狄爾格在政治上是一個活躍分子,但被錯誤起訴,罪名是謀殺當?shù)毓S工人,將被執(zhí)行死刑,他越獄逃脫,受傷后闖入了一位女教師諾拉的家里,沒想到她正準備把房子租給一位名聲顯赫的法學(xué)教授……
第30屆法羅島電影節(jié)第5個放映日為大家?guī)碇鞲傎悊卧摹缎℃?zhèn)話語》,下面請看場刊影評人的評價了!
Acchan
故事不止于法律探討,看似內(nèi)核涉及大陸法系和英美法系的哲理思辨,實則仍基于一個藝術(shù)-電影的史學(xué)分合路線,即好萊塢出自建構(gòu)主義的藝術(shù)創(chuàng)作基調(diào)——相信人性和情感的古典原動力,情動必然大于辯理。 則主角必定掌握著絕對的道德傾向而決定了他的弧線走向緊緊綁定著通理的價值判斷,這是好萊塢的基礎(chǔ),也是所謂保守的來源。全片的氛圍亦在不斷地強調(diào)著這一心理預(yù)期,并試圖以法官的存在假裝擾亂這一過程,實則是進一步反襯主角的正當性。 而觀眾等同暴動的人民,他們樸素著義憤填膺,但永遠不忘施加暴行,那么電影是誰?前半是法官,建立規(guī)則-世界觀,后半是主角,用行動造夢-生情,兩者握手,撫平暴行,規(guī)則和現(xiàn)實吻合,觀眾得到安慰,人性的溫良無條件地位于中心,滿載淳樸的信任,矛盾也只是它的墊腳石。
子夜無人
★★★☆☆ 沒關(guān)系,我蘭是花瓶。
像音片碎
沒記住
漩渦之外
前半段陰差陽錯的喜劇笑點疊加詼諧風趣,眾多人物關(guān)系的“錯中錯”,安排蠻有匠心,琪恩仍然精準到位地演繹可愛正義的喜劇女孩。后面節(jié)奏稍拖,三人感情表達不夠精練。在結(jié)尾點明了法理與情理的關(guān)系,回到了正軌。
阿斯巴-甜
看完讓人覺得那個時代的好萊塢只剩矯揉造作
一顆大檸檬
[3-]喜劇部分尚可,后面亂糟糟的就沒意思了,建議是三個人一起生活沒必要非得定下來
在網(wǎng)上搜了下,沒看到什么劇情描述,把英文的貼過來。
The Story
The opening sequence involves a flaming factory, a missing foreman, and an accused worker. Leopold Dilg (Cary Grant), a factory worker and a self-professed radical and political anarchist is falsely accused (framed on trumped-up charges of arson and murder) in a small New England town by the factory owner Andrew Holmes (Charles Dingle), for setting fire to the Holmes Woolen Mill factory and killing its guard/foreman Clyde Bracken (Tom Tyler). After being arrested, tried, and sentenced to hang, Dilg escapes from prison, goes on the run from the police, and hides out in the secluded country home of high-schoolteacher Nora Shelley (Jean Arthur). She is in the midst of preparing the old farmhouse (Sweetbrook cottage) in which she used to live for summer rental, as the fugitive with a badly injured ankle arrives. They had known each other as schoolmates:
Nora: Leopold, as far as I know, you're capable of anything, even burning a factory. You were the wildest kid that ever went to a Locester school. Dilg: You wore pigtails then. I was in love with you.
Amusing circumstances arise as she attempts to keep his presence a secret in the attic from the unsuspecting renter who arrives unexpectedly 24 hours early, due to the fault of his secretary. The tenant is a conservative, strict law-and-order, Dean of Commonwealth Law School and legal scholar, Professor Michael Lightcap (Ronald Colman), who is being considered for a Supreme Court appointment. The erudite professor hears Dilg snoring at night, and thinking it's Nora, remarks: "She must have adenoids." Nora is forced to identify Dilg as "Joseph," the gardener to the professor. In a classic scene, she drops the professor's egg breakfast on the newspaper's front page, where Dilg's picture is portrayed with the headline: "DILG ESCAPES TRAP!"
Dilg and Lightcap become engaged in long arguments about the law. Dilg maintains that the law is "a gun pointed at someone's head" rather than being created with common sense for what people actually do. Although they disagree at first, Dilg is persuasive. The professor learns Dilg's real identity, but must be careful not to hurt his chances for appointment when he defends and reopens Dilg's case.
In the end, Lightcap helps clear Dilg of his crime, defends his rights, and uncovers a frame-up, with a stirring speech in front of the courtroom to an unruly mob:
His (Dilg's) only crime was that he had courage and spoke his mind...This is your law and your finest possession. It makes you free men in a free country. Why have you come here to destroy it? If you know what's good for you, take those weapons home and burn them - and then think. Think of this country and of the law that makes it what it is. Think of a world crying for this very law. Then maybe you'll understand why you ought to guard it, and why the law has got to be the personal concern of every citizen, to uphold it for your neighbor as well as for yourself. Violence against it is one mistake. Another mistake is for any man to look upon the law as just a set of principles. Just so much language printed on fine, heavy paper. Something he recites and then leans back and takes it for granted that justice is automatically being done. Both kinds of men are equally wrong. The law must be engraved in our hearts and practiced every minute, to the letter and spirit. It can't even exist unless we're willing to go down into the dust and blood and fight a battle every day of our lives to preserve it, for our neighbor as well as ourselves.
The studio originally shot two different conclusions to the film -- one where Cary Grant gets the girl, and one where Ronald Colman wins Jean Arthur's affections. The film ends with both Dilg and Nora in Washington, to see Lightcap take his rightful place on the judicial bench. Although Nora winks at the judge, she races after Dilg for a film-ending embrace in the hallway of the US Supreme Court building.
那個年代的電影都這么抓人的嗎, 豐富又利索。在樂觀的人眼中,曖昧是漫長冷靜的旋律,只是情感中若有似無的部分。沒有刻意的接近與親吻。而且永遠不擔心沒人來愛我,對有一點好感的親一下,對另一個親了很多下。那是一種自然而然的疼愛與保護欲?!耙粋€積極的人必須活動他的腿腳?!薄坝靡恍┠懵犨^的謊言,我給她一種她沒有的性質(zhì)和魅力,我研究每個女人最顯著的弱點……長期偽裝我的靈魂?!币粋€人對另一個人的稱呼真的特別重要啊。
“i’ve perjured my soul for thousands of years to come” hahaha LOVE
3.5星,對于史蒂文斯電影的節(jié)奏一直不大喜歡,他的電影就像是一個一流的交響樂隊配上了一個二流的指揮家。本片劇情其實還是很有想法的,一部帶點黑色味道的神經(jīng)喜劇而且還有考爾曼與格蘭特火花四射的精彩對飚,但是最終因為這個二流指揮的問題讓這部電影終究還是差了口氣,浪費了一個好劇本。
基因的排列組合影響了相貌,而相貌毅然決然地影響了星路!喬治克魯尼和加利格蘭特是不是親戚?
加里·格蘭特主演的輕喜劇,嘛嘛地~~
當他把胡子刮掉的那一瞬間我又被秒殺了?。。?!啊啊?。。?!今天是花癡的一天?。?!
老電影里總有豐富的戲劇沖突,這種古典味道現(xiàn)在已經(jīng)難以尋覓。Cary Grant果然總是在最后得到女主角,但個人為Roland Colman抱不平,絕對的紳士,整部電影他最閃耀。PS,Jean Arthur發(fā)揮水平正常,就是造型太失敗,看上去好顯老。
7.5 前半段夾著罪案與法制辯論滾雪球妙趣橫生,雖然需要完成情節(jié)并宣揚法制無可厚非,但是后半段對愛情線的刻畫亮點不多,導(dǎo)致喜劇氛圍的營造也平平無奇。
這一片的編劇部門顯得很緊張,迫不及待的丟出各種妙語,忙亂的把女主角像個繡球似的在兩個男人之間拋來拋去,但是各種橋段和細節(jié)顯得干巴生硬,未能充分的組合到一起。應(yīng)該是過多次重寫劇本的結(jié)果。不過電影的主線,關(guān)于法律精神的討論,還是站住了。
黃金時代罕見的類型復(fù)合片,而且有趣的是三位主角的人設(shè)就對此有所指涉:瀟灑嫌疑犯Cary Grant(犯罪/喜劇)、喜感多情的Jean Arthur(喜劇/愛情)、拘謹法學(xué)教授Ronald Colman(劇情/律政)。 ///// 看是George Stevens導(dǎo)演、開場又是罪犯逃脫,以為會是犯罪劇情片,結(jié)果畫風慢慢轉(zhuǎn)變,二三十分鐘處就變成了Screwball喜劇,而到了大情節(jié)點出現(xiàn)時犯罪(破案、法庭)和正?。ǜ星榫€的動人時刻)類型再次進入;全片不斷在氛圍上轉(zhuǎn)變卻又不顯突兀,這種類型并存比類型融合難度系數(shù)要大得多,編劇聰明、導(dǎo)演Stevens掌控力也是一流。 ///// Jean Arthur這種不靠美貌靠喜感立足的女演員在那時是個珍寶,算是Renée Zellweger傻妞類型的模版吧。
Ronald Colman在法庭上開槍那一瞬間真是擦著了老娘的心火
公眾是一把槍,誰輿論的好,就聽誰的話。Colman十分出彩,前后的改觀,又帥又憨,Grant真是再次被搶戲,卻又抱得Arthur歸
2012.02.23 My poor justice……CG已經(jīng)擁有那么多,為什么還要奪去教授的愛╮(╯▽╰)╭結(jié)局太糾結(jié)了。。。BTW,大叔剃了胡子瞬間魅力四射了啊喂!【花癡ING~】
3.5+ 劇本很有趣,前半段里攝影和調(diào)度挺有想法的,跟劇情的設(shè)置也有關(guān)吧,可惜沒能keep up. Jean太可愛啦!煎蛋遮臉笑得我sadkhfdshgfslakhg; Grant太不討喜了表現(xiàn)也被另外兩人艷壓...
黑色電影+神經(jīng)喜劇。
Digitized in 2K in 2021 by Sony at laboratory Roundabout West, Santa Monica
前半段陰差陽錯的喜劇笑點疊加詼諧風趣,眾多人物關(guān)系的“錯中錯”,安排蠻有匠心,琪恩仍然精準到位地演繹可愛正義的喜劇女孩。后面節(jié)奏稍拖,三人感情表達不夠精練。在結(jié)尾點明了法理與情理的關(guān)系,回到了正軌。
和其它男演員演對手戲時,CG比較容易被搶戲,不過最后得到女主角的總會是他……
笑點太少了。不過Jean Arthur真的好棒,臺詞被她說出來都那么有意思
21/9/8