你認(rèn)為世間存在正義，公正么？

人與人最大的共通之處是什么？empathy. 當(dāng)一個(gè)人痛苦，難過(guò)，掙扎，崩潰，憤怒，快樂(lè)的時(shí)候，另一個(gè)人是不是可以身臨其境的感受到他人的感覺(jué)．人與人之間最大的聯(lián)系，在我看來(lái)，不是種族，國(guó)家，文化，和其他背景，而是這種empathized feeling. 如果沒(méi)有這種感覺(jué)，難以想象人類的未來(lái)可以有任何希望．

看一下human trafficking的數(shù)據(jù)吧

An estimated 2.5 million people are in forced labour (including sexual exploitation) at any given time as a result of trafficking.　1.4 million – 56% - are in Asia and the Pacific.

The majority of trafficking victims are between 18 and 24 years of age

95% of victims experienced physical or sexual violence during trafficking (based on data from selected European countries)

43% of victims are used for forced commercial sexual exploitation, of whom 98 per cent are women and girls．32% of victims are used for forced economic exploitation, of whom 56 per cent are women and girls

In 2006 there were only 5,808 prosecutions and 3,160 convictions throughout the world
This means that for every 800 people trafficked, only one person was convicted in 2006.

大約2000年，一個(gè)美國(guó)的女警察被派往波斯尼亞執(zhí)行聯(lián)合國(guó)維和任務(wù)．期間他發(fā)現(xiàn)當(dāng)?shù)赜懈鞣N色情場(chǎng)所里的年輕妓女都是從西歐各國(guó)販賣來(lái)的，有的是拐賣，有的是哄騙，有的是無(wú)家可歸者，有de 是因?yàn)閼?zhàn)亂離家者．當(dāng)?shù)鼐?，政府，?lián)合國(guó)維和組織，美國(guó)政府的contractor都參與到這個(gè)流水線式的犯罪行為中．就在她搜查證據(jù)的時(shí)候，他的調(diào)查被美國(guó)政府高層正式禁止了．原因就是U.S contractor以每年幾十億的合同為代價(jià)逼迫美國(guó)政府施壓，干預(yù)調(diào)查．在烏克蘭，羅馬尼亞，捷克，白俄羅斯，波斯尼亞等等西歐國(guó)家中，這些年輕的女孩以各種手段被賣往歐洲美洲其他國(guó)家．販賣者每年可以從中收取百分之2000的利潤(rùn)．一個(gè)美國(guó)pimp可以從一個(gè)年輕妓女身上獲得＄250,000的利潤(rùn)．在這個(gè)事件中，集團(tuán)公司，美國(guó)政府，聯(lián)合國(guó)，當(dāng)?shù)鼐煺?，都成為了human trafficking的同謀者，他們當(dāng)中很多人甚至參與到買賣婦女的交易當(dāng)中．其中一個(gè)年輕女孩被人從烏克蘭拐賣到波斯尼亞，因?yàn)榇饝?yīng)為這個(gè)女警察出庭作證，被當(dāng)場(chǎng)殺害．第二天，一群冷酷的波斯尼亞警察在荒郊野外圍著這么一個(gè)被發(fā)現(xiàn)的年輕尸體，抽著香煙，若無(wú)其事的閑聊著，象看死老鼠一樣，悠閑的看著眼前這個(gè)美麗生命的驅(qū)殼．很多的年輕女孩都是這樣，先被侮辱，輪奸，性虐待，摧毀她們的精神意志，然后成為賺錢(qián)的性工具，最后被殺害或者被性虐待致死．

她把所有內(nèi)幕在英國(guó)公布于眾，沒(méi)有一個(gè)當(dāng)?shù)鼐旌吐?lián)合國(guó)官員受到應(yīng)有的起訴和懲罰．所有人只是被遣散了．那些參與其中的U.S contractor依然在伊拉克和阿富汗享受巨額合同帶來(lái)的利潤(rùn)．這個(gè)女警察現(xiàn)今依然沒(méi)有工作．．．．．此事并沒(méi)有引起媒體的軒然大波．．．

此時(shí)的我，憤怒．我喜歡這種感覺(jué)．

人與人之間如果沒(méi)有empathy, 很難想象人類可以有任何希望繼續(xù)下去．當(dāng)看到這個(gè)女孩被一群男人侮辱，性侵?jǐn)_，迫害，輪奸，殺害，你也許會(huì)感到有一些不安．當(dāng)聽(tīng)到那些聲嘶力竭的叫喊，我很難想象一個(gè)普通人竟然還可以神色安寧的喝茶吃飯！但之后呢，因?yàn)槲覀兏械綗o(wú)助，沒(méi)有能力做任何事情，所以我們便盡量的告訴自己，這是世界另一頭的事情么？這與我們的生活不相干，于是我們只能嘆氣么？于是乎，世界的這一頭，你在乏味平庸的生活著，另一邊，千百萬(wàn)的年輕生命在你無(wú)法想象的環(huán)境中摧殘著．每一個(gè)人和你一樣有感情的人，每天在經(jīng)歷著地獄一樣的生活，即使我們什么都不能做，也沒(méi)有任何借口去無(wú)視．

集團(tuán)公司和大學(xué)有一個(gè)課程或者名詞，叫"business ethics". 你真的認(rèn)為世間存在一種概念，叫business ethics么？business 真的有ethics么？business的目的只有一個(gè)，就是股東的利潤(rùn)．它所做的所有都是為了最大的增加股東的利潤(rùn)．ethics成為他們一個(gè)最道德化的理由，來(lái)讓那些消費(fèi)者覺(jué)得他們花的錢(qián)心安理得．

你覺(jué)得世間有公正和正義么？在哪里？（don't tell me its in the LAW)
這個(gè)問(wèn)題很讓人思考，但我不感興趣．因?yàn)槲也恍枰獙ふ夜驼x．
不管這世間有沒(méi)有公正和正義，我們都不需要去尋找，因?yàn)閷ふ乙馕吨覀円锌克撕屯饨纾@些價(jià)值需要自己去創(chuàng)造．這樣創(chuàng)造出來(lái)的公正和正義是屬于自己的．這樣的道德律是凌駕與法律之上的．自己的道德律可以對(duì)抗全世界．

為什么human trafficking成為現(xiàn)今成長(zhǎng)最快，利潤(rùn)最大的犯罪行為？

為什么越來(lái)越多的人成為所謂的＂現(xiàn)代奴隸主＂？特別是男人（在中國(guó)，平均四個(gè)男人中，就有一個(gè)參與性行為買賣）

為什么媒體對(duì)于這些真正涉及多放利益的問(wèn)題，拷問(wèn)倫理的重大問(wèn)題置之枉然？

如果世間沒(méi)有公正和正義，你會(huì)怎么辦？

你走的越遠(yuǎn)，走的越久，就會(huì)發(fā)現(xiàn)這世間本沒(méi)有價(jià)值，人也變得沒(méi)有意義．而為什么人要存在？存在的理由之一就是為了創(chuàng)造原本沒(méi)有，但之后屬于自己的價(jià)值．讓這些價(jià)值成為共通價(jià)值，才有希望．

這個(gè)片子告訴了我們，只要人的存在是為了欲望，那么當(dāng)他有了權(quán)力了以后就會(huì)利用自己的權(quán)力來(lái)滿足自己的欲望。
如果沒(méi)有一個(gè)國(guó)家體制來(lái)制約這種權(quán)力那么必將形成有組織的犯罪集團(tuán)。
光靠政策來(lái)說(shuō)服大眾，只是一個(gè)美麗的謊言！

制片人希望能讓觀眾受到片中那些被迫賣淫女性受到殘暴對(duì)待的鏡頭影響，所以增加了拉亞一角，來(lái)給予這些受害人一張真實(shí)的面孔。
電影首次在多倫多放映期間，一位觀眾因片中的暴力鏡頭暈倒，大部分強(qiáng)奸的鏡頭因此遭到刪減。

對(duì)此薇茲表示：
我完全理解，讓人看這些東西的確太痛苦了。
真實(shí)情況還要慘烈得多。
我的意思是，第一個(gè)接觸這些青年女性的人的故事中我能夠告訴你的還只有這個(gè)“低調(diào)”的版本，如果你能夠接受這樣的內(nèi)容。
不過(guò)，這不是紀(jì)錄片，你不希望（在里面）毀掉誰(shuí)。
你只想闡明一些事情，它的實(shí)際情況還要慘上百倍。

聯(lián)合國(guó)秘書(shū)長(zhǎng)潘基文主持了電影的一次放映，并承諾會(huì)采取措施，防止聯(lián)合國(guó)工作人員參與色情人口販賣活動(dòng)。
對(duì)此波克瓦克回應(yīng)：“不幸的是，恐懼已經(jīng)廣泛散布。糾正之路將會(huì)很復(fù)雜，并且無(wú)法速戰(zhàn)速?zèng)Q?！彼€表示，除波斯尼亞外，維和人員在尼日利亞、科索沃、布隆迪、塞拉利昂、剛果、利比里亞、柬埔寨、伊拉克、阿富汗、海地、哥倫比亞、幾內(nèi)亞和蘇丹都存在侵犯人權(quán)的行徑。
康達(dá)基對(duì)此表示自己打算保持樂(lè)觀，希望電影的放映能夠“讓人們對(duì)聯(lián)合國(guó)參與性交易人口販賣及其它犯罪活動(dòng)展開(kāi)真正的討論和思考?！钡矒?dān)心電影可能不會(huì)產(chǎn)生預(yù)期的持久影響：“我知道我們會(huì)聽(tīng)到很多說(shuō)法，說(shuō)自本片上映以來(lái)都已經(jīng)采該了哪些措施，但到目前為止這些都還只是說(shuō)辭。實(shí)際情況已經(jīng)出現(xiàn)升級(jí)。

”《告密者》在院線上映后，《衛(wèi)報(bào)》報(bào)道稱有聯(lián)合國(guó)官員試圖淡化電影中描繪的事件，并且打擊波斯尼亞境內(nèi)人口販賣的行動(dòng)已遭中止。

戴陽(yáng)國(guó)際發(fā)言人阿什利·伯克（Ashley Burke）稱：

我沒(méi)看過(guò)那部電影，所以無(wú)法對(duì)其內(nèi)容作出評(píng)價(jià)，但是我可能告訴大家，我們聯(lián)系影片發(fā)行商試圖了解電影的更多信息時(shí)得知，影片不是改編自波克瓦克女士的著作，而是是受到她經(jīng)歷啟發(fā)所做的‘虛構(gòu)戲劇化呈現(xiàn)’。我們也沒(méi)有威脅采取法律行動(dòng)來(lái)要求他們不得在片中使用公司的真實(shí)名稱。

很抱歉，以上是我轉(zhuǎn)載的內(nèi)容，我覺(jué)得這更有一定的說(shuō)服力
首先，電影里出現(xiàn)的公司名稱戴陽(yáng)國(guó)際是真實(shí)存在的，并且戴陽(yáng)國(guó)際也一直在參與聯(lián)合國(guó)的各種事物（業(yè)務(wù)），最終聯(lián)合國(guó)秘書(shū)長(zhǎng)潘也組織觀看了此片，相信會(huì)有所動(dòng)作！

但.....弱肉搶食

Talking With Kathryn Bolkovac About Her Experience as The Whistleblower

Posted: 08/16/11 07:48 PM ET

 

After seeing (and reviewing) The Whistleblower, I contacted Kathryn Bolkovac, whose story is the basis of the movie, and interviewed her. Her answers speak for themselves, but also give such a sense of her persona, grit and determination.

FOSTER: You were faced with a situation where the people you worked with were engaged in something very shocking. Do you have any insight as to how or why they got involved with trafficking?

I really do not think there is clear cut answer for this. Everyone is an individual and is accountable to their individual behavior and potential illegal actions they committed and continue to commit in current missions. I think most people are truly just plain complicit in their thinking and tend to not get involved or look the other way to avoid any form of accountability, especially if they think that something does not directly affect them for their position. Then there is the group of people who can easily be swayed to join in on a pack mentality, who are morally and mentally weak or ignorant. When conditions are right as they have been and still are in many overseas missions around the world, or if they think they will not be caught or judged then it is easy for them to engage in illegal and corrupt behavior. They try to justify and minimize their actions. Finally, there are individuals who are just plain evil and corrupt, they see the money making potential of preying on the helpless and needy, and exploit every opportunity they can to make a buck, especially in an industry that involves sex. They are very good at dehumanizing, denial, and lying about what is going on.

FOSTER: What do you think needs to be done to address the trafficking issue? What can government do?

The trafficking issue at large is too complex to tackle with sweeping reform. There are so many different types of human trafficking each with different dynamics of funding the corruption. Obviously, many adults choose to be trafficked... or illegally transported across many borders to escape horrendous conditions in their own countries. These issues cannot be convoluted with organized criminal syndicates who are providing services to internationals all over the world, in the form of trafficking for forced prostitution. They are involved in the recruitment, abuse, desensitization, and sale of human flesh, into international missions as sex workers. This is what I want to discuss and what I think we can make a huge impact on based on my experiences as a former law enforcement officer, former UN employee, former representative of our U.S. government overseas, and as a former employee of one of the largest private government contractors in the world DynCorp.

FOSTER: What can our government do?

First, in the short term, the United States needs to take a serious look at why we are willing to allow private companies to engage in the profession of law enforcement. Government contractors are a needed and viable means to get many logistical and re-construction efforts accomplished. They are not a viable means for a protection force or as a mechanism for the use in training law enforcement officers in emerging democracies. Law enforcement is not a business. Policing is a calling. Does anyone really believe that private corporations are in this policing and operational mission business for anything but the money? We need to set an example with our own federal police selection units, perhaps via the Department of Justice as an example, why can we not recruit and most importantly train our own community police officers before we send them into these missions? My book accurately describes the pathetic training offered by the private company who sent me overseas, which I am sure was heavily subsidized with my tax dollars. It was a disgrace; none of us had even the minimum knowledge or idea of what we were supposed to be doing once we got into Bosnia.

If we are to continue to send "rent a cops " overseas with inadequate knowledge and inadequate protections from corrupt private companies, some of whom had serious questionable policing backgrounds we might want to stop and think about how this damages our reputation and our goals. The private company who fired me had free reign to treat me however they saw fit, no one was in authority to stop them. They were exempt from all U.S. government accountability and have never been held accountable for what they did to me to this day. How has this changed? It has not.

Second, get the Civilian Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act (CEJA) out of committee and get it passed. It has been more than 12 years overdue. [NOTE: CEJA would allow the U.S. Justice Department to prosecute government contractors and employees for certain crimes committed overseas. It would complement the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act (MEJA), which provides similar criminal jurisdiction over Department of Defense employees and contractors but does not clearly apply to U.S. contractors working overseas for other federal agencies.]

Third, make government contractors accountable for their employee actions, by putting a clause in their contracts that require them to facilitate and allow oversight of both external and internal investigations by outside government agencies, when probable cause exists that employees are suspected, or implicated in criminal offenses. They must cooperate in the facilitation of prosecutions. They can no longer just fire people, and hope the problem goes away, which automatically curtails any further investigation.

Fourth, set examples by having the means available to prosecute and convict with meaningful sentences.

FOSTER: What can individuals do?

Learn, read, report, and stop burying your heads in the sand. Many of the people involved in these crimes could be your next door neighbor.

Get local law enforcement initiatives started, and ask your police chiefs this question. What kind of training is being offered to your new recruits and officers on the streets to recognize and investigate all forms of human trafficking?

Do you think a local police chief in the hills of Northern New Mexico, or in the farming community of southern Illinois, is even going to know what we are talking about? Does the local hotel have young female Hispanics working in the housekeeping department? They do not speak English, they have no documents, does he know what wage they are being paid and in what form? Think about it. I have been in these places have you?

 FOSTER: Many of the women and girls who are trafficked are promised jobs that don't materialize. What do you think would be effective to get the word out to them so that fewer of them fall prey to these types of promises?

The only effect we can have on this is to stop the demand.

FOSTER: How did you sustain yourself?

Continued faith in our justice system, lots of hard workouts and sweat, many tears and my husband would make me a strong gin tonic with lots of lemon and ice once in a while.
 



 

 Follow Stephenie Foster on Twitter: www.twitter.com/StephenieFoster

      剛剛看完告密者，是由木乃伊女主演的，看完很郁悶。真的有點(diǎn)像口語(yǔ)老師Paul說(shuō)的，人長(zhǎng)大了，就喜歡看深刻的電影了 。

       故事的主題是以波黑內(nèi)戰(zhàn)，聯(lián)合國(guó)維和部隊(duì)人員參與販賣人口，最后英雄女主角拯救局面的故事情節(jié)演的。剛開(kāi)始的女主，就是一心為著錢(qián)去的。當(dāng)上級(jí)軍官宣揚(yáng)著正義和平的時(shí)候，女主沒(méi)有多少投入，反而是周圍的男隊(duì)友們很亢奮。

        但是隨著剝繭抽絲的敘事過(guò)程，事實(shí)浮出了水面，之所以在這樣一個(gè)戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)國(guó)度，能有這樣多的酒吧生存下來(lái)，服務(wù)的不是本國(guó)的男士，而是維和部隊(duì)的軍官。 收容所的老奶奶說(shuō):"戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)讓我們國(guó)家的男人都死了一半，你說(shuō)這些女孩是為誰(shuí)服務(wù)的！“說(shuō)的是那么的平靜，但是我的內(nèi)心卻很波瀾。

     女主在劇中說(shuō)了這樣的話，她說(shuō)，

-- 以前在家里，我們分局有25個(gè)人，我了解他們每一個(gè)人，知道他們的一切，他們的家人。

--原本我以為是和一群精英來(lái)到這里工作，現(xiàn)在我甚至都不知道他們到底是誰(shuí)？！

       西方社會(huì)一直認(rèn)為，人之初，性本惡，原來(lái)我不這么認(rèn)為，近些年我接觸的事情使我慢慢深刻地理解了這句話的內(nèi)涵。在西方這樣一個(gè)發(fā)達(dá)，法律體制健全的社會(huì)里，每個(gè)人在這樣的體系中生活，沒(méi)有機(jī)會(huì)，也沒(méi)有理由讓你做出出乎意料的行為，至少對(duì)大部分人是這樣的。加之開(kāi)明的價(jià)值觀和先進(jìn)的的城市化進(jìn)程使得很多東西不會(huì)引起恐慌和圍觀。但是即使這樣紳士和文明的人類被放逐到薩拉熱窩這樣的動(dòng)蕩地帶，沒(méi)有法治，種族間斗毆，社會(huì)信仰的不健全。人性中那種齷齪，極端，邪惡的念頭就會(huì)被只能各種松弛的約束帶釋放出來(lái)，原來(lái)我們不敢說(shuō)的敢說(shuō)了，原來(lái)我們不敢做的敢做了。甚至變本加厲，異常極端，電影中出現(xiàn)的很多情節(jié)讓你感覺(jué)仿佛不是去酒吧找樂(lè)子，更像是對(duì)很多之前禁忌的獵奇，而無(wú)辜的女孩就成為其中的玩偶，他們的痛苦就像是反應(yīng)的結(jié)果，出現(xiàn)才是正常的，才夠滿足他們的好奇。

       經(jīng)歷了千辛萬(wàn)苦，想救出的女孩終究還是死了，當(dāng)做了殺雞儆猴中的雞，看著挺心酸，但是我覺(jué)得確實(shí)最好的結(jié)局。她所遭受的痛苦，是那種死亡可以替代的，死亡還是平靜的，折磨卻沒(méi)有止境?？赡?，我是說(shuō)可能，拯救出的她們沒(méi)有技能，沒(méi)有能力，或許還有很多又會(huì)做回老本行，但是，那種存在的尊嚴(yán)儼然可以被稱之為人?。?！這很重要~~~

整部影片幾乎都處于黑暗背景下，即使在白天，也是出于幽暗閉塞的樓體，濃霧陰暗的天氣乃至茂密的叢林中。貫穿著一股壓抑，灰敗的氣氛。
承認(rèn)是因?yàn)槟菘ㄘ愻斊娌趴吹碾娪?，但最終吸引我的不是性感女神，而單單是一個(gè)故事。
請(qǐng)?jiān)徫业臏\薄，我無(wú)法理解為什么有的人批判這部電影為題材陳舊。任何一個(gè)國(guó)家，在一部公映的影片中，刻畫(huà)一樁政治丑聞，不得不說(shuō)，這都是一種勇氣。
影片確實(shí)處處透露美國(guó)的個(gè)人英雄主義，但與大多數(shù)商業(yè)片不同的是，我認(rèn)為這不是一部單純?yōu)榱藠蕵?lè)和票房誕生出的影片。現(xiàn)代社會(huì)原本人們引以為豪的藝術(shù)越發(fā)淪為牟利的工具，電影，書(shū)，音樂(lè)，越來(lái)越趨向同一化。變得越發(fā)沒(méi)有內(nèi)涵，我看到的是利益和淺薄。批量化生產(chǎn)的熒幕英雄帶給我們的也無(wú)非是一笑置之而就此忘卻。
而在這個(gè)人們無(wú)處釋放壓力的快節(jié)奏社會(huì)里，我們不能對(duì)生活和命運(yùn)的壓抑嘶吼，無(wú)力反抗，于是依靠電影來(lái)娛樂(lè)自己釋放自己。其實(shí)很多時(shí)候我都在懷疑，是不是人們都在依靠這些虛擬的世界，依靠畫(huà)面和數(shù)字，來(lái)尋找自己，找激情，找青春，找愛(ài)，甚至于，找良知。
苦難深埋在世界各個(gè)角落，我無(wú)法做到對(duì)于這樣一樁真實(shí)發(fā)生的，且每天乃至每刻都在發(fā)生的悲劇，僅僅冠以一串?dāng)?shù)字的名頭。我有個(gè)老師教過(guò)，看電影這種事情，外行看內(nèi)容，內(nèi)行看形式。但我無(wú)法做到。我始終認(rèn)為，電影存在的意義沒(méi)有拯救靈魂那么偉大，但至少能讓我們看到世界不同的一面，讓我們有感知，有感情，在痛苦的時(shí)候能因?yàn)楦杏X(jué)到自己仍是有血有肉的人，而得到一絲慰藉。
如果電影的存在僅僅只是用來(lái)表達(dá)或紀(jì)念某些形式或拍攝手法，那么我只會(huì)覺(jué)得那是一種枯燥而毫無(wú)意義的傳承。最終會(huì)被拋棄。
是因?yàn)樯鐣?huì)顛覆了善有善報(bào)的傳統(tǒng)，于是人們變得越發(fā)麻木，我相信并非人本性冷酷，而是世界教會(huì)我們，我們犧牲了自己，卻未必能保得他人。懲惡揚(yáng)善。于是才有了明哲保身，遠(yuǎn)離是非。
在一些人冰冷的評(píng)價(jià)著每年250萬(wàn)人口被販賣時(shí)，我只能覺(jué)得是一種良知的喪失。也許我們都不是英雄，我們看到卑鄙，卻無(wú)法對(duì)抗，我們做不了女主那樣犧牲自我而護(hù)衛(wèi)良知的抉擇。從而選擇逃避，但是，仍希望在我們可以做的時(shí)候，別只覺(jué)得處在災(zāi)難中的人民，只是一串?dāng)?shù)字，就像一部電影，只是幾個(gè)演員，幾臺(tái)機(jī)器。
任何一具身體，都透露著生命的氣息，在那些女孩驚慌大叫的時(shí)候，我亦感到恐懼。作為一個(gè)導(dǎo)演，將情感傳達(dá)出來(lái)，就足夠讓我滿意。鏡頭打在 人性 這個(gè)詞上的那一刻，我忽然因?yàn)樽约旱纳屏純H僅只是給沒(méi)有飯吃的人們幾個(gè)硬幣，而自慚形穢。
英雄是存在的，但當(dāng)人們麻木時(shí)，英雄將被淹沒(méi)。
不談道德，僅僅是為了維護(hù)生而為人的良知與人性，我們需要面臨的都太多。需要付出的也太多。
作為最普通的社會(huì)一份子，我們大概時(shí)時(shí)處在一種被操控中。但仍愿相信希望，并保有對(duì)生活最基本的希望與熱忱。堅(jiān)定的走下去。