議員瑞查得(約翰·斯坦丁 John Standing 飾)和妻子克羅麗薩(瓦妮莎·雷德格瑞夫 Vanessa Redgrave 飾)結婚已經(jīng)三十余年了,彼此之間感情十分穩(wěn)定??肆_麗薩正在準備一場盛大而奢華的宴會,這樣的“工作”她已經(jīng)進行了無數(shù)次,自然將一切打點得井井有條。
一位名為彼得(艾倫·考克斯 Alan Cox 飾)不速之客的出現(xiàn)讓克羅麗薩的思緒回到了從前,彼時,她是風華正茂的少女,遇見了同樣年輕英俊的彼得,兩人情投意合,在一起度過了一段難忘的快樂時光。然而,瑞查得的出現(xiàn)卻徹底改變了這一對佳偶的命運,最終,克羅麗薩選擇了瑞查得,失望的彼得遠走他鄉(xiāng)。如今,彼得再度回到了克羅麗薩的身邊,克羅麗薩發(fā)現(xiàn),一種久違的激情和火熱在胸中來回攢動。
我想談談彼得。許是最近在看《霍亂時期的愛情》,總會不經(jīng)意間講彼得和阿里薩聯(lián)系在一起。盡管后者我只看了一半。
兩個人的共同點有很多:早期都無比深愛女主,后被女主拒絕后就郁郁寡歡,麻木地用性或是愛與一個又一個女人發(fā)生關系。當然阿里薩更甚些。他們都將自己視為受害者,認為是女主的拒絕將自己淪落至此。
很巧的是,最近看到的《圓桌派》里,幾位嘉賓就談到了 失戀 這個話題。有些人用死亡,或者是自虐,自暴自棄等等極端的方式來報復對方。性愛泛濫也是報復的一種方式。
對此,我有太多的不解。原來愛情因為不得可以丑陋到這種地步。這也是經(jīng)常有人說的 分手之后見人品 的表現(xiàn)。愛而不得,縱然有千萬種不甘,也到不了去傷害去抹黑曾經(jīng)那個被自己深愛過的人啊。這不就是變相地侮辱自己嗎?
我很羨慕以前人們的愛情。林徽因與金岳霖。舊情固然難忘,但是也應該用自己的最高理智去駕馭、主宰自己的愛情和幸福。
Making little splash upon its release, reckoned as a box office disaster and largely went under the radar in the awards season, Dutch director Marleen Gorris’ adaptation of Virginia Woolf’s MRS. DALLOWAY, the follow-up of her Oscar-winning picture ANTONIA’S LINE (1995), is indeed a predominantly distaff labor of love: the late DP Sue Gibson was the first female member of the British Society of Cinematographers, and later became its first female president in 2008; its soothing score is composed by Ilona Sekacz, and the script is penned by none other than Dame Eileen Atkins.
Although the film’s bleak fiscal reception almost bankrupted Atkins (since she and her husband Bill Shepherd invested their own money to this passion project), as a Woolf connoisseur, she would brave another writing-dabbling in Chanya Button’s VITA AND VIRGINIA (2018), starring Elizabeth Debicki as Virginia and Gemma Arterton as author Vita Sachville-West, the inspiration behind Woolf’s ORLANDO, hope you haven’t invested your nest egg this time, Dame Atkins.
Therefore, one might offhand gauge that Gorris’ work is rather unremarkable, especially compared to Stephen Daldry’s virtuoso THE HOURS (2002), Michael Cunningham’s Pulitzer winning source novel is a re-imagination of MRS. DALLOWAY’s influence on three women from three different generations (including the last day of Ms. Woolf herself), but truth to be told, Gorris and her team has achieved no small feat in reifying the novel’s freewheeling stream of consciousness, garnering the inner thoughts of Ms. Clarissa Dalloway’s (Redgrave), the wife of politician Richard Dalloway (Standing), on the day of June 13, 1923, London (echoing THE HOURS’ one-day time-frame, and herself is reincarnated by the party-planning Clarissa Vaughan in the modern day New York), when she prepares a party which she will host later that evening in her residence.
The unbidden visit of her old flame Peter Walsh (Kitchen), who returns to London after years in India, disconcerts Clarissa, whose memories hack back to the era when she was a young girl (McElhone), her dithering decision between a young Peter (Cox) and a young Richard (Portal), with the former she feel suffocated by his passionate affection and with the latter, what they cherish is a more secure, placid kind of love that grants her room to breathe, so finally she chooses Richard and breaks Peter’s heart. She also fondly reminisces the friendship between her and Sally (Headey), with whom she spontaneously shares a kiss, and is apparently ruffled by the thrill. Gorris nimbly juggles between present and past with an unshowy fluidity that quietly contemplates the characters’ strength in conveying the nuanced, unfeigned, affectionate outpouring of their feelings, including a subplot about a WWI veteran Septimus Warren Smith (Graves), who is ailed by delayed shell shock, and whose tragedy prompts Clarissa to deliberate darker thought on the eve of her party, where all her current and old friends are congregated together, and she saves her last dance to Peter.
A radiant Redgrave is gilded with sublime vulnerability and elegance, but inwardly, her Mrs. Dalloway is an unusual heroine who sagaciously forsakes passionate impulse for a less adventurous life that befits her, as opposing to most cinematic portraying of young girls, and among its capable dramatis personae, Rupert Graves stands out in exemplifying a young man’s war-stricken psyche with soul-shattering pathos. At any rate, MRS. DALLOWAY is a beautiful endeavor to visual Woolf’s text on the screen and it prevails over any skepticism that this female-led delicacy is anything but affecting.
referential entries: Sally Potter’s ORLANDO (1992, 7.4/10); Stephen Daldry’s THE HOURS (2002, 9.4/10).
Mrs.Dalloway的一天,或一生。劇本竟然是DEA寫的,VR到底多高,舉手投足高貴優(yōu)雅的氣質不是所有英國人都有的。
無味
認識你自己。
女人到底應該怎樣過其一生
來看Vanessa Redgrave. 意識流實在不好拍,你以為的不是我以為,我想的不是你想的,結尾一段比較精彩。難怪伍爾夫說讀了追憶之后就揮之不去那種文風和印象。Vanessa實在高貴,現(xiàn)在看到她便想起烏曼寫如何害怕她哈哈。
everyone is mrs dalloway
愛啊,真難!能有多少人,中年之后還能與人生最初的戀人重逢,而又不彼此傷害,且,不對身邊的人造成傷害?ps,但凡聚會,總有音樂和集體跳舞,真high~羨慕。那對年輕夫妻,配角,安排的意義?反戰(zhàn)?
飄忽不定。
Aways? (應該TS演S)
黛洛維夫人的一天,或一生。
。。。壓抑 看不懂
好吧,我看不出來好來
原著沒看。the hours就是這個的同人文,但又比這個好得多。
都是老戲骨。
在圖書館看的,很能激起我的感情,我入迷了,想起泰國的男子.
非常白開水的改編,寡淡無味,流水賬似的搬原著劇情,表現(xiàn)回憶只剩閃回,轉場只剩硬切。
1999(?) HKIFF
3.5 漸入佳境。想重溫the hours.
DVD畫質,期待高清畫質再看時間,人生
“這讓我感受到生活的美麗”