Are you getting tired of hearing how brilliant ITV’s new murder-mystery programme Grantchester is yet? Thought so. Well now that everyone has calmed down a bit (it wasn’t that good was it?), we’ve had a chance to rewatch Episode One and tear it apart. Here are some of the things they got wrong:
- Firstly, as many of you noticed, the vicar in Grantchester was also the rapist in recent BBC drama Happy Valley. It took us all a little while to adjust to his new persona but once we did, national swooning over vicar Sidney Chambers (James Norton) began in earnest.
- During the railway station scenes, if you stuck your head out of the window for some air (as we did), you’d have heard a resounding chorus rising above the rooftops of “That’s not Cambridge! There’s no underpass at Cambridge station! Fake! Cheat! Where is the Upper Crust?!” For some reason they actually filmed those scenes at Horstead Keynes Railway station in West Sussex. Clearly the multiplatform metropolis that is the new Cambridge station was not adaptable to a 1950s location.
- And similarly, if you were squinting very hard through the German widow’s net curtains, and trying to work out where her house was, then you’d have been forgiven for not recognising it as the private house scenes were filmed in a variety of places including Watford, Rickmansworth, Sarratt and Kings Langley. Cambridge residents must have been reluctant to allow huge film crews to take over their living rooms, although some probably regret this now that they’ve seen the vicar is played by hunky James Norton.
- There were frequent shots of James pedalling furiously from Grantchester to Cambridge, each time culminating in a little cruise down King’s Parade, which had been marvellously transformed into a 1950s street. However, eagle eyed viewers noted that if Sidney was indeed pedalling from Grantchester then he was very much going in the wrong direction. The only thing we can think is that maybe he’d travelled from Grantchester by punt and then cycled from Bridge Street.
- Something that really got on our nerves was the incessant offering of sherry to the vicar, (“fancy a sherry vicar? Groan”) which was presumably some kind of allusion to Monty Python’s Sherry Drinking Vicar sketch but, as the programme pre-dates Monty Python by almost 20 years, it was a bit confusing. Do vicars drink sherry? Was this to do with Monty Python or was it something else? We’re not sure. If you have any information regarding the very pressing issue of vicars and sherry, we’d like to hear from you.
- Finally, Sidney’s urge to fight crime leads him to the police station where Robson Green is the Detective Inspector. There’s been a suicide (but it’s a really a murder) and Sid asks Robbo if he can check out the evidence. And why not? After an initial refusal, the inspector just hands everything over and Sid has a good look through. The urge to fight crime is strong in lots of us but, while we’ve never actually tried to, something tells us that if we were to pitch up now at Parkside police station and offer to help, we’d be told to go away.
http://www.cambridge-news.co.uk/Grantchester-got-wrong/story-23122035-detail/story.html#ixzz3I65LMIMI Vicar跟Sherry那個是怎麼回事啊? 完全不懂這個梗哎。。。Apparently,這記者也搞不懂。。
I had to say goodbye. I just needed to say it, I think. We have a choive, don't we? We can live in the past. We can look forward. Or we can live now. Because we can't change what's happened. We can't predict the future. None of us knows what's around the corner. That's the truth of it. All we can do is keep a long view and hold a steady course.
“我得跟過去說再見了,我必須得說。我們總能做出選擇,不是嗎?我們可以選擇活在過去,我們可以選擇面向未來,我們還可以選擇活在當(dāng)下。因為我們改變不了業(yè)已發(fā)生的事情,我們也不能預(yù)知未來。沒人知道在下一個轉(zhuǎn)角會發(fā)生什么,這就是事實。我們能做的,就是把目光放長遠,穩(wěn)步前行?!?br>
不再容忍長期受到家暴的妻子褪去鮮亮的妝容,將丑陋的淤青暴露在眾人面前。
不能容忍背叛自己的德國女友毅然離開了牧師,頭也不回。
不愿容忍軍隊生涯中德國被俘士兵被同伴槍殺卻能全身而退毫不受良心譴責(zé)的退伍軍人一個個將他的同伴們殺害。
絕不容忍惡人為非作歹而自己的探長朋友卻受槍傷性命不保的牧師想方設(shè)法拯救大家,只身一人前去調(diào)查。
無法容忍牧師整日渾渾噩噩的馬太太和Leonard主動提出要用一切方法幫助牧師。
無力容忍自己的戰(zhàn)友受槍傷的痛苦折磨而含淚用自己的槍結(jié)束了戰(zhàn)友生命的牧師,他的內(nèi)心誰來拯救?
還有他的老相好,就這樣出嫁了,自己根本去不了她的婚禮。
最后一集,兩個女人離他而去,幸好還有Mrs M和探長他老婆。最后一集見證了德國兵、多個退伍兵和他的戰(zhàn)友以及自殺的罪犯的死亡,其晦暗程度不言自明。好在一切都以回歸結(jié)尾。友人得之不易,且行且珍惜。
http://www.lofter.com/tag/%E7%89%A7%E5%B8%88%E7%A5%9E%E6%8E%A2
- People feel they can tell me things. - You're lucky. No-one feels they can tell me anything. 就這樣,無所不知牧師和什么都打聽不到警察聯(lián)手了……
這次輪到側(cè)寫顧問做差佬了,哈哈 / 推理部分實在太弱雞,破案基本靠猜,抓人基本靠撞,可是主角主配人設(shè)都好可愛,當(dāng)做下飯的小點心看還是不錯的。萊納德和狄更斯萌哭。
德國太太狂加好感值
沒什么不好,也沒有很好,可以繼續(xù)看看。
這劇真是完全沒有推理過程呢,所有案件都是靠牧師男主猜出來的。男主真面帶桃花,對著每個年輕點的女人講話都像在調(diào)情。探長你把你兒子的中間名取成男主名字真的太糟糕了!
這劇里面除了門房老太太比較可愛,其余女角色都是婊即視感…男主角越看越生厭
偏社會寫實、與布朗神父截然不同的神職人員探案?。阂詾樽约嚎梢蕴颖軕?zhàn)時的罪孽、告別無緣的戀人,但到就算到鄉(xiāng)下當(dāng)牧師,還是躲不掉,更慘的是就此變成信眾的垃圾桶。要不是有警探好基友,一定撐不下去!http://hou26.org/zeta/b-crime-drama.htm#ee
探長,您的高腰褲快到胸口了!
這個劇但看設(shè)定是非常棒的,不在推理而在于從未走出戰(zhàn)爭陰影的人。但是拍出來完全是另外一回事,劇本演員還是制片,總覺得哪一點出了問題,特別是如果是看完隔壁摩斯再看這部就會有一種氣提不上來的郁悶。但是第二季應(yīng)該還會看吧……
牛劍周圍還能不能太平了!Robson Green演起了拖家?guī)Э诘牟跐h探長,和心理追兇比簡直是翻身農(nóng)奴把歌唱啊。Norton真是劍橋神學(xué)院畢業(yè)的(不會懷疑人生嗎?)他這牧師當(dāng)?shù)谜骘L(fēng)生水起,都分不清是偵探還是言情了。相比之下Morse師徒幾代簡直恨不得一人發(fā)一個“孤星入命”的紙條貼臉上。
劇名翻譯不對,應(yīng)該叫格蘭切斯特小鎮(zhèn)故事……
最無法接受的就是robson greene,才從心理追兇過來,他死理性派學(xué)術(shù)派天才社交無能的設(shè)定還印象深刻呢,就讓我接受這樣一個隨性但是無能陪襯?但是總的來說,每集其實都挺有心,故事還是很值得看的,重點確實不在于推理,而在于每集結(jié)束后的反省。
布朗大叔在休假,西德尼哥哥又登場,愛死這五十年代的英倫調(diào)了!
不性感的牧師不是好神探
ITV做這種類型已經(jīng)過于熟練了。
比起人物和感情,案件更像是點綴。
中譯名真的不忍吐槽,其實就是一個Grantchester里一個牧師兼職做偵探的故事,并不是很神。自從神夏火了之后,所有的偵探中譯名都要跟著神探xxx來,也挺煩的。破案的部分真的不足,充其量就是靈光一閃然后破案了,也沒啥技術(shù)含量,牧師個人感情篇幅也占比一半??催^Norton和女主的很多很多很多劇了,但這是第一次get到他倆,諾頓憨憨的,女主扮相真的很美(適合復(fù)古劇,不適合現(xiàn)代劇)。德國太太簡直是全劇亮點,毒舌吐槽簡直笑死人。What the Dickens?
每部劇都有自己的特色和專注點,這雖然也算是一部探案劇,不過更側(cè)重對小神父心理變化表述,內(nèi)心總是迷茫的思考也好像是被動的。風(fēng)景美如畫,喜歡這樣的鄉(xiāng)村生活,但是就算是移民卻也就丟失了心靈的歸屬感,畢竟不是自己的家鄉(xiāng),只有遺憾。喜歡Robson Green透明的眼睛,有吸引人的魔力!
迷戀英國鄉(xiāng)村美景!
感覺單數(shù)集比雙數(shù)集好看,男主好帥,每集的說教有點牽強,整體風(fēng)格好克制冷靜,看的時候不能分神,但是娛樂元素就缺乏了。。想想少年包青天一遍探案一邊煽情還有搞笑也是蠻high的