妲英和正碩交往已經(jīng)六年多了,妲英在朋友與家人的雙重壓力下很想早點結婚, 但正碩卻遲遲不肯結婚. 姝英因教授引薦進入一家公司做實習生,遇到從美國來的帥哥酷男俊元, 兩人氣焰互有消長。正碩和蘭姬終于步入結婚禮堂,妲英心有不甘又能奈何。妲英享受單身生活,輕松愉快找工作卻處處碰壁、心灰意冷,失望之極,父親無意間得知妲英已經(jīng)離職,拿了一筆錢給妲英出國旅行。
妲英重起爐灶進入保險公司上班,序持續(xù)緊追妲英,妲英心里倍感溫馨。姝英和俊元的感情也進展順利,而媽媽得知爸爸已經(jīng)離職,決心離開爸爸。正惠告訴姝英,妲英在酒店上班的事,這件事讓姝英內(nèi)心感到愧疚不已,于是姝英勸妲英離開酒店。正碩因被蘭姬冷落,所以打算回到妲英身邊。而苦追妲英的序,目擊到正碩正在要求妲英回到他身邊,使序氣得與正碩大打一架,而不知情的妲英,正打算要把去酒店上班的事告訴序。
序跟妲英經(jīng)歷了一場風波,最終和好如初,感情快速進展。爸爸媽媽一趟溫泉之旅享受美好時光。序親口跟妲英求婚,回家之后妲英發(fā)現(xiàn)家人已經(jīng)知道她房子的事,正碩則對妲英的結婚的消息感到慚愧和祝福,并且約見序。正在忙著準備開業(yè)的姝英,聽到父母要來家里,回家整理俊元的東西,結果還是被父親發(fā)現(xiàn)。而序則安排時間讓母親和妲英相見。序母因妲英的身世平凡,反對他們結婚。妲英明白序的苦惱,因而提出分手。妲英旅行社開幕,姐妹倆滿懷希望等待成功。另一方面,蘭姬則利用舊情人作出一連串的破壞計謀。妲英的父母得知序跟妲英求婚后,替妲英高興??墒牵в⒛赣H約序的母親見面后才見真相。妲英母親知道妲英婚事破碎,心如刀割,妲英努力工作藉以瘉合傷口。旅行社業(yè)務蒸蒸日上,卻遭蘭姬從中破壞,正碩正式與蘭姬分手。姝英和俊元歡喜冤家終于步入結婚禮堂.....
Other than being a sartorial trendsetter of its namesake Kitty Foyle dress, Sam Wood’s solid screen adaptation of Christopher Morley’s novel, penned by Mr. Trumbo, also confers its star Ginger Rogers a golden opportunity to strut her stuff, not her usual terpsichorean nimbleness, but her acting bent, and its reward is a hard-earned Oscar statuette, pipping strong contenders like Bette Davis in THE LETTER (1940, 8.0/10), Joan Fontaine in REBECCA (1940, 8.3/10) and Katharine Hepburn in THE PHILADELPHIA STORY (1940, 8.1/10).
After a prologue demonstrating the victory of gender equity in the beginning of twentieth century, here comes our heroine Kitty Foyle (Rogers), a New York saleswoman from Philadelphia, facing a difficult choice, there are two suitors awaiting her at midnight, one is doctor Mark Eisen (Craig) who loves her affectionately and another is her sweetheart Wyn Strafford (Morgan), whom she is enamored with, but a married man now who proposes that they can start anew in South America. When dithering about her decision, the film segues through a series of flashbacks (à la PENNY SERENADE 1941)with a snow globe as its mnemonic cue, detailing Kitty’s past entanglement with those two men, especially with Wyn, from their first meeting in Philly, their romance is congenially tainted by their social echelons, Wyn is from a prosperous banker’s family and she is merely his secretary, a rubberneck of the Assembly which Wyn attends annually. Acting in accordance with its woman-empowering tenet, the film vouchsafes Kitty a carte blanche by suggesting that Wyn is too meek and callow to make up his own mind. So Kitty leaves Philly when she knows a wedding proposal is too quixotic at that point, and in NYC, she is courted by Mark, who is the opposite of Wyn’s opulence, with a slightly prosaic air of practicality.
Life’s vagaries again bring Wyn to her, this time with a sincere marriage proposal and lavish pageantry to swoon her, they tie the knot, but reality check creeps in when Kitty has to face Wyn’s family and their unrelieved gentility, once more she braves herself to cut the Gordian knot. There are more hammer blows await her but as a paragon of modern woman with an absolutely righteous mind, Kitty proves herself a real hoop-jumper, and this time, she will make a right choice once and for all.
Ms. Rogers is most sympathetic when she brings forth Kitty's fortitude in the face of adversities, but the story’s emotional potency is detrimentally hampered by the white-washing of the hardship of being an independent woman surviving in a big city by all herself, Kitty is presented with an ineradicable veneer of silver screen allure which inexorablyrenders the tonality a shade condescending and contrived to any audience who chances upon it in the 21st century. Two supporting stars,Dennis Morgan and James Craig both make a great impression as an open-faced, suave gentleman without wiles, what differentiates them is where do they come from, not a bad marriage advice for today’s singletons although the film itself is as workmanlike as it is anodyne, a typical end product of Hollywood in thrall of production code,but not exactly a "natural" history of a woman.
referential points: Sam Wood’s THE DEVIL AND MISS JONES (1941, 7.2/10),George Steven’sPENNY SERENADE (1941, 7.0/10)
對鏡自語同框剪輯,怎么也轉(zhuǎn)不過去的水晶球。工廠造星年代,29歲的金姐一臉滄桑。
7.6 女權題材,劇本敘事工整,沒什么高明之處,著重塑造一位令人喜愛的獨立自強的女性形象,放到如今有點像是那種沖著表演獎去的影片,好在金吉羅杰斯表演足夠優(yōu)秀,所有這些對于這種表演挑大梁的影片已經(jīng)最夠好了。
女性的獨立自主讓她們在戀愛和婚姻的思想中更加自由,但現(xiàn)實依然是殘酷的,撥開愛情的煙霧彈才是女主人公最終選擇的路。金格爾的眼睛很美,表演的很細膩。感謝鯨魚奶奶的辛苦翻譯和可樂大神的辛苦校對。DL:http://t.cn/8spMLCW or http://t.cn/8spMLCl
不明白為什么女主一次次離開,又一次次等待男主來找。什么毛病啊~~
父親的水晶球,逗趣的女室友,刻字的酒瓶子,敗選的共和黨,古老的費城家族,五歲的前夫之子……以及不知道誰說過的老話:一個人終歸會選擇去見醫(yī)生。
還不錯,打破美國夢,試圖用一種女權的視角去審視愛情,但正如開片展示的那樣對女權的理解有些偏頗。人家那時就在宣揚不要拜金,現(xiàn)在咱們卻盡是嫁入豪門就能過上好生活的韓劇節(jié)奏,明顯意識上就不正確嘛。片子講得有點慢了,但頗具說服力,金吉跟角色很搭。講童話的人很聰明總是不到結局就把故事結束了
Dennis Morgan的小嘴歪的真性感。
7.5,有些地方繞有趣味嘛,金格也是贊,風趣可愛又獨立自主,難得痕跡又淡。愛情也要建立在獨立的人格之上,做不了自己怎么可能得到屬于自己的愛情?
FINALLY OSCARS
1940年的電影已經(jīng)告訴我們灰姑娘這種童話故事往往終結于生活真正開始的地方。Beautiful Ginger Rogers
說句不著調(diào)的:上世紀三四十年代美國王漫妮的愛情生活故事。
不是每一個沒有太多才華卻頑固偏激的女人都像Kitty Foyle 那么幸運,在最后時刻仍有選擇的余地。
糾結但不矯情的三角戀,鮮明而自然的角色設定,俊美的臉蛋兒更讓人入戲。Dennis Morgan, James Craig
過去的就讓他滾 來來回回不像樣
有沒有人覺得Dennis Morgan的角色很令人反感?
很迷琴逑的發(fā)亮大眼&高挑氣質(zhì),通片看下來編排還蠻棒的,情節(jié)上有點像瓊瑤的《秋歌》。承認吧,愛在階級面前大部分時候還是要低頭的,你怎么能指望生活事業(yè)完全仰仗豪門的男主闊少跟女主過窮日子呢?琴逑最后的離開很是瀟灑明智,只是40s初就加入懷孕墮胎元素未免太偶像劇了。2020.08.01-08.03
雖然喜歡Ginger但是她這次拿奧斯卡應該是沾了角色的光,不是說她表現(xiàn)不好,但是同一年提名的女演員都非常好,不過Kitty這個角色癡情熱情專情,結尾選擇婚姻家庭,符合被辜負的好女人形象。電影整體挺中規(guī)中矩的那種好看,幾次雪球閃回到后來有點疲勞
Ginger就算專門拍劇情片也會是個很好的演員,跟Fred在一起拍歌舞片是有點壓制了她的表演天賦的。
3.5/5 可惜了啊 這本子給塞克拍 能高個檔次啊
Ginger依然是心中性感女神,越老越有味道,本片一舉獲得年度最佳室友,年度最尷尬約會,年度最成熟21歲,年度最佳陸毅模仿秀四項提名,其中年度最佳陸毅模仿秀這個獎項拿獎幾乎沒有懸念