藍(lán)色的大塊頭就是個(gè)Jb活該被地球人抓，尼瑪最不要臉的是被抓了還要來怪被他趕走的人，講他沒有幫助他，尼瑪是你喊人家滾的，我怕人家還要死皮賴臉的扒到你，幫助你哦。尼瑪你以為你是那個(gè)哦，人家擔(dān)心你的安全，你還一臉不在乎，瞧不起人家，尼瑪要是沒得他你早就死了幾百八十回了，還裘皮人家只是坐在控制室里面按一按。只有蠻力得Sb，活該被地球人抓，還去救他搞毛按，尼瑪讓他死在那點(diǎn)一了白了。尼瑪看到他都讓人作嘔，惡心得要命。自大狂一個(gè)，就該為自己的行為付出代價(jià)。還要那個(gè)家兒子也是個(gè)sb，盲目崇拜，不尊重自己父親，自己手廢，闖了貨還不敢承認(rèn)，他那個(gè)sb叔叔自己自大活該被抓還怪他爹，尼瑪你到底是那個(gè)生的哦，是你爹被他趕走的誒，尼瑪他活b該好不好。尼瑪jb sb 一大群，直接看不下去，尼瑪那個(gè)sb星球還把他當(dāng)英雄，狗屁，每次出任務(wù)，光榮都被他占了，從來都沒得人想起在背后出力的那個(gè)人，尼瑪要是沒得他那個(gè)sb早就死了好不，還嘲笑背后工作的那個(gè)人，哼，怎么會(huì)有這種星球上的人，全他媽腦袋被狗啃了，全sb。尼瑪太賤了，直接看不下去，雖然劇情很精彩，但是這種sb設(shè)定直接d討人罵，罵到一半就沒力氣看了。我操。jb！，，，，，，，

我一直都是深信外星人的存在的，在這樣一個(gè)無窮神秘的宇宙當(dāng)中，我們?nèi)祟愡@種渺小的生物憑什么說只有地球才能生存物種。

所以那些檔案中記載的各種飛碟墜落一定都和影片里面一樣，就是他們著陸失敗了，他們只是來探索這個(gè)未知的星球，dark planet。

我記得《第十放映室》里面盤點(diǎn)那些外星人電影的時(shí)候有一段話的意思是：我們不停的派飛船探索太空，向太空播放外星語希望和外星人交流。結(jié)果外星人來了，我們卻要把他們消滅。這些負(fù)面影響都是好萊塢大片帶來的。

你怎么知道外星人不是和平來訪。

我是一個(gè)很喜歡看動(dòng)畫片的人，所以這部電影無論從情節(jié)還是畫風(fēng)都只能說一般，很多地方說教意圖很明顯，后半段出來了一只嘻哈老鼠的笑點(diǎn)還是挺多的。星期五的夜晚，美國人都是拖家?guī)Э趤砜?，但是貌似只有我和我同學(xué)笑的最開心...

盡管這部電影一般，但是相比于那些坑爹的真人片，動(dòng)畫片永遠(yuǎn)都是我心中的一片凈土，一種質(zhì)量的保證。

這部動(dòng)畫片還是挺有意思的，主題比較大膽，內(nèi)容比較豐富，電影節(jié)奏也比較快，故事是站在一個(gè)全宇宙的角度上，將外星人塑造成一群人性的集體，他們有家庭，也有親情，有高傲自大和超級(jí)英雄主義，還有內(nèi)部矛盾，而恰恰又把人類描述為一群自私，貪婪，霸權(quán)主義者，他們將外星人淪為人類的奴隸，并想稱霸宇宙，而被禁錮的外星人開始團(tuán)結(jié)一致，運(yùn)用自己的頭腦和行動(dòng)，去拯救自己家園和親人。電影雖然有許多諷刺人類的成分在里面，但是還是有一定道理的，人類不停的去挖掘開采宇宙中的資源，雖然能帶動(dòng)人類前進(jìn)，但是人類的貪婪和霸氣主義只會(huì)給宇宙帶來不和諧。但畢竟還是動(dòng)畫片，主要以娛樂為主，能讓我們放松大笑就行，電影當(dāng)中還是有許多笑點(diǎn)地方，除非是我笑點(diǎn)低，哈哈。

動(dòng)畫片的質(zhì)量，平均起來總是比真人拍攝的制作要精良。該片細(xì)節(jié)、場(chǎng)景、角色性格刻畫，十分的細(xì)膩。
該片的結(jié)構(gòu)極其完整，鋪墊、深入、翻轉(zhuǎn)式的高潮，頌揚(yáng)真善美，鞭策假惡丑。標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的好萊塢娛樂美劇模式，因足夠標(biāo)準(zhǔn)，也就缺少了突破。
讓我想起我的老弟，兄弟情深，而又爭(zhēng)執(zhí)不已，互相關(guān)懷，而又常?；ハ噢揶?，呵呵，過年了，要和老弟好好喝一杯。
與家人同觀，喝點(diǎn)茶，嗑點(diǎn)瓜子，輕松快樂。

此片絕對(duì)是犯二一級(jí)棒噠片子。
劇情俗套。
製作粗糙。
除暸Jessica Alba外其他全是二流三流來混事兒噠。
眞不是我說其實(shí)挺無聊。
最值得5顆星兒噠是那三個(gè)大眼兒小外星人。
其他尤其是那個(gè)大壯塊兒藍(lán)腦袋那位。
簡(jiǎn)直是二到家暸。
711是來贊助這個(gè)片子暸麼...
整體感覺挺一般。
和甚麼怪物電力公司、甚麼美食從天降、甚麼噠差遠(yuǎn)啦。
但是小朋友看看還是可以噠。

Well, now it gets me thinking - Was it a good thing that I didn't get to see this animation in theatre during Beijing Film Festival, which, as an indeed and honest matter of fact, was one of the few films I genuinely wanted to see? Would I have liked it better if I did? Surely the outcome, visual and audio, must be much better than what I just experienced on my pc. However, I believe there's not much doubt that I may have still disliked the film, to my surprise.

Where does the "to my surprise" come from? The script of this film is the very first one in English that I ever read, thus naturally it means something to me. Plus, looking back to it now after reading dozes and varieties of them, I'd think this one isn't so bad, at least adventurous and fun. In a word, a good script. - That's exactly why my disappointment starts. - If it's really bad otherwise, we wouldn't be talking about it right now.

In my strong opinion, the performance of a script, despite literally just in words, is the very key that determines the quality of a film, since it lays the foundation, the story. Many projects start with fancy, brilliant ideas/concepts that wow crowds, yet when it comes to its script where the story is plotted and presented in details, it falls directly flat on the face. However, in the case of ESCAPE FROM PLANET EARTH, it does have a good story -an outer-space adventure that saves the universe and bonds the family closer - despite being slightly cliche. BUT, never ever in my life that I've thought that it would or could turn out like this - rushy, noisy, if not too foolish - that I didn't bother lifting the corners of my mouth to make something even closer to a smile, let alone a laugher.

Well, you can say the absence of a smile/laughter may come from my pre-knowlodge of having read the script, fair enough and I agree. However, it's not the plot or the core of the literal story that disappoints me, as I previously said it's not a bad one. But it is the the outside, the rest of the artistic creation that does the crappy job, if not annoys me heavily.

First of all, who is this animation targeting at? Kids between 5 years old to 12 years old, in other words, pupil? I have no further argument if the producers nod yes to that question, because it certainly looks that way, with mini characters which seem exactly like an alien branch of ants, and the doll-house alike settings. - If it doesn't target at that range of audience, then the art work has definitely failed enormously.

My second problem with the film is its rushy pace, which makes it super noisy. Those funny bombs I was interested in when reading the script somehow turn into mediocre gum bubbles that blow flat and sticky. Plus, I found myself being dragged headless to listening to endless rows of characters who never stop talking about nothing but nonsense, which wore me out. I'm just so confused that I want to yell out in the middle of this film, "Why the hell are you rushing breathless?" Does "rushing" mean "fast-pacing" in the dictionary of the director? Slow down and take a breath, will you?