很喜歡,所以摘錄下來(lái):
“Why photograph war? Is it possible to put an end to a form of human behavior which has existed throughout history by means of photography? The proportions of that notion seem ridiculously out of balance yet that very idea has motivated me. For me the strength of photography lies in its ability to evoke a sense of humanity. If war is an attempt to negate humanity, then photography can be perceived as the opposite of war. And if used well, it can be a powerful ingredient in the antidote to war. In a way, if an individual assumes the risk of placing himself in the middle of the war in order to communicate to the rest of the world what is happening, he’s trying to negotiate for peace. Perhaps that’s the reason why those in charge of perpetuating the war do not like to have photographers around.
In the field, what you experience is extremely immediate. What you see is not an image on a page in a magazine ten thousand miles away, with an advertisement for Rolex watches on the next page. What you see is unmitigated pain, injustice and misery. It’s occurred to me that if everyone can be there just once, to see for themselves what white phosphorous does to the face of a child, or what unspeakable pain is caused by the impact of a single bullet, or a jagged piece of shrapnel can rip someone’s leg off. If everyone can be there and see for themselves the fear and grief just one time, and they would understand that nothing is worth letting things get to the point where that happens to one person, let alone thousands. But everyone cannot be there, and that is why photographers go there: to show them, to reach out and grab them, make them stop what they are doing and pay attention to what is going on. To create pictures powerful enough to overcome the eluding effects of the mass media and shake people out of their indifference. To protest. By the strength of that protest, to make others protest…
The worst thing to feel is as a photographer, I’m benefitting from someone else’s tragedy. This idea haunts me. It’s something I have to reckon with everyday. I know that if I ever allowed genuine compassion to be overtaken by personal ambition, I will have sold my soul. The only way I can justify my role is to have respect for the other person’s predicament. The extent to which I do that is the extent to which I become accepted by the other, and to that extent, I can accept myself.”
記錄記錄者的電影。觀眾所見(jiàn)的影像與影片內(nèi)攝影師鏡頭下的影像形成了某種互文,讓我們感受到了方寸的屏幕之外所醞釀的無(wú)限情緒,正如片中幾幅照片的展現(xiàn)——“猙獰”嘶吼的人像面部,靜態(tài)無(wú)聲卻又震耳欲聾,那是一種所有人都心領(lǐng)神會(huì)的痛感。這可能也是攝影的意義——用視覺(jué)的畫面?zhèn)鬟f一種人類共通的情感與意識(shí)。
片中另一個(gè)印象深刻的表達(dá),是畫面從雅加達(dá)難民就地露宿的火車軌道旁切換到漢堡城市之內(nèi)高度現(xiàn)代化的列車站臺(tái),和《無(wú)名》中那兩只狗的出現(xiàn)有異曲同工之妙,同時(shí)又一次形成了一種奇特的對(duì)比,以一種近乎戲謔的方式在憤怒,在哭泣。
在我看來(lái),戰(zhàn)地?cái)z影師也在作為一名戰(zhàn)士完成著自己的戰(zhàn)斗,甚至他在進(jìn)行著的,是一種更為艱難的孤軍奮戰(zhàn)與單打獨(dú)斗——對(duì)抗著惡劣環(huán)境下的生理反應(yīng),對(duì)抗著對(duì)戰(zhàn)雙方的怒焰與仇視,對(duì)抗著自我內(nèi)心對(duì)于這場(chǎng)戰(zhàn)役的價(jià)值判斷,對(duì)抗著人性最惡劣的角落。記錄者從來(lái)都不是冷漠的,他們蘊(yùn)含著的熊熊人文關(guān)懷之心火是這片戰(zhàn)場(chǎng)最為高大的信仰之柱,而擁有共情能力的人往往也承受著更為濃重的情感負(fù)擔(dān),正如他所說(shuō):在我想讓別人相信之前我要讓自己相信。
影像傳播的力量是無(wú)窮深遠(yuǎn)的,其意義也隨時(shí)間空間的輪轉(zhuǎn)而迭代延伸。這部電影帶給所有人的,是在我們看完之后,每個(gè)人都會(huì)在心中跟誦一遍主角的話語(yǔ):我很幸運(yùn),他們都在的時(shí)候,我也在。正是這樣的指引,在沖擊著你我的靈魂,在喚醒著你我的人性。
他憑借勇氣與良心成為了世界的一雙眼睛。他以別人的苦難謀生,為的是讓這些苦難不再上演。
如果你拍的不夠好,那是因?yàn)槟氵€不夠近。戰(zhàn)地?cái)z影的力量在于喚醒人性,然而并不是所有的人都可以來(lái)到這里,so I'm here。
“這活從來(lái)就不容易,但最近幾年正變得越來(lái)越困難。整個(gè)社會(huì)變得更癡迷于娛樂(lè)、名人和時(shí)尚。廣告主們已經(jīng)厭倦了他們的產(chǎn)品總被展示在人類悲劇的圖像旁邊,因?yàn)樗麄冇X(jué)得,不知怎么的,這會(huì)降低他們產(chǎn)品的銷售力?!?/p>
還真有點(diǎn)懷念陶濤的紀(jì)錄片課
英文部分沒(méi)有字幕,有些不能全然理解,但卻深深折服,值得回味和思考的片子。
真實(shí)記錄,比真人真事電影還要震撼
James Natchwey對(duì)于自己職責(zé)的堅(jiān)守令人感動(dòng),但沒(méi)讓我覺(jué)得有多震撼
你看到雜志左頁(yè)印尼河邊的難民了嗎?你看到按最大注意力法則優(yōu)先排在右頁(yè)的大幅香車美女廣告了嗎?你看到攝影展上舉著酒杯的人群了嗎?他們都是現(xiàn)實(shí),但誰(shuí)又能說(shuō)端著相機(jī)在戰(zhàn)火中打滾的Nachtway不是現(xiàn)實(shí)呢?幸運(yùn)的是,還有這么一群人在提醒我們,要在快速的現(xiàn)代文明里慢下來(lái),提醒我們社會(huì)不公和貧富差
想當(dāng)年我也是懷抱戰(zhàn)地記者夢(mèng)想的一枚軟妹啊。。。。
太棒了.看完之后心里的感覺(jué)翻江倒海.很希望自己也是一個(gè)戰(zhàn)地?cái)z影師.還有他講述的他自己的矛盾,是因?yàn)樗约禾屏迹还馐钦掌氖录屓苏鸷?,照片本身也是藝術(shù).不知道怎么說(shuō).這個(gè)人是個(gè)偉人.
“作為攝影師,我最大的痛苦在于我知道自己的一切名聲和利益都建立在別人的苦難之上,這讓我每天掙扎煎熬。如果有一天,我的野心超越了我的同情心,那時(shí)的我就失去了靈魂?!?如此偉大的攝影師,不僅拍出了人間最沉痛的苦難,而且如此自省,在長(zhǎng)期注視深淵的時(shí)候仍然能維持金子般的心靈。Salute!
看得渾身發(fā)抖,這才是記者,不僅因?yàn)樗苌钊腚U(xiǎn)境,而是他面對(duì)事件和世界時(shí)不放縱自己的情感,只是保持著他的憐憫!
“如果有一天我對(duì)于個(gè)人成就的追求超過(guò)了對(duì)于我同類的同情,那么我就是出賣了我的靈魂”看完覺(jué)得戰(zhàn)地?cái)z影師真是那種工作本質(zhì)就無(wú)法達(dá)成和諧的職業(yè)。它一方面需要充沛的情感力量,去同情、去憐憫、相信自己是在行善,另一方面它又要求足夠理性,甚至“冷血”,只有這種冰冷才能讓攝影師相信在災(zāi)難面前,最有效的(又或許完全無(wú)效呢?)對(duì)抗方式是舉起相機(jī),隨時(shí)準(zhǔn)備按下快門。片中經(jīng)常出現(xiàn)的Jim第一視角鏡頭充分詮釋了蘇珊桑塔格口中的攝影內(nèi)在的窺視屬性和捕食屬性。這種無(wú)法甩脫的直覺(jué)會(huì)讓人不斷去懷疑觀看乃至拍攝悲慘圖片的意圖——說(shuō)到底,我們是在以一種怎樣的姿態(tài)介入他人的苦難?好在片中的Jim有足夠強(qiáng)大的信念支撐他
該有多大的勇氣和悲憫,才能夠在面對(duì)死亡和苦難時(shí),冷靜地按下快門。
我無(wú)法理解被火車碾斷胳膊和腿的人是如何繼續(xù)日夜住在軌道邊的
納切威沒(méi)有說(shuō)一句話,但我能深深感到他內(nèi)心的強(qiáng)大和憤怒。我一直覺(jué)得,戰(zhàn)地?cái)z影師是新聞工作者中離人性最近,也是最遠(yuǎn)的。
人類不值得。20201219@廣州金紅棉紀(jì)錄片佛山百老匯影院佛老匯分會(huì)場(chǎng)
“如果你拍得不夠好,那是因?yàn)槟汶x得不夠近?!钡?,如果你離得足夠近,你隨時(shí)都有可能與你的拍攝對(duì)象一樣,死于非命。詹姆斯·納切威,一個(gè)30年來(lái)如此之近地拍攝戰(zhàn)亂的攝影師,卻還活著,這也許是奇跡,因?yàn)樯系坌枰难劬εc鏡頭。那些照片,看多了真的會(huì)做噩夢(mèng)的,人類的自作孽已經(jīng)超出上帝的想象
戰(zhàn)地?cái)z影師存在的一個(gè)很大理由,在片尾說(shuō)清楚了,不是誰(shuí)都可以親臨歷史的現(xiàn)場(chǎng),所以我們大概需要一個(gè)客觀的講述者,而這個(gè)講述者應(yīng)該就是戰(zhàn)地?cái)z影師了~二戰(zhàn)之后大規(guī)模的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)沒(méi)有了,但局部的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)根本沒(méi)有斷過(guò),波斯尼亞、科索沃、南非、印尼、巴勒斯坦、剛果、阿富汗、伊拉克、敘利亞~原因無(wú)非就是代理人戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng),沖突的根源就是利益,表現(xiàn)形式通常是種族和宗教的不融合~人類真的可以對(duì)同類做出難以置信的暴行,所以,人類補(bǔ)全計(jì)劃神馬時(shí)候能完成呢?還是大家一起變橙汁吧~
"If your pictures aren't good enough, you're not close enough. " ---Capa/"Every minute I was there, I wanted to flee.I did not want to see this.Would I cut and run, or would I deal withthe responsibility of being there with a camera"-James Nacht