1980年代初的北愛爾蘭,美國律師保羅和未婚妻英格麗德等人組成的公民自由聯(lián)盟組織的一個小組,來到貝爾法斯特,調(diào)查那里有沒有發(fā)生過踐踏公民權(quán)利的行為。記者招待會上,特里薩提供了英國政府實行“槍殺政策”的生動證據(jù)。哈里斯偷偷地塞給保羅一盤錄音帶。保羅乘著莫洛伊駕駛的汽車去見哈里斯,半路上遭到攔截,兩人被開槍打死。英國刑事調(diào)查局視察員克里根調(diào)查此案。英格麗德從保羅的遺物中發(fā)現(xiàn)了錄音帶空盒子,主動擔(dān)任克里根的助手。莫洛伊太太的房子被人搜查過,丈夫裝錄音帶的盒子全部被移動過。在莫洛伊家,英格麗德從照片上認(rèn)出了哈里斯——原來他是警察局特別科的人。通過特里薩,他們見到哈里斯。原來盒錄音帶是針對英國高層人士陰謀的證據(jù)——陰謀的策化者是美國中央情報局。陰謀旨在誹謗英國前首相哈羅德·威爾遜是蘇聯(lián)克格勃的傀儡,搞垮希思政府。哈里斯盼望把這份材料公開出去??死锔芰_伯特·尼爾爵士召見,警告他不要擴(kuò)大事態(tài)。英格麗德去見哈里斯后,哈里斯就被捕了。英格麗德見到克里根,克里根堅決拒絕介入。英格麗德沒有泄露她已拿到了錄音帶……
Ken Loach’s controversial Cannes entry in 1990, which won him the Jury Prize, HIDDEN AGENDA is a faction political thriller sets in apowder kegBelfast during theNorthern Ireland Troubles.
An American civil rights lawyer Paul Sullivan (Dourif) is crassly murdered along with a Provisional IRA sympathizer by British security force en route to a covert meeting with his secret source, a mysterious Captain Harris (Ro?ves). Paul’s aggrieved girlfriend and colleague, Ingrid Jessner (McDormand), remains in Belfast to seek out the truth, and soon is assisted by the righteous police detective Peter Kerrigan (Cox), designated by the Great Britain to lead the investigation.
Congruent with Loach’s rigid, anti-sensational stock-in-trade, HIDDEN AGENDA is, paraphrasing its closing quote from James Miller, a former MI5 agent, "like the layers of an onion, the more you peel them away, the more you feel like crying”, a somber police procedural strenuously resorting in verbal sparring to piece together the jigsaw of a conspiracy theory which implicates some insidious maneuvers from UK's Conservative party with regard to Margaret Thatcher’s rise to power, then poignantly shades into a hammer blow to those who uphold an idealist view on political subterfuges. At least for once, it is not the usual suspects of IRA who are in the receiving end of the diatribe, but the whole rotten democratic polity of the Great Britain, iniquity operated by the powers that be and they are not ashamed, because they cannot be touched. In Loach’s all-fired persistence, the reveal (not so shocking to those who are world-weary or cynical), resounds with a cauldron of self-defeat, angst, exasperation and disillusionment.
As a pacy thriller, Loach circumspectly orchestrates a fringe approach to downplay all the suspense usually default in the genre (no bombastic car-chasing, fistfight or firefight). The truth-seeking process is intriguingly hard-hitting and hardly impeded by any red herrings or devious plotting (a secret tape is the McGuffin),the resistance is brazenly from the bureaucratic backscratching among top brass by way of face-to-face hectoring (a bumptious Jim Norton is a standout among the squadron of supporting players as the head of the constabulary Mr. Brodie) and Brian Cox is redoubtable as a stout rock refusing to budge from mounting pressure, which makes his powerlessness and concession all the more telling in the coda. Yet, in a pivotal scene with Harris, one can manifestly sense his contempt for the latter, whom he summarily deems as a traitor seeking refuge from IRA, no one can conduct disinterestedly where hardened bias and congenital patriotism can penetrate through one’s head as easy as falling off a log.
Kerrigan's astute ambiguity is refracted by Frances McDormand’s impassioned performance as Ingrid, who is at once ingenuous and intrepid, and doesn’t succumb the disheartening reality check solely because she is an outsider, she has nothing else to lose in the purgatory besides her own life, but the film comes to a halt when Kerrigan retreats back from his mission, Loach doesn’t want a feel-good deus ex-machina to sabotage his scrutinizing endeavor (otherwise, in a lesser hand, it would be very possible to deploy a secret-recording from Kerrigan of his confab with two high-rank accomplices to turn the table in the eleventh hour), because he doesn’t need his films to please everyone, HIDDEN AGENDA is a provocation, but an intelligent one, Mr. Loach masterfully forces us to face a most inconvenient truth with his highly matter-of-fact modality, and its repercussions are here to stay.
referential points: Ken Loach’s KES (1969, 8.3/10), THE WIND THAT SHAKES THE BARLEY (2006, 7.2/10).
肯大爺就是質(zhì)量保證,也是風(fēng)格保證。
zk
國外關(guān)于政治的陰謀論比較有趣,尤其是本片針對大英和北愛的;對抗強權(quán)亦或是對抗恐怖,孰分對錯?
雖然被政府打壓仍把電影拍了出來,勇氣可加,佩服!
這不關(guān)乎法律,這是政治??死锔臒o奈和英格麗的失控的理想主義在最后都化為無力,對政治和現(xiàn)實的返照意義最后并沒有形成批判,反而形成了一種嘲諷。考克斯的表演值得一看。
諜影重重在北愛。
Emmmm 感覺劇本弱了點 整個看下來覺得可以被推敲的地方太多了
肯洛奇第一次碰愛爾蘭分離題材,除了材料組織細(xì)密論辯坦然這些政治片常見的優(yōu)點,通篇有種左翼式的柔軟平和,比如政治聚會時彈唱之際隨意的給下面靜靜應(yīng)和的觀眾一個鏡頭,還有給女秘書竊笑的那個鏡頭,抒情并且寫實。90年代電影工業(yè)和洛奇結(jié)合的結(jié)果是精致性似乎比他后來的片子好,整體有種無力感
現(xiàn)實中的「無解」是Loach一貫的重要內(nèi)核。他像拍平凡人一樣拍專業(yè)演員,最後把弔詭的無疾而終拍出來。點題特別厲害,因為真是hidden
從今天開始專攻肯洛奇……希望期末論文不要砸……肯洛奇用現(xiàn)實主義的手法拍了一部偵探、犯罪類型片,攝影簡單平實,沒有黑色電影慣有的風(fēng)格化和表現(xiàn)主義處理,謀殺、動作場面克制,大量的文戲(尖銳而直露的對于民族及民主法治問題的論戰(zhàn))??下迤娴淖笠響B(tài)度非常鮮明,對愛爾蘭共和軍也表現(xiàn)出相當(dāng)程度的同情(雖然也進(jìn)行了某種沖淡和調(diào)和,電影的敘事重心從前段的愛爾蘭獨立轉(zhuǎn)向后段的保守黨陰謀論多少也表現(xiàn)出一種導(dǎo)演第一次面對愛爾蘭問題時的審慎)。
? And you dare call me a terrorist while you look down your gun / When I think of all the deeds that you have done / You have plundered many nations, divided many lands / You have terrorized their people, you've ruled with an iron hand / And you've brought this reign of terror to my land ?
關(guān)于八十年代的北愛爾蘭的電影,充斥著當(dāng)年獨特的政治氣氛和無形的壓迫,電影全程都沒什么特別大的起伏點,但有幾場的對話非常值得回味.
肯洛奇經(jīng)歷事業(yè)沉浮后憑這部政治驚悚重回視野還是很聰明的,有美國明星助陣,也有腦洞很大的陰謀故事,跟加華斯在南美那些有點像反正美國人都是難逃干系... 沒想到吉姆艾倫還能寫這種劇本,跟以前看的講罷工的真的很不一樣,但還是從“保守黨的陷害導(dǎo)致工黨失勢”這段看出絕對是他寫的...
7.2,肯羅奇早期作品,北愛的自由與民主VS英國的政治黑幕,不過科恩老婆那典型美國南方婦女長相實在顯得太傻大姐了
拍得太波瀾不驚了!
關(guān)于北愛爾蘭的電影,大多是這樣的吧,總是政治意義大過本身。氣氛節(jié)奏算是比較合適,只是沒什么特別突出的地方。幾場對手戲還不錯。
肯洛奇的左翼政治片,充滿了無奈
抱著對北愛的私心,肯洛奇把自己的政治觀點包裝在商業(yè)化的偵探類型片中。調(diào)查的過程直白地有些天真,不難看但也談不上絲絲入扣。雖然其中有關(guān)于民主政治中理想與妥協(xié)的討論,但也是草草略過,如同討巧的美國人視角,聰明反被聰明誤?!?/10】
北愛爾蘭的典型陰謀論,政治意義可能大于電影意義?
皮老師的Assignment不好啃