you for being here, but you're just going to cream me."

By the time he was 14, he felt he could have made nationals. "Really be in the junior show. But just at the point it became important to me, I began to choke. The more scared you get, the worse you play." Plus it was the Seventies — Pink Floyd, bongs. "I started to smoke a lot of pot when I was 15 or 16, and it's hard to train." He laughed. "You don't have that much energy."

It was around this time that the Wallaces noticed something strange about David. He would voice surprising requests, like wanting to paint his bedroom black. He was constantly angry at his sister. When he was 16, he refused to go to her birthday party. "Why would I want to celebrate her birthday?" he told his parents.

"David began to have anxiety attacks in high school," his father recalls. "I noticed the symptoms, but I was just so unsophisticated about these matters. The depression seemed to take the form of an evil spirit that just haunted David." Sally came to call it the "black hole with teeth." David withdrew. "He spent a lot of time throwing up junior year," his sister remembers. One wall of his bedroom was lined with cork, for magazine photos of tennis stars. David pinned an article about Kafka to the wall, with the headline THE DISEASE WAS LIFE ITSELF.

"I hated seeing those words," his sister tells me, and starts to cry. "They seemed to sum up his existence. We couldn't understand why he was acting the way he was, and so of course my parents were exasperated, lovingly exasperated."

David graduated high school with perfect grades. Whatever his personal hurricane was, it had scattered trees and moved on. He decided to go to Amherst, which is where his father had gone, too. His parents told him he would enjoy the Berkshire autumn. Instead, he missed home — the farms and flat horizons, roads stretching contentedly nowhere. "It's fall," David wrote back. "The mountains are pretty, but the landscape isn't beautiful the way Illinois is."

Wallace had lugged his bags into Amherst the fall of 1980 — Reagan coming in, the Seventies capsized, preppies everywhere. He brought a suit to campus. "It was kind of a Sears suit, with this Scotch-plaid tie," says his college roommate and close friend Mark Costello, who went on to become a successful novelist himself. "Guys who went to Amherst, who came from five prep schools, they always dress a notch down. No one's bringing a suit. That was just the Wallace sense that going East is a big deal, and you have to not embarrass us. My first impression was that he was really very out of step."

Costello came from working-class Massachusetts, seven kids, Irish-Catholic household. He and Wallace connected. "Neither of us fit into the Gatsby-ite mold," Costello says. At Amherst David perfected the style he would wear for the rest of his life: turtleneck, hoodie, big basketball shoes. The look of parking-lot kids who in Illinois were called Dirt Bombs. "A slightly tough, slightly waste-product-y, tennis-playing persona," Costello says. Wallace was also amazingly fast and good company, even just on a walk across campus. "I'd always wanted to be an impressionist," Wallace said, "but I just didn't have an agile enough vocal and facial register to do it." Crossing a green, it was The Dave Show. He would recount how people walked, talked, held their heads, pictured their lives. "Just very connected to people," Costello recalls. "Dave had this ability to be inside someone else's skin."

Observing people from afar, of course, can be a way of avoiding them up close. "I was a complete just total banzai weenie studier in college," Wallace recalled. "I was really just scared of people. For instance, I would brave the TV pit — the central TV room — to watch Hill Street Blues, 'cause that was a really important show to me."

One afternoon, April of sophomore year, Costello came back to the dorm they shared and found Wallace seated in his chair. Desk clean, bags packed, even his typewriter, which weighed as much as the clothes put together.

"Dave, what's going on?" Costello asked.

"I'm sorry, I'm so sorry," Wallace said. "I know I'm really screwing you."

He was pulling out of college. Costello drove him to the airport. "He wasn't able to talk about it," Costello recalls. "He was crying, he was mortified. Panicky. He couldn't control his thoughts. It was mental incontinence, the equivalent of wetting his pants."

"I wasn't very happy there," Wallace told me later. "I felt kind of inadequate. There was a lot of stuff I wanted to read that wasn't part of any class. And Mom and Dad were just totally cool."

Wallace went home to hospitalization, explanations to his parents, a job. For a while, he drove a school bus. "Here he was, a guy who was really shaky, kind of Holden Caulfield, driving a school bus through lightning storms," Costello recalls. "He wrote me a letter all outraged, about the poor screening procedures for school-bus drivers in central Illinois."

Wallace would visit his dad's philosophy classes. "The classes would turn into a dialogue between David and me," his father remembers. "The students would just sit looking around, 'Who is this guy?' " Wallace devoured novels — "pretty much everything I've read was read during that year." He also told his parents how he'd felt at school. "He would talk about just being very sad, and lonely," Sally says. "It didn't have anything to do with being loved. He just was very lonely inside himself."

He returned to Amherst in the fall, to room with Costello, shaky but hardened. "Certain things had been destroyed in his head," Costello says. "In the first half of his Amherst career, he was trying to be a regular person. He was on the debate team, the sort of guy who knows he's going to be a success." Wallace had talked about going into politics; Costello recalls him joking, "No one is going to vote for somebody who's been in a nuthouse." Having his life fall apart narrowed his sense of what his options were — and the possibilities that were left became more real to him. In a letter to Costello, he wrote, "I want to write books that people will read 100 years from now."

Back at school junior year, he never talked much about his breakdown. "It was embarrassing and personal," Costello says. "A zone of no jokes." Wallace regarded it as a failure, something he should have been able to control. He routinized his life. He'd be the first tray at the dining hall for supper, he'd eat, drink coffee dipped with tea bags, library study till 11, head back to the room, turn on Hawaii Five-O, then a midnight gulp from a scotch bottle. When he couldn't turn his mind off, he'd say, "You know what? I think this is a two-shot night," slam another and sleep.

In 1984, Costello left for Yale Law School; Wallace was alone senior year. He double-majored — English and philosophy, which meant two big writing projects. In philosophy, he took on modal logic. "It looked really hard, and I was really scared about it," he said. "So I thought I'd do this kind of jaunty, hundred-page novel." He wrote it in five months, and it clocked in at 700 pages. He called it The Broom of the System.

Wallace published stories in the Amherst literary magazine. One was about depression and a tricyclic anti-anxiety medication he had been on for two months. The medication "made me feel like I was stoned and in hell," he told me. The story dealt with the in-hell parts:

You are the sickness yourself.... You realize all this...when you look at the black hole and it's wearing your face. That's when the Bad Thing just absolutely eats you up, or rather when you just eat yourself up. When you kill yourself. All this business about people committing suicide when they're "severely depressed;" we say, "Holy cow, we must do something to stop them from killing themselves!" That's wrong. Because all these people have, you see, by this time already killed themselves, where it really counts.... When they "commit suicide," they're just being orderly.

It wasn't just writing the novel that made Wallace realize his future would lie in fiction. He also helped out friends by writing their papers. In a comic book, this would be his origin story, the part where he's bombarded with gamma rays, bitten by the spider. "I remember realizing at the time, 'Man, I'm really good at this. I'm a weird kind of forger. I can sound kind of like anybody.' "

Grad school was next. Philosophy would be an obvious choice. "My dad would have limbs removed without anesthetic before ever pushing his kids about anything," Wallace said. "But I knew I was gonna have to go to grad school. I applied to these English programs instead, and I didn't tell anybody. Writing The Broom of the System, I felt like I was using 97 percent of me, whereas philosophy was using 50 percent."

After Amherst, Wallace went to the University of Arizona for an MFA. It was where he picked up the bandanna: "I started wearing them in Tucson because it was a hundred degrees all the time, and I would perspire so much I would drip on the page." The woman he was dating thought the bandanna was a wise move. "She was like a Sixties lady, a Sufi Muslim. She said there were various chakras, and one of the big ones she called the spout hole, at the very top of your cranium. Then I began thinking about the phrase 'Keeping your head together.' It makes me feel kind of creepy that people view it as a trademark or something — it's more a recognition of a weakness, which is that I'm just kind of worried that my head's gonna explode."

Arizona was a strange experience: the first classrooms where people weren't happy to see him. He wanted to write the way he wanted to write — funny and overstuffed and nonlinear and strange. The teachers were all "hardass realists." That was the first problem. Problem two was Wallace. "I think I was kind of a prick," he said. "I was just unteachable. I had that look — 'If there were any justice, I'd be teaching this class' — that makes you want to slap a student." One of his stories, "Here and There," went on to win a 1989 O. Henry Prize after it was published in a literary magazine. When he turned it in to his professor, he received a chilly note back: "I hope this isn't representative of the work you're hoping to do for us. We'd hate to lose you."

"What I hated was how disingenuous it was," Wallace recalled. "'We'd hate to lose you.' You know, if you're gonna threaten, say that."

Wallace sent his thesis project out to agents. He got a lot of letters back: "Best of luck in your janitorial career." Bonnie Nadell was 25, working a first job at San Francisco's Frederick Hill Agency. She opened a letter from Wallace, read a chapter from his book. "I loved it so much," Nadell says. It turned out there was a writer named David Rains Wallace. Hill and Nadell agreed that David should insert his mother's maiden name, which is how he became David Foster Wallace. She remained his agent for the rest of his life. "I have this thing, the nearest Jewish mother, I will simply put my arms around her skirt and just attach myself," Wallace said. "I don't know what it means. Maybe sort of WASP deprivation."

Viking won the auction for the novel, "with something like a handful of trading stamps." Word spread; professors turned nice. "I went from borderline ready-to-get-kicked-out to all these tight-smiled guys being, 'Glad to see you, we're proud of you, you'll have to come over for dinner.' It was so delicious: I felt kind of embarrassed for them, they didn't even have integrity about their hatred."

Wallace went to New York to meet his editor, Gerry Howard, wearing a U2 T-shirt. "He seemed like a very young 24," Howard says. The shirt impressed him. "U2 wasn't really huge then. And there's a hypersincerity to U2, which I think David was in tune with — or that he really wanted to be sincere, even though his brain kept turning him in the direction of the ironic." Wallace kept calling Howard — who was only 36 — "Mr. Howard," never "Gerry." It would become his business style: a kind of mock formality. People often suspected it was a put-on. What it was was Midwestern politeness, the burnout in the parking lot still nodding "sir" to the vice principal. "There was kind of this hum of superintelligence behind the 'aw, shucks' manner," Howard recalls.

The Broom of the System was published in January of 1987, Wallace's second and last year at Arizona. The title referred to something his mother's grandmother used to say, as in, "Here, Sally, have an apple, it's the broom of the system." "I wasn't aware David had picked up on that," his mother says. "I was thrilled that a family expression became the title of his book."

The novel hit. "Everything you could hope for," Howard says. "Critics praised it, it sold quite well, and David was off to the races."

His first brush with fame was a kind of gateway experience. Wallace would open The Wall Street Journal, see his face transmuted into a dot-cartoon. "Some article like 'Hotshot's Weird New Novel,' " he said. "I'd feel really good, really cool, for exactly 10 seconds. Probably not unlike a crack high, you know? I was living an incredibly American life: 'Boy, if I could just achieve X, Y and Z, everything would be OK.' " Howard bought Wallace's second book, Girl With Curious Hair, a collection of the stories he was finishing up at Arizona. But something in Wallace worried him. "I have never encountered a mind like David's," he says. "It functioned at such an amazingly high level, he clearly lived in a hyperalert state. But on the other hand, I felt that David's emotional life lagged far behind his mental life. And I think he could get lost in the gap between the two."

Wallace was already drifting into the gap. He won a Whiting Writers' Award — stood on a stage with Eudora Welty — graduated Arizona, went to an artists' colony, met famous writers, knew the famous writers were seeing his name in more magazines ("absolutely exhilarating and really scary at the same time"), finished the stories. And then he was out of ideas. He tried to write in a cabin in Tucson for a while, then returned home to write — Mom and Dad doing the grocery shopping. He accepted a one-year slot teaching philosophy at Amherst, which was strange: Sophomores he had known were now his students. In the acknowledgments for the book he was completing, he thanks "The Mr. and Mrs. Wallace Fund for Aimless Children."

He was balled up, tied up. "I started hating everything I did," he said. "Worse than stuff I'd done in college. Hopelessly confused, unbelievably bad. I was really in a panic, I didn't think I was going to be able to write anymore. And I got this idea: I'd flourished in an academic environment — my first two books had sort of been written under professors." He applied to graduate programs in philosophy, thinking he could write fiction in his spare time. Harvard offered a full scholarship. The last thing he needed to reproduce his college years was to reactivate Mark Costello.

"So he comes up with this whole cockamamie plan," Costello recalls. "He says, 'OK, you're going to go back to Boston, practice law, and I'm going to go to Harvard. We'll live together — it'll be just like the house we had at Amherst.' It all ended up being a train wreck."

They found an apartment in Somerville. Student ghetto: rickety buildings, outdoor staircases. Costello would come home with his briefcase, click up the back stairs, David would call out, "Hi, honey, how was your day?" But Wallace wasn't writing fiction. He had thought course work would be a sideline; but professors expected actual work.

Not writing was the kind of symptom that presents a problem of its own. "He could get himself into places where he was pretty helpless," Costello says. "Basically it was the same symptoms all along: this incredible sense of inadequacy, panic. He once said to me that he wanted to write to shut up the babble in his head. He said when you're writing well, you establish a voice in your head, and it shuts up the other voices. The ones that are saying, 'You're not good enough, you're a fraud.' "

"Harvard was just unbelievably bleak," Wallace said. It became a substance marathon: drinking, parties, drugs. "I didn't want to feel it," he said. "It was the only time in my life that I'd gone to bars, picked up women I didn't know." Then for weeks, he would quit drinking, start mornings with a 10-mile run. "You know, this kind of very American sports training — I will fix this by taking radical action." Schwarzenegger voice: "If there's a problem, I will train myself out of it. I will work harder."

Various delays were holding up the publication of his short-story collection Girl With Curious Hair. He started to feel spooked. "I'm this genius writer," he remembered. "Everything I do's gotta be ingenious, blah, blah, blah, blah." The five-year clock was ticking again. He'd played football for five years. Then he'd played high-level tennis for five years. Now he'd been writing for five years. "What I saw was, 'Jesus, it's the same thing all over again.' I'd started late, showed tremendous promise — and the minute I felt the implications of that promise, it caved in. Because see, by this time, my ego's all invested in the writing. It's the only thing I've gotten food pellets from the universe for. So I feel trapped: 'Uh-oh, my five years is up, I've gotta move on.' But I didn't want to move on."

Costello watched while Wallace slipped into a depressive crisis. "He was hanging out with women who were pretty heavily into drugs — that was kind of alluring to Dave — skanking around Somerville, drinking himself blotto."

It was the worst period Wallace had ever gone through. "It may have been what in the old days was called a spiritual crisis," he said. "It was just feeling as though every axiom of your life turned out to be false. And there was nothing, and you were nothing — it was all a delusion. But you were better than everyone else because you saw that it was a delusion, and yet you were worse because you couldn't function."

By November, the anxieties had become locked and fixed. "I got really worried I was going to kill myself. And I knew, that if anybody was fated to fuck up a suicide attempt, it was me." He walked across campus to Health Services and told a psychiatrist, "Look, there's this issue. I don't feel real safe."

"It was a big deal for me, because I was so embarrassed," Wallace said. "But it was the first time I ever treated myself like I was worth something."

By making his announcement, Wallace had activated a protocol: Police were notified, he had to withdraw from school. He was sent to McLean, which, as psychiatric hospitals go, is pedigreed: Robert Lowell, Sylvia Plath, Anne Sexton all put in residences there; it's the setting for the memoir Girl, Interrupted. Wallace spent his first day on suicide watch. Locked ward, pink room, no furniture, drain in the floor, observation slot in the door. "When that happens to you," David said, smiling, "you get unprecedentedly willing to examine other alternatives for how to live."

Wallace spent eight days in McLean. He was diagnosed as a clinical depressive and was prescribed a drug, called Nardil, developed in the 1950s. He would have to take it from then on. "We had a brief, maybe three-minute audience with the psychopharmacologist," his mother says. Wallace would have to quit drinking, and there was a long list of foods — certain cheeses, pickles, cured meats — he would have to stay away from.

He started to clean up. He found a way to get sober, worked very hard at it, and wouldn't drink for the rest of his life. Girl With Curious Hair finally appeared in 1989. Wallace gave a reading in Cambridge; 13 people showed up, including a schizophrenic woman who shrieked all the way through his performance. "The book's coming out seemed like a kind of shrill, jagged laugh from the universe, this thing sort of lingering behind me like a really nasty fart."

What followed was a phased, deliberate return to the world. He worked as a security guard, morning shift, at Lotus Software. Polyester uniform, service baton, walking the corridors. "I liked it because I didn't have to think," he said. "Then I quit for the incredibly brave reason that I got tired of getting up so early in the morning."

Next, he worked at a health club in Auburndale, Massachusetts. "Very chichi," he said. "They called me something other than a towel boy, but I was in effect a towel boy. I'm sitting there, and who should walk in to get their towel but Michael Ryan. Now, Michael Ryan had received a Whiting Writers' Award the same year I had. So I see this guy that I'd been up on the fucking rostrum with, having Eudora Welty give us this prize. It's two years later — it's the only time I've literally dived under something. He came in, and I pretended not very subtly to slip, and lay facedown, and didn't respond. I left that day, and I didn't go back."

He wrote Bonnie Nadell a letter; he was done with writing. That wasn't exactly her first concern. "I was worried he wasn't going to survive," she says. He filled in Howard, too. "I contemplated the circumstance that the best young writer in America was handing out towels in a health club," Howard says. "How fucking sad."

Wallace met Jonathan Franzen in the most natural way for an author: as a fan. He sent Franzen a nice letter about his first novel, The Twenty-Seventh City. Franzen wrote back, they arranged to meet in Cambridge. "He just flaked," Franzen recalls. "He didn't show up. That was a fairly substance-filled period of his life."

By April of 1992, both were ready for a change. They loaded Franzen's car and headed for Syracuse to scout apartments. Franzen needed "somewhere to relocate with my wife where we could both afford to live and not have anyone tell us how screwed up our marriage was." Wallace's need was simpler: cheap space, for writing. He had been researching for months, haunting rehab facilities and halfway houses, taking quiet note of voices and stories, people who had fallen into the gaps like him. "I got very assertive research- and finagle-wise," he said. "I spent hundreds of hours at three halfway houses. It turned out you could just sit in the living room — nobody is as gregarious as somebody who has recently stopped using drugs."

He and Franzen talked a lot about what writing should be for. "We had this feeling that fiction ought to be good for something," Franzen says. "Basically, we decided it was to combat loneliness." They would talk about lots of Wallace's ideas, which could abruptly sharpen into self-criticism. "I remember this being a frequent topic of conversation," Franzen says, "his notion of not having an authentic self. Of being just quick enough to construct a pleasing self for whomever he was talking to. I see now he wasn't just being funny — there was something genuinely compromised in David. At the time I thought, 'Wow, he's even more self-conscious than I am.' "

Wallace spent a year writing in Syracuse. "I lived in an apartment that was seriously the size of the foyer of an average house. I really liked it. There were so many books, you couldn't move around. When I'd want to write, I'd have to put all the stuff from the desk on the bed, and when I'd want to sleep, I would have to put all the stuff on the desk."

Wallace worked longhand, pages piling up. "You look at the clock and seven hours have passed and your hand is cramped," Wallace said. He'd have pens he considered hot — cheap Bic ballpoints, like batters have bats that are hot. A pen that was hot he called the orgasm pen.

In the summer of 1993, he took an academic job 50 miles from his parents, at Illinois State University at Normal. The book was three-quarters done. Based on the first unruly stack of pages, Nadell had been able to sell it to Little, Brown. He had put his whole life into it — tennis, and depression, and stoner afternoons, and the precipice of rehab, and all the hours spent with Amy watching TV. The plot motor is a movie called Infinite Jest, so soothing and perfect it's impossible to switch off: You watch until you sink into your chair, spill your bladder, starve, die. "If the book's about anything," he said, "it's about the question of why am I watching so much shit? It's not about the shit. It's about me: Why am I doing it? The original title was A Failed Entertainment, and the book is structured as an entertainment that doesn't work" — characters developing and scattering, chapters disordered — "because what entertainment ultimately leads to is 'Infinite Jest,' that's the star it's steering by."

Wallace held classes in his house, students nudging aside books like Compendium of Drug Therapy and The Emergence of the French Art Film, making jokes about Mount Manuscript, David's pile of novel. He had finished and collected the three years of drafts, and finally sat down and typed the whole thing. Wallace didn't really type; he input the giant thing twice, with one finger. "But a really fast finger."

It came to almost 1,700 pages. "I was just terrified how long it would end up being," he said. Wallace told his editor it would be a good beach book, in the sense that people could use it for shade.

It can take a year to edit a book, re-edit it, print it, publicize it, ship it, the writer all the time checking his watch. In the meantime, Wallace turned to nonfiction. Two pieces, published in Harper's, would become some of the most famous pieces of journalism of the past decade and a half.

Colin Harrison, Wallace's editor at Harper's, had the idea to outfit him with a notebook and push him into perfectly American places — the Illinois State Fair, a Caribbean cruise. It would soak up the side of Wallace that was always on, always measuring himself. "There would be Dave the mimic, Dave the people-watcher," Costello says. "Asking him to actually report could get stressful and weird and complicated. Colin had this stroke of genius about what to do with David. It was a much simpler solution than anyone ever thought."

In the pieces, Wallace invented a style writers have plundered for a decade. The unedited camera, the feed before the director in the van starts making choices and cuts. The voice was humane, a big, kind brain tripping over its own lumps. "The Harper's pieces were me peeling back my skull," Wallace said. "You know, welcome to my mind for 20 pages, see through my eyes, here's pretty much all the French curls and crazy circles. The trick was to have it be honest but also interesting — because most of our thoughts aren't all that interesting. To be honest with a motive." He laughed. "There's a certain persona created, that's a little stupider and schmuckier than I am."

The cruise-ship piece ran in January 1996, a month before David's novel was published. People photocopied it, faxed it to each other, read it over the phone. When people tell you they're fans of David Foster Wallace, what they're often telling you is that they've read the cruise-ship piece; Wallace would make it the title essay in his first collection of journalism, A Supposedly Fun Thing I'll Never Do Again. In a way, the difference between the fiction and the nonfiction reads as the difference between Wallace's social self and his private self. The essays were endlessly charming, they were the best friend you'd ever have, spotting everything, whispering jokes, sweeping you past what was irritating or boring or awful in humane style. Wallace's fiction, especially after Infinite Jest, would turn chilly, dark, abstract. You could imagine the author of the fiction sinking into a depression. The nonfiction writer was an impervious sun.

The novel came out in February of 1996. In New York Magazine, Walter Kirn wrote, "The competition has been obliterated. It's as though Paul Bunyan had joined the NFL, or Wittgenstein had gone on Jeopardy! The novel is that colossally disruptive. And that spectacularly good." He was in Newsweek, Time, Hollywood people appeared at his readings, women batted their eyelashes, men in the back rows scowled, envied. A FedEx guy rang his bell, watched David sign for delivery, asked, "How's it feel to be famous?"

At the end of his book tour, I spent a week with David. He talked about the "greasy thrill of fame" and what it might mean to his writing. "When I was 25, I would've given a couple of digits off my non-use hand for this," he said. "I feel good, because I wanna be doing this for 40 more years, you know? So I've got to find some way to enjoy this that doesn't involve getting eaten by it."

He was astonishingly good, quick company, making you feel both wide awake and as if your shoes had been tied together. He'd say things like, "There's good self-consciousness, and then there's toxic, paralyzing, raped-by-psychic-Bedouins self-consciousness." He talked about a kind of shyness that turned social life impossibly complicated. "I think being shy basically means being self-absorbed to the point that it makes it difficult to be around other people. For instance, if I'm hanging out with you, I can't even tell whether I like you or not because I'm too worried about whether you like me."

He said one interviewer had devoted tons of energy to the genius question. "That was his whole thing, 'Are you normal?' 'Are you normal?' I think one of the true ways I've gotten smarter is that I've realized that there are ways other people are a lot smarter than me. My biggest asset as a writer is that I'm pretty much like everybody else. The parts of me that used to think I was different or smarter or whatever almost made me die."

It had been difficult, during the summer, to watch his sister get married. "I'm almost 35. I would like to get married and have kids. I haven't even started to work that shit out yet. I've come close a few times, but I tend to be interested in women that I turn out to not get along very well with. I have friends who say this is something that would be worth looking into with someone that you pay."

Wallace was always dating somebody. "There were a lot of relationships," Amy says. He dated in his imaginative life too: When I visited him, one wall was taped with a giant Alanis Morissette poster. "The Alanis Morissette obsession followed the Melanie Griffith obsession — a six-year obsession," he said. "It was preceded by something that I will tell you I got teased a lot for, which was a terrible Margaret Thatcher obsession. All through college: posters of Margaret Thatcher, and ruminations on Margaret Thatcher. Having her really enjoy something I said, leaning forward and covering my hand with hers."

He tended to date high-strung women — another symptom of his shyness. "Say what you want about them, psychotics tend to make the first move." Owning dogs was less complicated: "You don't get the feeling you're hurting their feelings all the time."

His romantic anxieties were full-spectrum, every bit of the mechanics individually examined. He told me a joke:

What does a writer say after sex?

Was it as good for me as it was for you?

"There is, in writing, a certain blend of sincerity and manipulation, of trying always to gauge what the particular effect of something is gonna be," he said. "It's a very precious asset that really needs to be turned off sometimes. My guess is that writers probably make fun, skilled, satisfactory, and seemingly considerate partners for other people. But that the experience for them is often rather lonely."

One night Wallace met the writer Elizabeth Wurtzel, whose depression memoir, Prozac Nation, had recently been published. She thought he looked scruffy — jeans and the bandanna — and very smart. Another night, Wallace walked her home from a restaurant, sat with her in her lobby, spent some time trying to talk his way upstairs. It charmed Wurtzel: "You know, he might have had this enormous brain, but at the end of the day, he still was a guy."

Wallace and Wurtzel didn't really talk about the personal experience they had in common — depression, a substance history, consultations at McLean — but about their profession, about what to do with fame. Wallace, again, had set impossible standards for himself. "It really disturbed him, the possibility that success could taint you," she recalls. "He was very interested in purity, in the idea of authenticity — the way some people are into the idea of being cool. He had keeping it real down to a science."

When Wallace wrote her, he was still curling through the same topic. "I go through a loop in which I notice all the ways I am self-centered and careerist and not true to standards and values that transcend my own petty interests, and feel like I'm not one of the good ones. But then I countenance the fact that at least here I am worrying about it, noticing all the ways I fall short of integrity, and I imagine that maybe people without any integrity at all don't notice or worry about it; so then I feel better about myself. It's all very confusing. I think I'm very honest and candid, but I'm also proud of how honest and candid I am — so where does that put me?"

Success can be as difficult to recover from as failure. "You know the tic big-league pitchers have," his mother says, "when they know that they've pitched a marvelous game — but gee, can they do it again, so they keep flexing that arm? There was some of that. Where he said, 'OK. Good, that came out well. But can I do it again?' That was the feeling I got. There was always the shadow waiting."

Wallace saw it that way too. "My big worry," he said, "is that this will just up my expectations for myself. And expectations are a very fine line. Up to a certain point they can be motivating, can be kind of a flamethrower held to your ass. Past that point they're toxic and paralyzing. I'm scared that I'll fuck up and plunge into a compressed version of what I went through before."

Mark Costello was also worried. "Work got very hard. He didn't get these gifts from God anymore, he didn't get these six-week periods where he got exactly the 120 pages he needed. So he found distraction in other places." He would get engaged, then unengaged. He would call friends: "Next weekend, Saturday, you gotta be in Rochester, Minnesota, I'm getting married." But then it would be Sunday, or the next week, and he'd have called it off.

"He almost got married a few times," Amy says. "I think what ultimately happened is he was doing it more for the other person than himself. And he realized that wasn't doing the other person any favors."

Wallace told Costello about a woman he had become involved with. "He said, 'She gets mad at me because I never want to leave the house.' 'Honey, let's go to the mall.' 'No, I want to write.' 'But you never do write.' 'But I don't know if I'm going to write. So I have to be here in case it happens.' This went on for years."

In 2000, Wallace wrote a letter to his friend Evan Wright, a Rolling Stone contributor: "I know about still having trouble with relationships. (Boy oh boy, do I.) But coming to enjoy my own company more and more — most of the time. I know about some darkness every day (and some days, it's all dark for me)." He wrote about meeting a woman, having things move too easily, deciding against it. "I think whatever the pull is for me is largely composed of wanting the Big Yes, of wanting someone else to want you (Cheap Trick lives). . . . So now I don't know what to do. Probably nothing, which seems to be the Sign that the universe or its CEO is sending me."

In the summer of 2001, Wallace relocated to Claremont, California, to become the Roy Edward Disney Chair in Creative Writing, at Pomona College. He published stories and essays, but was having trouble with his work. After he reported on John McCain's 2000 presidential campaign for this magazine, he wrote his agent that it would show his editor that "I'm still capable of good work (my own insecurities, I know)."

Wallace had received a MacArthur "genius" award in 1997. "I don't think it did him any favors," says Franzen. "It conferred the mantle of 'genius' on him, which he had of course craved and sought and thought was his due. But I think he felt, 'Now I have to be even smarter.' " In late 2001, Costello called Wallace. "He was talking about how hard the writing was. And I said, lightheartedly, 'Dave, you're a genius.' Meaning, people aren't going to forget about you. You're not going to wind up in a Wendy's. He said, 'All that makes me think is that I've fooled you, too.'"

Wallace met Karen Green a few months after moving to Claremont. Green, a painter, admired David's work. It was a sort of artistic exchange, an inter-disciplinary blind date. "She wanted to do some paintings based on some of David's stories," his mother says. "They had a mutual friend, and she thought she would ask permission."

"He was totally gaga," Wright recalls. "He called, head over heels, he was talking about her as a life-changing event." Franzen met Green the following year. "I felt in about three minutes that he'd finally found somebody who was up to the task of living with Dave. She's beautiful, incredibly strong, and a real grown-up — she had a center that was not about landing the genius Dave Wallace."

They made their debut as a couple with Wallace's parents in July 2003, attending the Maine culinary festival that would provide the title for his last book, Consider the Lobster. "They were both so quick," his father says. "They would get things and look at each other and laugh, without having to say what had struck them as funny." The next year, Wallace and Green flew to his parents' home in Illinois, where they were married two days after Christmas. It was a surprise wedding. David told his mother he wanted to take the family to what he called a "high-gussy" lunch. Sally Wallace assumed it was Karen's influence. "David does not do high gussy," she says. "His notion of high gussy is maybe long pants instead of shorts or a T-shirt with two holes instead of 18." Green and Wallace left the house early to "run errands," while Amy figured out a pretext to get their parents to the courthouse on the way to the lunch. "We went upstairs," Sally says, "and saw Karen with a bouquet, and David dressed up with a flower in his buttonhole, and we knew. He just looked so happy, just radiating happiness." Their reception was at an Urbana restaurant. "As we left in the snow," Sally says, "David and Karen were walking away from us. He wanted us to take pictures, and Jim did. David was jumping in the air and clicking his heels. That became the wedding announcement."

According to Wallace's family and friends, the last six years — until the final one — were the best of his life. The marriage was happy, university life good, Karen and David had two dogs, Warner and Bella, they bought a lovely house. "Dave in a real house," Franzen says, laughing, "with real furniture and real style."

To Franzen's eye, he was watching Wallace grow up. There had been in David a kind of purposeful avoidance of the normal. Once, they'd gone to a literary party in the city. They walked in the front door together, but by the time Franzen got to the kitchen, he realized Wallace had disappeared. "I went back and proceeded to search the whole place," Franzen recalled. "He had walked into the bathroom to lose me, then turned on his heels and walked right back out the front door."

Now, that sort of thing had stopped. "He had reason to hope," Franzen said. "He had the resources to be more grown-up, a wholer person."

And then there were the dogs. "He had a predilection for dogs who'd been abused, and unlikely to find other owners who were going to be patient enough for them," Franzen says. "Whether through a sense of identification or sympathy, he had a very hard time disciplining them. But you couldn't see his attentiveness to the dogs without getting a lump in your throat."

Because Wallace was secure, he began to talk about going off Nardil, the antidepressant he had taken for nearly two decades. The drug had a long list of side effects, including the potential of very high blood pressure. "It had been a fixture of my morbid fear about Dave — that he would not last all that long, with the wear and tear on his heart," Franzen says. "I worried that I was going to lose him in his early 50s." Costello said that Wallace complained the drug made him feel "filtered." "He said, 'I don't want to be on this stuff for the rest of my life.' He wanted to be more a member of the human race."

In June of 2007, Wallace and Green were at an Indian restaurant with David's parents in Claremont. David suddenly felt very sick — intense stomach pains. They stayed with him for days. When he went to doctors, he was told that something he'd eaten might have interacted with the Nardil. They suggested he try going off the drug and seeing if another approach might work.

"So at that point," says his sister Amy, with an edge in her voice, it was determined, 'Oh, well, gosh, we've made so much pharmaceutical progress in the last two decades that I'm sure we can find something that can knock out that pesky depression without all these side effects.' They had no idea that it was the only thing that was keeping him alive."

Wallace would have to taper off the old drug and then taper on to a new one. "He knew it was going to be rough," says Franzen. "But he was feeling like he could finally afford a year to do the job. He figured that he was going to go on to something else, at least temporarily. He was a perfectionist, you know? He wanted to be perfect, and taking Nardil was not perfect."

That summer, David began to phase out the Nardil. His doctors began prescribing other medications, none of which seemed to help. "They could find nothing," his mother says softly. "Nothing." In September, David asked Amy to forgo her annual fall-break visit. He wasn't up to it. By October, his symptoms had become bad enough to send him to the hospital. His parents didn't know what to do. "I started worrying about that," Sally says, "but then it seemed OK." He began to drop weight. By that fall, he looked like a college kid again: longish hair, eyes intense, as if he had just stepped out of an Amherst classroom.

When Amy talked to him on the phone, "sometimes he was his old self," she says. "The worst question you could ask David in the last year was 'how are you?' And it's almost impossible to have a conversation with someone you don't see regularly without that question." Wallace was very honest with her. He'd answer, "I'm not all right. I'm trying to be, but I'm not all right."

Despite his struggle, Wallace managed to keep teaching. He was dedicated to his students: He would write six pages of comments to a short story, joke with his class, fight them to try harder. During office hours, if there was a grammar question he couldn't answer, he'd phone his mother. "He would call me and say, 'Mom, I've got this student right here. Explain to me one more time why this is wrong.' You could hear the student sort of laughing in the background. 'Here's David Foster Wallace calling his mother.' "

In early May, at the end of the school year, he sat down with some graduating seniors from his fiction class at a nearby cafe. Wallace answered their jittery writer's-future questions. "He got choked up at the end," recalls Bennett Sims, one of his students. "He started to tell us how much he would miss us, and he began to cry. And because I had never seen Dave cry, I thought he was just joking. Then, awfully, he sniffled and said, 'Go ahead and laugh — here I am crying — but I really am going to miss all of you.' "

His parents were scheduled to visit the next month. In June, when Sally spoke with her son, he said, "I can't wait, it'll be wonderful, we'll have big fun." The next day, he called and said, "Mom, I have two favors to ask you. Would you please not come?" She said OK. Then Wallace asked, "Would your feelings not be hurt?"

No medications had worked; the depression wouldn't lift. "After this year of absolute hell for David," Sally says, "they decided to go back to the Nardil." The doctors also administered 12 courses of electroconvulsive therapy, waiting for Wallace's medication to become effective. "Twelve," Sally repeats. "Such brutal treatments," Jim says. "It was clear then things were bad."
Wallace had always been terrified of shock therapy. "It scares the shit out of me," he told me in 1996. "My brain's what I've got. But I could see that at a certain point, you might beg for it."

In late June, Franzen, who was in Berlin, grew worried. "I actually woke up one night," he says. "Our communications had a rhythm, and I thought, 'It's been too long since I heard from Dave.' " When Franzen called, Karen said to come immediately: David had tried to kill himself.

Franzen spent a week with Wallace in July. David had dropped 70 pounds in a year. "He was thinner than I'd ever seen him. There was a look in his eyes: terrified, terribly sad, and far away. Still, he was fun to be with, even at 10 percent strength." Franzen would sit with Wallace in the living room and play with the dogs, or step outside with David while he smoked a cigarette. "We argued about stuff. He was doing his usual line about, 'A dog's mouth is practically a disinfectant, it's so clean. Not like human saliva, dog saliva is marvelously germ-resistant.'" Before he left, Wallace thanked him for coming. "I felt grateful that he allowed me to be there," Franzen says.

Six weeks later, Wallace asked his parents to come to California. The Nardil wasn't working. It can happen with an antidepressant; a patient goes off, returns, and the medication has lost its efficacy. Wallace couldn't sleep. He was afraid to leave the house. He asked, "What if I meet one of my students?" "He didn't want anyone to see him the way he was," his father says. "It was just awful to see. If a student saw him, they would have put their arms around him and hugged him, I'm sure."

His parents stayed for 10 days. "He was just desperate," his mother says. "He was afraid it wasn't ever going to work. He was suffering. We just kept holding him, saying if he could just hang on, it would straighten. He was very brave for a very long time."

Wallace and his parents would get up at six in the morning and walk the dogs. They watched DVDs of The Wire, talked. Sally cooked David's favorite dishes, heavy comfort foods — pot pies, casseroles, strawberries in cream. "We kept telling him we were so glad he was alive," his mother recalls. "But my feeling is that, even then, he was leaving the planet. He just couldn't take it."

One afternoon before they left, David was very upset. His mother sat on the floor beside him. "I just rubbed his arm. He said he was glad I was his mom. I told him it was an honor."

At the end of August, Franzen called. All summer long he had been telling David that as bad as things were, they were going to be better, and then he'd be better than he'd ever been. David would say, "Keep talking like that — it's helping." But this time it wasn't helping. "He was far away," Franzen says. A few weeks later, Karen left David alone with the dogs for a few hours. When she came home that night, he had hanged himself.

"I can't get the image out of my head," his sister says. "David and his dogs, and it's dark. I'm sure he kissed them on the mouth, and told them he was sorry."

[From Issue 1064 — October 30, 2008]

 6 ) 就這樣錯過了2015年最好的電影

如果是在上映的 2015 年看到的《旅行終點》,我會毫不猶豫把它排在這一年所有電影中的第一名。

事實上,即使隔了一年,我也等了很久才鼓起勇氣面對它。猶豫可能來自一早得知的結(jié)局——大衛(wèi)·福斯特·華萊士,這個時代最有才華的作家之一,在 2008 年 9 月 12 日選擇以自縊的方式離開世界?!堵眯薪K點》的開頭,便是杰西·艾森伯格飾演的另外一位作家,曾經(jīng)采訪過華萊士的大衛(wèi)·利普斯基——又一個大衛(wèi)——得知華萊士去世的消息,帶著難以置信的沉痛表情,在電臺里閱讀他的作品,重新找出當(dāng)年的采訪錄音,回憶起那段短短數(shù)日的旅程。

沒有太復(fù)雜的情節(jié),不過是一位剛剛進(jìn)入《滾石》工作的年輕作家,突然聽到某一位同行被媒體高度贊譽,“明年的各項圖書獎都非他莫屬了”。他找來那本1000頁《無盡的玩笑》,想要親自驗證這一切,結(jié)果發(fā)現(xiàn)這個第一次聽說名字的作者真的如此才華橫溢,于是決定去采訪他。電影便是整段采訪的過程,大衛(wèi)·利普斯基來到大衛(wèi)·福斯特·華萊士的家,陪他去圖書簽售的最后一站,兩個大衛(wèi)在華萊士的家里,學(xué)校,路上,明尼蘇達(dá)州的旅館、書店,一路的對話。

兩個人的聊天很容易變得枯燥或無趣。雖然理查德·林克萊特在他的“愛在”三部曲里給出過正面的示范,但對話的對象換成兩個男人,并且沒有愛情的起承轉(zhuǎn)合,討論的話題還是寫作、靈感、抑郁、上癮等等并不那么輕松的話題,會認(rèn)為它好看的前提,一定是愿意敞開內(nèi)心的某扇門,通往某些一直隱匿于暗處的灰暗的念想。在采訪的一開始,華萊士聊到他名氣為他帶來的變化,和更多女孩兒們上床的可能,卻又讓自己感覺像是出來賣的婊子。而在去往簽書會的航班上,他第一次談及曾經(jīng)的抑郁,28 歲那年,迷失在寫作里,那是他唯一能夠獲得動力的事情,開始酗酒,和陌生人上床,感覺生活在這一年戛然而止。然后看著另外一位更年輕的大衛(wèi),回到當(dāng)下的生活,他說," David, this is nice. This is not real. "

這其實不僅僅是講述作家以及困擾他的抑郁的電影。從簽書會回來,在經(jīng)歷了一次因誤會產(chǎn)生的冷戰(zhàn)以及關(guān)于海洛因的尖銳爭論之后,華萊士來到利普斯基的房間,終于,撕開了內(nèi)心的某道口子,說自己書里寫過的一段,一個人從燃燒的摩天大樓躍下時,是因為在更糟糕的選擇面前,死亡成了一種解脫。他說感覺一生中聽過的每一句話都是錯的,自己什么都不是,一切不過是場幻覺。你比別人優(yōu)秀,因為你已然看穿,你也比別人糟糕,因為你已經(jīng)沒辦法正常生活。他說他覺得人是不會變的,那些東西仍舊埋藏在自己的身體內(nèi)。

大衛(wèi)·利普斯基躺在床上,眼睛里有什么東西在閃動,我想那是因為我同樣感受到的某種刺痛。

“說到根本,華萊士的所有小說寫的應(yīng)該都是這種痛苦。這位早逝的天才作家還曾經(jīng)說過:小說的作用,就是告訴讀者,身為人這種動物,到底是他媽的一種什么滋味兒?!比A萊士的作品中文版不多,此前只有過一本短篇小說集《遺忘》和演講錄《生命中最簡單又最困難的事》,《無盡的玩笑》簡體中文本已經(jīng)翻譯完畢,將于明年出版。上面這段引用,來自書評人比目魚《刻小說的人》中關(guān)于華萊士的一篇。

利普斯基在 2010 年出版了 Although Of Course You End Up Becoming Yourself: A Road Trip with David Foster Wallace ,登上了紐約時報暢銷書榜,《旅行終點》便來自這本書的改編,在去年也入選了包括《紐約時報》在內(nèi)的許多媒體的年度最佳電影片單。在兩位大衛(wèi)的作用下,這部電影試著用一段旅程去講述他們對于名利,對于生死,對于生命的看法和追求。華萊士選擇了“不那么糟糕”的死亡,利普斯基滾落的眼淚,卻是一種懂得。

電影里,利普斯基猶豫了很久,最后還是把自己的小說 The Art Fair 遞給了華萊士,希望得到他的評價,但并沒能如愿。結(jié)尾時,他在自己的分享會上讀起這本非虛構(gòu)作品的一段,說,當(dāng)我想起這段旅程,大衛(wèi)和我坐在他車子的前排,我們都如此年輕,他想要的是比現(xiàn)在擁有的更好的東西,我想要的則是他已經(jīng)擁有的這些。我們都不知道各自的生活將去往何處,空氣中有一股嚼煙葉、可樂、香煙的味道,那些對話是我有過的最棒的對話。大衛(wèi)認(rèn)為書的存在是讓人忘記孤獨,如果可以,我會對他說,那些和他在一起的日子,并沒有讓我從生活中解脫,而是提醒了我生活應(yīng)該是什么樣子,我會告訴他,那讓我感覺不那么孤獨了。

鏡頭留給了正在歡快地跳舞的華萊士,無憂無慮,像個孩子。但你會知道,有些東西,確實從來不曾變過。死亡或許是某種意義上的終點,但它也有更深沉的意義,提醒著我們生命的目的,為此做出的選擇,尚未滿足的欲望,以及如何了解自己,知道我來過這個世界,我逗留于此是為了什么。

 短評

"We are both so young. He wants something better than he has. I want precisely what he has already. Neither of us knows where our lives are going to go. It smells like chewing tobacco, soda and smoke."

4分鐘前
  • 蜉蝣
  • 推薦

★★★☆不錯的話癆片,這樣的片子只要遵循對白出色,能催發(fā)角色之間的化學(xué)反應(yīng)并適當(dāng)推動情節(jié)就能及格。卷毛演誰都還是卷毛,神經(jīng)質(zhì)語速快眼神閃爍表情尷尬,這讓席格爾的表演有一種壓倒性的出色和可信。說到David F Wallace,很久前想看oblivion和infinite jest,一直沒動手,看完電影后是真的好奇了

6分鐘前
  • headradio
  • 推薦

很喜歡這樣的話嘮片,不過很多句子翻譯成中文也會失去那種會心一擊的觸動。我們總是說人生而孤獨,但其實最深的孤獨往往來自于永恒的社交。我們說話,只是沒有真的說話;我們傾聽,只是沒有真的傾聽;我們相信,只是沒有真的相信。關(guān)掉影片的那一刻,忽然就想哭了。福斯特說,我感覺我的人生在28歲戛然而止。我的28歲有一半時間活在被疫情困住的愚人節(jié)玩笑里。

11分鐘前
  • 某J。624
  • 還行

讓人想到林克萊特的幾部話嘮片。兩個作家絮絮叨叨的邊走邊聊,充滿深度的對話就像時斷時續(xù)的水流,既有尖銳試探又有理解包容。一直覺得卷毛是那種和男星對戲才更有火花的演員~

14分鐘前
  • 同志亦凡人中文站
  • 推薦

最讓你恐懼的是,你感到你能聽懂他說的每句話,你們確鑿無疑是同類,經(jīng)歷過同樣的痛苦,有過同樣的希望。然而他卻死了。死于自殺。你還要發(fā)現(xiàn)多少次這樣失敗的證明?你還剩多少次機(jī)會證明前無后路,后不見歸途?

18分鐘前
  • Touma
  • 力薦

聚焦?jié)L石記者對作家Wallace的跟蹤采訪。本以為會很悶,但通過兩人對話,完成對Wallace的內(nèi)心剖析到主角的自身映射,進(jìn)而促成兩人關(guān)系的微妙發(fā)展,竟頗有吸引力,每個對話每段沖突都值得細(xì)品。當(dāng)然電影精彩的核心還是Jason Segel對自卑又自我,自閉又渴望陪伴的孤獨作家的傳神演繹,極具突破,深入人心

20分鐘前
  • ballsirius
  • 推薦

3.5 整體不如前作,不過仍然有例如酗酒例如成功與失敗等元素和主題,且仍然很善于給電影一個完整且動人的情緒,于是又感同身受了一回。下一部是導(dǎo)演自己編劇的科幻驚悚題材,很期待。

21分鐘前
  • 陀螺凡達(dá)可
  • 推薦

you're so much better than everybody cause you can see how this is just a delusion and you're so much worse because you can't fucking function...it's really horrible.

23分鐘前
  • 推薦

情節(jié)對話據(jù)說基本很忠實錄音內(nèi)容,雞湯不雞湯的作為一部大眾名人電影做的已經(jīng)足夠好了,真實的Literary上的華萊士,就像Jesse片中女友說的得自個兒讀才行。Wallace說電視機(jī)是他最大的addiction,但即便是這種高度簡單化即時娛樂化的影像作品,晚場電影院里也只有四個人觀看

26分鐘前
  • Ziggy
  • 力薦

讓我難過一會,"This idea that if i could just achieve X and Y and Z, that everything would be okay. "

28分鐘前
  • Muli
  • 力薦

話嘮電影,米國文化人物,也許米國人挺喜歡,但無關(guān)人物與劇情,只有對一個米國作家的素描而已。閑的撓墻的人可以看,大家請躲。

29分鐘前
  • burble
  • 很差

滾石記者和大衛(wèi)·華萊士的公路之旅,這種純話嘮缺劇情的電影真需要倚仗對話的智慧,好在劇本好!相信不僅有原著的功勞,改編者也厲害,編劇好像是個教授... 本是兩個作家的對話,卻完全不掉書袋,從很普通人的角度入手,慢慢深入。不過華萊士在自殺前的心境,應(yīng)該和當(dāng)時有很大不同吧。

32分鐘前
  • 米粒
  • 推薦

感覺可以作為“如何寫機(jī)智而自然的人物對話”的教學(xué)材料。

35分鐘前
  • \t^h/
  • 還行

片子以對白主導(dǎo),兩個男人的聊天大多數(shù)時間很隨意,但你一不小心就會被一些小細(xì)節(jié)擊中,比如暗示大衛(wèi)·華萊士抑郁癥的地方,比如人生的孤獨,漫不經(jīng)心的對話,仔細(xì)去聽了,就很容易感同身受。有些人在生命中雖然只有短暫的交集,但在相交的那個點上,他們知道那一刻彼此不是孤獨的。★★★

40分鐘前
  • 褻瀆電影
  • 還行

補標(biāo)。wallace的孤獨和坦白我深深理解,他對生活的悲觀見解更是見微知著。畢竟站在長路終點回望,一切都只是無盡的玩笑。

44分鐘前
  • Lycidas
  • 推薦

讓人很emotional的一部電影抽煙喝酒聊天寫作閱讀………但愿能夠存在于自己的另一個平行宇宙里現(xiàn)實中 沒有選擇

45分鐘前
  • 必勝
  • 力薦

那首big ship真是贊

49分鐘前
  • 古怪因子
  • 還行

紀(jì)德說:“你永遠(yuǎn)也不會了解,為了讓自己對生活產(chǎn)生興趣,我們付出了多大努力”。短暫的交集卻奇妙地揭露出了福斯特的孤獨,對人生虛無的恐懼,對生活的不安。對話漫長瑣碎,但那些突然乍現(xiàn)的真誠是會讓人感動深受而不禁黯然的。福斯特曾有演講關(guān)于面對瑣碎生活,關(guān)于面對人生,他最終選擇另一條路。

50分鐘前
  • 真是好大一張床
  • 推薦

David說“You feel like you are so much better than everyone else because you see that all these are delusions. You feel you are so much worse than everyone because you can't fucking function.” 之后腦中一直在回放。再聽到他說"I've exhausted all the ways of living." 哭了。

53分鐘前
  • fugue
  • 力薦

這部電影有意思的是采訪者和被采訪者的關(guān)系:記者覺得自己也是個作家,一直表現(xiàn)出一種不同,而被采訪者當(dāng)然會忍不住的表演,這種關(guān)系某種時刻很和諧因為是虛假的。而真實的情況是:雙方根本不可能平等。這種虛假被戳穿的時候,是這部電影最好看的一刻。

58分鐘前
  • 蕎麥
  • 推薦

返回首頁返回頂部

Copyright ? 2024 All Rights Reserved