Siddartha (Dhritiman Chatterjee) is forced to discontinue his medical studies due to unexpected and brutal death of his father. He has to now find a job in stead. In one job interview, he is asked to name the most significant world event in the last ten years. His reply is 'the plain human courage shown by the people of Vietnam', instead of the expected - man landing on moon. The interviewer asks is he is a communist. Needles to say that he does not get the job.
He reaches a coffee shop where he is offered to work for the communist party. When he does not show any interest the party leader tells him about an opening for a medical representative. To escape from the heat and have a snooze, he goes in to a cinema. As a government propaganda newsreel is being shown before the feature, a bomb explodes in the cinema hall. In the stampede that follows, Siddartha, breaks his watch. He goes to a watchmaker but he cannot afford the repairs.
Waiting to cross the road, he notices a sexy girl. He drifts back to his days as a medical student in a flashback. The professor is explaining anatomy of female breast. Many flashbacks and dreams occur to Siddartha through the film.
On his way to hostel, he has an encounter with some hippies. Along with an ex-classmate, he goes out to see a porn film but to their disappointment, the film turns out to be not-so-pornographic.
In such constant wandering in a Calcutta, disintegrated relationships with his sister and a Naxalite (militant communist) brother, his friendship with Keya is only thing that keeps him sane.
Keya is a simple girl. They enjoy each other's company but they cannot make any commitment to each other due to the circumstances.
After yet another attempt at a job interview, Siddartha leaves the big city to take a modest job of a salesman in a far off small town. He writes to Keya that he still cherishes their relationship. And that he has heard that bird call again but this time it is for real, and not his mind. After completing the letter, he comes out to the balcony of his modest room. The bird calls again. He also hears the sombre chants of a funeral procession. As he turns to the camera, the picture is frozen.
This is the first film of the Calcutta Trilogy. The other two were and Seemabaddha (Company Limited, 1971) and Jana Aranya (The Middle Man, 1975). All the three films study the effect the big city of Calcutta has on the educated youth and the price it extracts from them.
The seventies were a difficult period for India and West Bengal. The Corruption was rampant; the Naxalite movement had created havoc in Calcutta. In fact, they had turned parts of Calcutta into 'liberated zones'. By the time the Naxalite movement died down, in 1975, Mrs. Indira Gandhi (then, Prime Minister of India) suppressed the fundamental rights and declared "Emergency" for her own political survival. Her son, Sanjay Gandhi became a dictator of sorts without any official designation. The opposition leaders were thrown into prisons.
About his social responsibilities as a filmmaker, in an interview with Cineaste magazine, Ray commented, "You can see my attitude in The Adversary where you have two brothers. The younger brother is a Naxalite. There is no doubt that the elder brother admires the younger brother for his bravery and convictions. The film is not ambiguous about that. As a filmmaker, however, I was more interested in the elder brother because he is the vacillating character. As a psychological entity, as a human being with doubts, he is a more interesting character to me. The younger brother has already identified himself with a cause. That makes him part of a total attitude and makes him unimportant. The Naxalite movement takes over. He, as a person, becomes insignificant."
In a letter to Seton in 1970, Ray wrote that Pratidwandi was the most provocative film he had made till then. The film is said to have evoked extreme reactions. "People either loved the film or hated it", Dhritiman Chatterjee told Andrew Robinson, Ray's biographer.
在影片開(kāi)場(chǎng)幾分鐘的面試段落即闡明了本片想要表達(dá)什么——60年代最重要的事是什么?人類(lèi)登月還是越南戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)。一個(gè)是科技之榮光、資本之神力的”文明新高度“,一個(gè)是第三世界人民群眾用血與淚所書(shū)寫(xiě)的人民史詩(shī),主角選擇了后者。此時(shí)的他尚不能以完整的邏輯來(lái)反駁選擇前者的雇主,只是憑著良心與熱血站在越南人民這一邊。
60年代是不平凡的年代,遠(yuǎn)在大洋彼岸,二戰(zhàn)后的美國(guó)青年已在物質(zhì)極度豐足的資本主義社會(huì)中感受到了人生之虛無(wú),他們掀起一連串反對(duì)原有秩序的運(yùn)動(dòng):反戰(zhàn)運(yùn)動(dòng)、嬉皮士運(yùn)動(dòng)、女權(quán)運(yùn)動(dòng)、黑人平權(quán)運(yùn)動(dòng)。那些被資本主義所放逐、或稱(chēng)自我放逐的嬉皮士迅游各國(guó),他們來(lái)到印度,贊嘆這里文明之迥異、歷史之悠久,然而此時(shí)現(xiàn)代化與城市化正在印度高歌猛進(jìn)。既被納入資本主義全球化,周期性危機(jī)與失業(yè)率飆高自不能幸免。電影的主角正是在此環(huán)境下艱辛求職的一個(gè)。
與扮演”思考者“角色的主角不同,其姐正恐為人后地?fù)肀е@個(gè)劇變的時(shí)代。她聰明好學(xué),工作得心應(yīng)手,父親去世后,是她撐起了這個(gè)家。與傳統(tǒng)觀念相背離的是,她懂得利用自己的“情色資本”為自己在市場(chǎng)謀得更高價(jià)值,這遠(yuǎn)比避免閑言碎語(yǔ)或者不讓母親難過(guò)要重要的多。面對(duì)已分道揚(yáng)鑣的姐姐,主角想扮演的是傳統(tǒng)價(jià)值的捍衛(wèi)者,他想回到童年姐弟兩小無(wú)猜的年代,那是資本還沒(méi)有侵蝕一切的年代。
堂兄是另一類(lèi)思想堅(jiān)決的人,他是大革命的狂熱分子,切的粉絲——這一切應(yīng)當(dāng)以暴力來(lái)推翻。在聽(tīng)聞堂兄一番關(guān)于大革命的辯駁之后,主角幻想自己變成斷頭臺(tái)上的路易十六,暴力看起來(lái)似乎太血腥了。
在彷徨之時(shí),主角奇遇般的與資產(chǎn)階級(jí)小姐陷入愛(ài)情。哦,原來(lái)她也有她的煩惱,她的家人也都是善良無(wú)害的人??缭诫A級(jí)的理解甚至愛(ài)情是存在的。那些革命分子在街頭對(duì)富人實(shí)施的暴力是非理性的——總覺(jué)的這段很有點(diǎn)牽強(qiáng)附會(huì)。
與開(kāi)頭相呼應(yīng),結(jié)尾時(shí)主角依然在面試,這一次他終于做出了選擇,那便是反抗,向剝削者討回做人的權(quán)力。在留存率4/70的面試中應(yīng)聘者們受到非人的待遇,而雇主卻說(shuō)”如果他的身體不能堅(jiān)持下來(lái)那他怎么勝任這份工作“。曾為醫(yī)學(xué)生的主角,再次以”專(zhuān)業(yè)“的視角看向這群面試者——他們的身體被還原為最原初的物質(zhì)狀態(tài),只是資本世界一具具承擔(dān)著工作功能的器具。然而,拋開(kāi)這個(gè)視角的神來(lái)之筆,我不認(rèn)為主角的這一舉動(dòng)是全然邏輯自洽的選擇,而看起來(lái)更像是沖動(dòng)之舉,似乎電影試圖給觀眾一個(gè)他們所期待的高潮式的結(jié)尾,將情緒渲染到極高點(diǎn),讓積累的怒氣得以宣泄。然而反抗的對(duì)象只是”雇主“這一壓迫者么?
慢熱型電影,結(jié)尾非常利落酷洌。一些超現(xiàn)實(shí)的影像手法,算是我看到的Ray片子中最prominent的一回。大贊兼推薦。
結(jié)尾爆發(fā)了 我們都是行尸走肉
三星半。又是公司又是富裕階層,算雷伊的長(zhǎng)項(xiàng)。插入了手法痕跡很重的幾個(gè)小段落
Pratidwandi (1972) avi 1.36G
清醒的意識(shí),幾乎不隱蔽地借助角色的嘴巴道出導(dǎo)演蘊(yùn)藏在心理里的思索,關(guān)乎社會(huì)命運(yùn)、政治與個(gè)人、現(xiàn)代存在觀。。。
不知道翻譯為什么叫這個(gè)名字。人與人都是一樣的對(duì)嗎,我們也不是動(dòng)物對(duì)嗎
三次負(fù)片效果指向悉達(dá)多的創(chuàng)傷,也引導(dǎo)他的彷徨。三次想象:一是過(guò)往的平靜,二是閃前效果的欲望與反抗,三是對(duì)死亡的恐懼。悉達(dá)多始終處于內(nèi)部與外部理想與現(xiàn)實(shí)雙重的荒誕區(qū)間中,他的彷徨來(lái)自于這種游弋與不確定,代表了整個(gè)一代印度知識(shí)青年的迷惑狀態(tài)。而影片里所有這種巨大荒誕落差的來(lái)源全都指向回當(dāng)時(shí)印度混亂的政治環(huán)境,影片里有太多錯(cuò)綜復(fù)雜的政治符號(hào)了。
世人皆知那個(gè)淳樸自然的雷伊,他后期這些先鋒的佳作則被忽視和遺忘,雖然也是前者決定了他于世影史的意義但仍不由唏噓,本片的視聽(tīng)技法比他六十年代剛尋求轉(zhuǎn)型時(shí)明顯更進(jìn)一籌,超現(xiàn)實(shí)和夢(mèng)境的元素大贊,冷峻疏離感甚至隱隱有些日本新浪潮的味道,對(duì)負(fù)片的運(yùn)用以及結(jié)尾肉體變骷髏的設(shè)計(jì)令人驚艷…最令人感嘆者莫過(guò)于閃回片段的童年畫(huà)面恍惚重回阿普,阿普的世界無(wú)論于雷伊電影中還是于印度都是注定遠(yuǎn)逝的鄉(xiāng)愁
49.37+55.39
不一樣的雷伊
https://www.bilibili.com/video/av10989386/
剛步入社會(huì)找工作,卻處處碰壁,一身正義無(wú)處安放
感覺(jué)整部影片一直都處在1.25倍速,照三部曲多了許多狂躁,體現(xiàn)在鏡頭題材,雷伊這是經(jīng)歷了什么
雷伊后期代表作,法式筆法和現(xiàn)代社會(huì)批判主題,另一邊不忘重回印度政治社會(huì)現(xiàn)實(shí)和家庭觀念變遷,妹妹是私營(yíng)企業(yè)員工,哥哥是熱血的革命者,曖昧對(duì)象是中產(chǎn)階級(jí)的女兒,悉達(dá)多最后終于被流放,遠(yuǎn)離城市,遠(yuǎn)離現(xiàn)代社會(huì),才又找回童年記憶里那只青鳥(niǎo)。結(jié)尾部分尤其干脆有力,非常大師氣魄。
那些由疊現(xiàn)的時(shí)空映像交織出的隱秘的情感激流。|所有與曖昧女孩的旁線都四星半。
除了三部曲,雷伊后期作品被嚴(yán)重忽略。本片承繼新現(xiàn)實(shí)主義而來(lái),又帶點(diǎn)法國(guó)存在主義的批判意識(shí)。幾個(gè)超現(xiàn)實(shí)的主觀鏡頭跳接的直接而自然,最贊片末的尸骨:現(xiàn)代社會(huì)的行尸走肉。依然有雷伊最熟悉的題材:家庭。青年的迷惘影射社會(huì)的變革。
憤怒的失業(yè)青年和一閃而過(guò)的毛像
2022戛納經(jīng)典修復(fù)單元。(最近和布努埃爾廳的一些綁定) 新片會(huì)踩雷,但還好還有那些60、70年代全世界思潮最洶涌的時(shí)候的作品可以??闯P?。城市化中的勞動(dòng)者保障、階層問(wèn)題等等,“那你是共產(chǎn)主義者嗎”,當(dāng)立場(chǎng)大于了僅僅是做出符合人性的行為本身時(shí)。所以才把主人公設(shè)置為醫(yī)學(xué)畢業(yè)卻求職無(wú)門(mén)的青年,當(dāng)每個(gè)人都平等地是由肌肉包裹骨骼構(gòu)成的生命的時(shí)候,為什么永遠(yuǎn)有人站在樓頂俯瞰那些剩下的人呢
把那么窮苦骯臟的加爾各答,拍出19世紀(jì)俄國(guó)鄉(xiāng)下莊園的感覺(jué),我說(shuō)的是同樣關(guān)于無(wú)用之人的《奧勃洛廖夫》。1970年代,在求職和社會(huì)理想方面都不得知的印度知識(shí)青年悉達(dá)多,實(shí)在太頹喪了。即便狀態(tài)捕捉可能完全準(zhǔn)確,也會(huì)讓觀眾跟著頹喪吧。尤其結(jié)尾酷暑之日等待面試的15分鐘,夜晚來(lái)看,簡(jiǎn)直也被催眠,直至最后的個(gè)體革命暴動(dòng)。
雷伊罕為人知的杰作!