Featuring the late Bob Hoskins’ only Oscar-nominated performance, Neil Jordan’s third feature MONA LISA is a heady dissertation of the unrequited love complex.
Hoskin plays George, a forty-odd, uncouth small-time gangster freshly out of the joint after a seven-year stint, assigned by his old boss Denny Mortwell (Caine) to chauffeur a West End dark-skinned call girl Simone (Tyson), with their initial mutual aversion petering out in the progress of time when they realize both are indeed good people, quite naturally, George falls in love with Simone, a hard-hitting, drop-dead gorgeous princess mired in a seedy business, but is her feeling reciprocal?
Before soon George will pull his back into looking for an underage prostitute Cathy (Hardie), Simone’s friend when she was a streetwalker soliciting near the dank and murky vicinity of King’s Cross, which directly pits him against both Denny and Cathy’s ruthless pimp Anderson (Peters), after he rescues Cathy from an odious senile punter, the three of them escapes to Brighton, but blood must be drawn to settle the score once for all in the purlieu of Brighton West Pier.
Burrowing into London’s tenderloin of kinky sex service and underage prostitution ring, which would not be scandalous to today’s audience, MONA LISA’s most valuable asset lies in Hoskins’ lived-in performance, a walking dynamo spectacularly running the gamut from garish swagger to heartfelt compassion. Hoskins’ dumpy figure casts an almost comical contrast with the svelte Tyson when they stand or walk cheek by jowl (an inverted PRETTY WOMAN scenario occasions when Simone drags George into a posh store to buy him some decent clothes, to his bewilderment then contentment), George professes “I’m cheap and God made me this way”, but his slow but thorough transformation makes a persuasive case which is universally vicarious, the salient message is that love can change a person to the better, regardless of his/her background, even it is an unrequited one (the sapphic attraction only circumspectly alluded to), as George’s awakening moral compass proves, he also has a teenage daughter Jeanne (Nathenson), with whom he has many missing father-daughter time to catch up, so we know fairly well what makes him tick.
Newcomer Cathy Tyson is also a revelation, her Simone is a spitfire case-hardened by a cynical and callous world, only recapitulates to the last purity residing in her, she isn’t a damsel-in-distress, but someone who thrives on a sharp sense of self-preservation, even manipulation, what’s more admirably refreshing, she doesn’t put out to show her gratitude, although audience might have various reasons to expect her to do so. A spiffy Michael Caine takes the villain’s place with his usual coolness, confidence and a detestable soup?on of vulgarity.
As in his chef d’oeuvre THE CRYING GAME (1992), Jordan’s humanistic propensity constructs a vigorous backbone in a dark tale, introducing us an unlikely hero, driving in his spick-and-span Jaguar with Nat King Cole’s titular oldie piping up, MONA LISA only can be admired and worshipped from its pedestal, so just let that myth plume.
referential entries: Jordan’s THE CRYING GAME (1992, 8.6/10); John Mackenzie’s THE LONG GOOD FRIDAY (1980, 7.6/10).
第十章 意識形態(tài)-同性戀解放:
【緣起】來自20世紀(jì)60年代許多革命性團(tuán)體的啟發(fā):女性主義、黑人解放運(yùn)動。這之后同性戀主題電影逐漸普遍,尤其是美國和歐洲。部分愿意你是因為好萊塢工業(yè)界的制作法規(guī)被新的分級制度取代而廢除,這類同性戀電影都把同性戀視為歇斯底里、性執(zhí)迷和自我鄙夷的角色,結(jié)尾常不外乎是自殺。當(dāng)然,也有如《熱天午后》、《歌廳》、《另一家園》、《血腥的星期天》、《 我美麗的洗衣店》、《上班女郎》、《 迷幻演出》、《一籠傻鳥》、《蒙娜麗莎》、《長久伴侶》和《費城故事》等片。此外,法斯賓德和阿莫多瓦的電影對同性戀角色有多層次塑造。
看的時候老是想到《哭泣的游戲》,連這個女演員都和那個男演員神似,看完才發(fā)現(xiàn)原來是一個導(dǎo)演,這個人風(fēng)格夠強(qiáng)的。
霍斯金斯這類人 總是能打動人心啊
一次觀看的感想。對于男主的演技雖然受到大眾與影視界的肯定,但是我還是覺得有點不爽,可能是對他的長相還是有偏見。期待進(jìn)一步的解析來提高評分。目前的分是以自己卑微的第一感覺給的。
很喜歡那個年代的英國電影,很有現(xiàn)實感,但又不必非要具有好萊塢大片那種沉重歷史追求。
本來以為是小人物的愛情片 怎么到后來變成懸疑片了 顯得不倫不類 電梯那場戲本可以拍的更出色
當(dāng)他喜歡上她,她也開始信任他時,她讓他幫忙找她,她愛她。
英式幽默,不懈的追尋愛情。尼爾·喬丹的電影總少不了懸疑、幽默、打破世俗。
這部片子有著明顯的尼爾·喬丹元素,不僅在于同性和邊緣式人物,而且還能聽到大量的英倫音樂和經(jīng)典歌曲。在而后的《哭泣游戲》和《冥王星的早餐》中使這種風(fēng)格漸顯成熟。片子本身其實是霍斯金斯扮演的喬治的南柯一夢罷了。妓女也有愛,喬治不僅救了他人,更是完成了自我救贖。不過,對于尼爾·喬丹的早期電影來說題材和手法還略顯生澀。
真是“眾里尋她千百度”!知道真相后回過頭去想前半部分,真是倍顯凄涼?;羲菇鹚寡莸谜婧?,假似是愛情,其實更像是通過尋人找到了自己的寄托
《哭泣的游戲》的導(dǎo)演尼爾·喬丹名聲大躁之作。鮑勃·霍斯金斯憑本片囊括戛納、金球、英國學(xué)院獎等的男主角獎。
這次換了講男人?!霸瓉砦屹u給了一對同性戀”,所以你不要看George一臉賤人像,他是不會重蹈覆轍再去給人坐牢。Neil Jordan說愛爾蘭是很灰色的,唯一的色彩來自教堂,那麼一切都迎刃而解了,只是一場crying game.
Neil Jordan總拍這種晦澀的片子。。。Hoskins的演技著實是好
"I'm just another fuckin' bugger to you!"
喬治被妻子拒之門外,成了一位黑人妓女的司機(jī),在無數(shù)次的等待相見爭執(zhí)和好之后,喬治混淆了她妓女或是修女的身份,于是一腔熱情投身尋找卡絲的任務(wù)中,穿梭娛樂場所時響起了美妙的創(chuàng)世紀(jì)的陷入太深,正是他一廂情愿的寫照,救人救己,傷心亦美麗。
在Neil Jordan的片子里算不上杰出,不過鮑勃貌似憑借此片拿到了戛納和金球影帝,還有奧斯卡提名。
比四顆略好。尼爾.喬丹對于同性題材有偏好,音樂很棒。
漂亮名字下的黑暗現(xiàn)實,還好那支兔子活著,逃命時跑出兩個侏儒來那段笑死。
只是因為想看Bob Hoskins跟Michael Caine同臺而看的這部電影,卻毫無防備地被劇情跟主角的表演吸引,短短的104分鐘塑造了一個細(xì)微入至飽滿立體的George,怪不得幫助Bob Hoskins一舉拿下金球戛納. 可惜再也看不到他的作品了 RIP
不管是從拍攝時間還是手法或者他要說的,都比哭泣游戲有那種曖昧的感覺,算是我最喜歡的尼爾·喬丹的作品
妓女西蒙可以看成是落魄男人的某種理想色彩的生活指向,帶有意淫后的完美意象和情感指涉,但是隨著時間的剝進(jìn),現(xiàn)實的面目開始不斷背向呈現(xiàn),理想的失落過程是所有幻夢的最終結(jié)局。一場無疾而終的愛戀,人與人的際遇充滿了自作多情和一廂情愿,夢想也是??梢钥闯煽奁螒虻男ㄗ?,具有某種微妙的復(fù)合。