A minor Lubitsch fluff transposes No?l Coward’s eponymous play onto the celluloid (but in only bare-bones terms), DESIGN FOR LIVING is a witty but stuffy comedy hammers out an uncharacteristic denouement for a risquéthree-way relationship between two men and a woman, a progenitor of Fran?ois Truffaut’s JULES AND JIM (1962).
Three Americans in Paris, best friends and roomies, struggling artists Tom Chambers (March) and George Curtis (Cooper) both are swept off their feet by a chic girl Gilda Farrell (Hopkins), who reciprocates them with isometric amount of affection, before soon a platonic ménage-à-trois under the same roof is propounded and accepted with a tripartite agreement, only sabotaged when one party is away in London for his burgeoning playwright career, the remaining two becomes an item, occasioning a crack in two men's friendship, and a seesawing Gilda has only one exit route when she is again, impelled to make the impossible choosing, leaving both and hurriedly marries to her long-time admirer Max Plunkett (Horton, utterly jolly in his priggish, business-oriented persona), which turns out to be an exasperating mistake on her part.
It is a jocose folie-à-trois panning out like a heady and mellifluous minuet, predominantly confined itself within interior spaces, aptly conceals its hanky-panky business off the screen (released within a whisker of the advent of the notorious Hays Code), but revels in its proto-screwball faux-na?f characterization to the hilt. The trio leads are all up for it, although acting side by side, a debonair March fairly eclipses an impetuous Cooper in his sonorous diction and unperturbed demeanor, but the cynosure here is a ripsnorting Hopkins, exerts her high-wire balancing act between two emblems of idealized American masculinity and only comically falls prey of her own indecision in the slapdash third act, as a matter of fact, Lubitsch cunningly expurgates all the frills and trimmings from his camera (including a climactic brawl, vanishingly completed in a trice), less is more, this blithe rom-com once again bears witness to Lubitsh’s master-class aptitude of economic elegance under the Studio system.
companion pieces: Lubitsch’s ONE HOUR WITH YOU (1932, 7.1/10), HEAVEN CAN WAIT (1943, 7.9/10).
《愛情無計》,恩斯特?劉別謙拍于1933年的有聲片。
八十年前,劉大師就創(chuàng)作出了之后特呂弗拍攝的《祖與占》中的兩性游戲規(guī)則,但這完全是兩種不同風(fēng)格的樣式,說是三角戀亦可,說是四角戀亦然。也許五十年代的特呂弗受過其影響。
因為《愛情無計》就拍于五光十色的巴黎。兩個美國佬在巴黎共享一間房子,劇作家與畫家整天疲于奔命,日子過得狼狽不堪。一次火車上與漂亮頑皮女子的相遇,徹底改變了他倆的人生軌跡。爛泥糊上了墻頭,劇作家倫敦火爆,畫家在法國名聲鵲起,好運紛至沓來。
而好女子只有一個,且她的“監(jiān)護人”還時常過度關(guān)照?!熬訁f(xié)定”只是理性時候的產(chǎn)物。沖動是魔鬼,感情一來,什么都拋在九霄云外。風(fēng)水輪流轉(zhuǎn),先是畫家,后是劇作家,再是“監(jiān)護人”,可謂你方唱罷我登場,但好戲終有收場之時,妙不可言就在結(jié)束之期,三人又開始了盡興的美好人生,實在是余味不盡。
這是劉大師改編自英國劇作家諾埃爾·考沃德的同名舞臺劇,王爾德式的敏銳和尖酸,經(jīng)過嶄新的過濾,既保留了對上流社會悠閑階級的洞悉,又增添了都會男女的觸覺。真正的都市情感猛片,永遠(yuǎn)也不會過時,盡管她已八十歲。加里·庫柏與弗雷德里克?馬奇演到了極致。
2012、9、4
開頭的無聲戲拍的不錯;pre-code時期的電影真是前衛(wèi)?。╫r崩壞,基本上是一個睡完男二睡男一,再找備胎男三結(jié)婚,最后拋棄男三和男一男二3p的故事,no sex,first base這樣的詞都能出現(xiàn);劇本不行,女主動機缺乏,該有的笑料也沒有;gary cooper年輕時可真是一個美人。
劉別謙膽子真肥,提出了這樣一個世紀(jì)難題:弗雷德里克馬奇和加里庫珀都愛你愛的死去活來(別做夢了OK),只選一個當(dāng)男朋友選誰呢?答案膽子更肥,兩個都要,三人行... 電影開頭真不錯,后半程相對就普通了些,不過“反派”角色還是蠻可愛的,一根筋,都不忍心說他什么...
好女孩二選一,壞女孩都要。
被友鄰說是「等邊三角形」的愛情,笑死!劉別謙的性別觀和愛情觀真的好超前!連買帽子之前都可以先試用,為什么挑選男人不可以呢?
今天去old vic theatre看了話劇版,很有喜感。演員們都很給力呀布景也沒,閃亮亮的發(fā)光
床上的灰塵,隔著屏幕我都覺得臟,連大洋彼岸的中國人都笑掉大牙了
少了俏頭的“祖與占”古典版,應(yīng)該是1女+2男愛情開山始祖。最后結(jié)局過于完美,3人攜手到永遠(yuǎn),接受無能。
前衛(wèi)的三人行。如果后來的「祖與占」中莫羅是女王,那么這部里的miriam hopkins就是公主~果然要強勢又有性格的女人才駕馭得住兩個男人。
改編自諾埃爾·考沃德的同名舞臺劇,和前作《天堂陷阱》的設(shè)置很像?!短焯孟葳濉分惺且荒兄苄趦膳g,而這部影片則是一女二男,性意識更加開放。影片前半段比較有趣,可惜后半段未能保持下去。結(jié)尾三個人擠進(jìn)了車中,又容易讓人想到《天》的結(jié)尾,不過這三人的關(guān)系該如何維持,君子協(xié)定?
在大蕭條之后,劉別謙用驚世駭俗的三人行故事來療愈壓抑的社會氛圍,照例是他擅長的暗喻與諷刺,對當(dāng)時商人的貪婪和人性墮落進(jìn)行了辛辣嘲諷,而兩位男主角波西米亞式的關(guān)系也對婚前性行為、一夫一妻制、性忠誠完全顛覆,在影片完美開篇里兩個男人熟睡,一個女人在注視他們并畫畫,從這里奠定了電影基調(diào),就是一部以女性觀點出發(fā)的影片,她的性饑渴、她對選男人如選帽子的理論、她的任性與直接都極其吸引人,而兩位男主角就像是兩個孩子,在“母親”的教育下學(xué)會了成長,在與“父親”的斗爭中重新獲得了母親的愛,電影結(jié)尾兩人還玩捉迷藏般躲在屏風(fēng)后面, 劉別謙觸動也在電影中展現(xiàn),打字機的性暗示和那個花盆,擦邊球打的高明,花盆的踢倒、撿起、踢倒細(xì)節(jié)也生動地暗示出這場婚姻中女人仍然沒有忘記那兩個男人,而這個商人也注定得到的也是場虛偽的婚姻
三人行
Immorality may be fun, but it isn’t fun enough to take the place of one hundred percent virtue and three square meals a day
前法典時期太敢玩了,早期大師們真沒給后世留什么創(chuàng)作空間啊……
第一反應(yīng):為什么你們?nèi)齻€不在一起第二反應(yīng):好像你們?nèi)齻€確實在一起了
性坦白 羅曼史 嘲諷 滑稽 都在兩男一女的“君子協(xié)定”中
比Jules et Jim多一個星
開頭無聲段落的演員出場真是驚艷,后面又變成了又臭又長的劉別謙臺詞情節(jié)劇。
【二男一女】【喜劇】
比較無聊
不是很懂你們這些開放的美國人,加里庫珀年輕時候長得好像巴斯特基頓啊