Ex-sleuth Nick Charles (Powell) doesn’t really want to go back to his old profession and why would he? He and wife Nora (Loy) live in the lap of luxury with nil to worry about. But Dorothy Wynant (O’Sullivan) is an old acquaintance of him and on the Christmas eve she has a foreboding that her father Clyde (Ellis) seems to renege on his promise of returning before Christmas to attend her upcoming wedding with Tommy (Wadsworth), as Clyde has gone on a secret business trip months earlier and no one has heard from him since, our reluctant gumshoe only manages to squeeze an interest in the case because Nora eggs him on solving the puzzle simply because it might keep boredom at bay, also for a husband to prove his worth to his wife is quite something can ginger up their marital bliss. Subsequently, Clyde’s secretary-cum-mistress Julia Wolf (Moorhead) is rubbed out in cold blood, discovered by Dorothy’s mother and Clyde’s ex-wife Mimi Jorgenson (Gombell, with perfect fussy cadence and ditziness) who alights on an implicating item, following by an in-the-know blackmailer croaked for his undue greed, then a skeleton is disinterred in Clyde’s work place which turns out to be deceased for months, whose identity can be easily inferred by detective story-savvy viewers, however, it is the climatic dinner pageantry during which Nick corrals all the suspects in one room before spilling the beans that deliciously spurs the suspense to the finishing line with a delightful veneer of sophistication and delectation. First of six in massive popular The Thin Man series, and adapted from mystery writer Dashiell Hammett's beloved source novel, W.S. Van Dyke’s series-generator eloquently and unashamedly melds a screwball-y jollification with the morbid procedural of a whodunit, transfused with a fluid agglomeration of nonchalant merry-making, shadowy ominousness, connubial bickering and canoodling in spite of their tonal discrepancy, the outcome is a unique genre-bending humdinger underlined by the optimal duo, William Powell and Myrna Loy’s dexterously relaxed, bibulously rollicking interplay, as well as the gimmicky showstopper, their button-cute fox terrier named Asta, that's the ace in the hole. referential entries: Gregory La Cava’s MY MAN GODFREY (1936, 7.4/10); John Huston’s The Maltese Falcon (1941, 8.4/10)
Ex-sleuth Nick Charles (Powell) doesn’t really want to go back to his old profession and why would he? He and wife Nora (Loy) live in the lap of luxury with nil to worry about. But Dorothy Wynant (O’Sullivan) is an old acquaintance of him and on the Christmas eve she has a foreboding that her father Clyde (Ellis) seems to renege on his promise of returning before Christmas to attend her upcoming wedding with Tommy (Wadsworth), as Clyde has gone on a secret business trip months earlier and no one has heard from him since, our reluctant gumshoe only manages to squeeze an interest in the case because Nora eggs him on solving the puzzle simply because it might keep boredom at bay, also for a husband to prove his worth to his wife is quite something can ginger up their marital bliss. Subsequently, Clyde’s secretary-cum-mistress Julia Wolf (Moorhead) is rubbed out in cold blood, discovered by Dorothy’s mother and Clyde’s ex-wife Mimi Jorgenson (Gombell, with perfect fussy cadence and ditziness) who alights on an implicating item, following by an in-the-know blackmailer croaked for his undue greed, then a skeleton is disinterred in Clyde’s work place which turns out to be deceased for months, whose identity can be easily inferred by detective story-savvy viewers, however, it is the climatic dinner pageantry during which Nick corrals all the suspects in one room before spilling the beans that deliciously spurs the suspense to the finishing line with a delightful veneer of sophistication and delectation. First of six in massive popular The Thin Man series, and adapted from mystery writer Dashiell Hammett's beloved source novel, W.S. Van Dyke’s series-generator eloquently and unashamedly melds a screwball-y jollification with the morbid procedural of a whodunit, transfused with a fluid agglomeration of nonchalant merry-making, shadowy ominousness, connubial bickering and canoodling in spite of their tonal discrepancy, the outcome is a unique genre-bending humdinger underlined by the optimal duo, William Powell and Myrna Loy’s dexterously relaxed, bibulously rollicking interplay, as well as the gimmicky showstopper, their button-cute fox terrier named Asta, that's the ace in the hole. referential entries: Gregory La Cava’s MY MAN GODFREY (1936, 7.4/10); John Huston’s The Maltese Falcon (1941, 8.4/10)
達(dá)希爾·哈米特的小說去年重版,我買了Kindle的合集,包括了《馬耳他之鷹》《玻璃鑰匙》《瘦子》《大陸偵探社》《血色收獲》《丹恩家的詛咒》《暗夜女子》《螺絲起子》八部,其中《暗夜女子》中還包括了薩姆?斯佩德系列的三個(gè)短篇。
哈米特在偵探小說界多有名?他是美國硬漢派小說的創(chuàng)始者,好萊塢黑色電影的主要?jiǎng)?chuàng)始人,他早年做過偵探,給了他日后創(chuàng)作的很多素材,30年代他進(jìn)入好萊塢編劇圈,先是把自己的作品《馬耳他之鷹》《瘦子》改編成電影,大獲成功,后來就開始專門寫劇本,還拿到了奧斯卡提名。
哈米特出生在1894年,他參加過一戰(zhàn)和二戰(zhàn),在二戰(zhàn)前后是美國著名的左派作家、反法西斯主義者,這使得他在50年代受到麥卡錫主義的迫害,他被迫離開了好萊塢,結(jié)束了自己的創(chuàng)作生涯。
《瘦子》是他在1934年出版的小說,幾乎算得上是他最后的長篇小說,之后他就開始了編劇生涯。小說出版后不久,他就把小說賣給了米高梅公司,并由兩位出色的編劇改成了電影劇本,米高梅老板拍板由威廉·鮑威爾和茂娜·洛挨來出演書中搞笑又聰明的偵探夫婦尼克和諾拉,電影拍得節(jié)奏飛快,在喜劇和懸疑兩方面都獲得了巨大的成功。
之后,哈米特又為這對偵探夫婦寫了五部續(xù)集電影1936年的《瘦子之后》(迷霧重重)1939年《另一個(gè)瘦子》(疑云重重)1941年《瘦子的影子》1945年《瘦子回家》(疑云風(fēng)波)1947年《瘦子之歌》。12年拍完六部曲,當(dāng)然和很多續(xù)集電影一樣算得上一部不如一部,但也最終結(jié)了尾,此時(shí)的好萊塢黑色電影的輝煌已經(jīng)過去,哈米特的創(chuàng)作也開始慢慢進(jìn)入了下坡。
哈米特在一戰(zhàn)時(shí)認(rèn)識(shí)了他后來的妻子,他們生育了兩個(gè)孩子,但是這段婚姻在哈米特來到好萊塢后就名存實(shí)亡,1937年,他們正式辦理了離婚手續(xù)。在好萊塢,哈米特先后與兩位女編劇尼爾·馬丁和莉莉·赫爾曼相戀,莉莉·赫爾曼是他人生中最后的伴侶,他們在一起生活了30年。哈米特在一戰(zhàn)時(shí)感染了西班牙流感,雖然治愈卻患了伴隨終生的結(jié)核病,40年代,他又開始酗酒,被麥卡錫主義迫害后的哈米特健康急劇直下,1961年,他因肺癌去世,年僅66歲。
本以為會(huì)是很輕松的,沒想到信息量這么大,真后悔選擇在這么熱鬧的地方看這片。。。
夫妻倆挺有愛,但破案非常兒戲
懸疑偵探類,更像家庭喜劇一點(diǎn),人物關(guān)系有點(diǎn)復(fù)雜。nick和nora還有他們的小狗組合還蠻適合塑造成熒幕icon。只不過結(jié)局我還是沒搞懂為啥是麥克利殺了威特納。原著作者好像還挺有名的。
有趣的不是案子,而是角色,在一干人物的來來往往中,男女主的插科打諢、冷嘲熱諷,帶著節(jié)奏一步步地尋根究底,充分釋放了角色的魅力。
當(dāng)瘋狂家族命案遭遇微醺罵俏偵探夫婦,罪上加醉,喜不自勝。誠如諾拉所言,“這是我所聽過的最好的一頓晚餐?!薄粴w為黑片類型實(shí)在有點(diǎn)夸張,難免讓人想起尼克在餐桌上的另句臺(tái)詞,“那餐刀你最好換種握法,否則會(huì)嚇到別人?!?/p>
推理過程幾乎可以忽略不計(jì),插科打諢為主,因人物眾多,結(jié)尾解密時(shí)其實(shí)仍有牽強(qiáng)之處;小狗太萌了。
懸疑感做的很好,就是推理的部分比較弱,主要還是William Powell和Myrna Loy飾演的這對夫妻搭檔太搶眼了,舉手投足的默契和可愛~
是我看過最詼諧的黑色電影了。大概是因?yàn)槟甏容^早,還不算很典型的黑色電影,嘰嘰喳喳的偵探夫妻倒是最大亮點(diǎn)……
1934年的電影哎,現(xiàn)在看起來還是很洋氣啊。案件現(xiàn)在看來雖不復(fù)雜,但有哈米特的原著打底,文本非常出色,臺(tái)詞極精彩,處處透著智慧和機(jī)巧,人物也都鮮明有趣,尤其是那對不停拌嘴又超有愛的偵探夫妻檔加上膽子賊小的狗兒,實(shí)在太好玩了。
3.5星,你以為是偵探片其實(shí)是家庭情景喜?。ú唬┩瑫r(shí)在補(bǔ)JB版福爾摩斯的我表示這個(gè)推理好——————弱
7.7 不像當(dāng)時(shí)的偵探電影一樣苦大仇深憤世嫉俗,輕松幽默,詼諧逗趣,尼克與諾拉打情罵俏中把案子破了,反而讓人都不想把它當(dāng)做偵探電影。
本著業(yè)余精神小打小鬧過偵探癮的尼克與諾拉調(diào)查發(fā)明家殺妻一案,盡管出師不利,夫妻倆卻笨手笨腳一路歪打正著,在一場宴會(huì)上揭曉了兇手的真面目本片改編自達(dá)希爾·漢密特的小說,獲得了當(dāng)年奧斯卡包括最佳影片在內(nèi)的四項(xiàng)提名,由此開始的尼克與諾拉系列是早期喜劇犯罪片的經(jīng)典作品。
片子真心看不出有多好。但作為和錢爺齊名的哈爺?shù)母木幾髌?,還是要看看的。懸念很一般,夫妻之間斗嘴倒是一大看點(diǎn),錢爺改編的電影,馬洛嘴都不夠賤啊。推薦斗嘴男女組合為水瓶VS白羊;處女VS天蝎;雙子和黃瓜。
破案是其次。這對貧嘴夫妻真可愛啊,William Powell渾身萌點(diǎn),Myrna Loy戲份還可以更多些。這對銀幕情侶的坑我入了!!
不僅是這一對愛意綿綿、醋意濃濃的活寶夫婦惹人愛,還有那條搶眼的狗狗,它的表演恰到好處~
有點(diǎn)希區(qū)柯克加阿加莎的感覺,前面慢條斯理又賣弄意趣的布展劇情,最后一幕召集大家聚集剖析案情揭示兇手。字幕渣,看得有些費(fèi)解。
應(yīng)該是最早的情侶/夫妻檔的喜劇懸疑風(fēng)電影,可惜這對銀幕伴侶反而不如后來者A Night to Remember (1942)合我口味。不過,從評(píng)分和續(xù)集數(shù)量來看,應(yīng)該是深受觀眾喜愛了。The Thin Man (1934)→Lady on a Train (1945)→North by Northwest (1959)這三部不同年代的懸疑片都在結(jié)尾留下了充滿性暗示的火車戲。65
詼諧的偵探劇,盡管推理過程很弱,但勝在這對小couple無敵可愛,虐死單身狗。(偵探喜劇先河,加一星)
男女主人公太配了,絕配!對白也很強(qiáng)!不過推理性很一般。
1934年的片子啊,要不是讀過原著還真不會(huì)去看電影呢??粗τ幸馑嫉暮诎灼?,里面的狗狗頗搞笑。據(jù)說后面還拍了5部續(xù)集,一部部看下去唄! -- 2011-11-22